EDH 3256: Sports Organisation, Management and Coaching Assessment Task 3: Criterion Rubric
Page 1 of 2
Participation Authentication form | ||||||
Acquiring | (5%) | Community Officiating General Principles Certificate Submitted (5%) | Community Officiating General Principles Certificate Not Submitted (0%) |
|||
Participation Authentication Form Satisfactorily Submitted | Participation Authentication Form Not Satisfactorily Submitted |
|||||
Evaluation and Analysis of a sporting related carnival, tournament or event volunteered (Part B) | ||||||
HD | A | B | C | Fail | ||
Applying Evaluating | Evaluation of event (10%) |
• Insightful and well-reasoned convincing justified evaluation of the event volunteered at, supported with highly relevant academic literature and extensive, relevant examples |
• Comprehensive and well-reasoned justified evaluation of the event volunteered at, supported with generally relevant academic literature and multiple, relevant examples |
• Sound justified evaluation of the event volunteered at, supported with appropriate academic literature and some practical examples |
• Basic evaluation of the event volunteered at, supported with some appropriate academic literature and few practical examples but requiring more explanation |
• Weak, limited evaluation of the event volunteered at, supported with little or no academic literature and lack of practical examples to evidence presence of volunteering |
Analysis of Strengths (10%) |
• Three strengths evaluated are crucial, clearly highlighted through extensive, relevant examples and analysed in-depth |
• Three strengths evaluated are important, highlighted through multiple, relevant examples and analysed |
• Three strengths evaluated are somewhat important, highlighted through some examples and analysed |
• At least two strengths evaluated are trivial, highlighted through few examples and described |
• One or no strengths were poorly evaluated with a lack of examples and further explanation required |
|
Recommendations (10%) |
• Three recommendations evaluated are crucial, clearly highlighted through extensive, relevant examples and analysed in-depth |
• Three recommendations evaluated are important, highlighted through multiple, relevant examples and analysed |
• Three recommendations evaluated are somewhat important, highlighted through some examples and analysed |
• At least two recommendations evaluated are trivial, highlighted through few examples and described |
• One or no recommendations were poorly evaluated with a lack of examples and further explanation required |
|
Communication, research and referencing (5%) |
• Meticulous language use and literacy, including spelling, grammar, punctuation and sentence structure • Comprehensive range of high quality research sources acknowledged both ‘in text’ and in a reference list without error. |
• Careful language use and literacy, including spelling, grammar, punctuation and sentence structure • Relevant range of research sources correctly acknowledged both ‘in text’ and in a reference list. |
• Methodical language use and literacy, including spelling, grammar, punctuation and sentence structure • Research sources acknowledged both ‘in text’ and in a reference list with some minor errors. |
• Adequate language use and literacy, including spelling, grammar, punctuation and sentence structure • Some research sources acknowledged both ‘in text’ and in a reference list with some errors |
• Careless language use and literacy, including spelling, grammar, punctuation and sentence structure • Few, if any, research sources acknowledged ‘in text’ or in a reference list. |
EDH 3256: Sports Organisation, Management and Coaching Assessment Task 3: Criterion Rubric
Page 2 of 2
Comments: Overall Mark: /40 |
Tags: assignmentexpert, assignmenthelp, assignmenthelpaustralia, assignmenthelper, assignmenthelpuk, assignmenthelpusa, assignmentwriting, bestpriceguaranteed, bestqualityguaranteed, london🇬🇧, myassignmenthelp, plagiarismfreework