1
Resit Assessment Point 2: Self-reflective Essay – Critical Reflection on Case Study
ASSESSMENT BRIEF AND MARKING RUBRIC
Module title: Marketing in a Digital Age and Corporate Social Responsibility
(MK7040-R)
Assessment point: Resit Assessment point 2 (Week 12)
Assessment task: Reflective Essay
Word count limit: 3000 words +/- 10% (excluding references and appendices)
Width: 50% of overall module grade
Procedure in the event of illness or other valid cause (extenuating circumstances)
If you believe that:
• your performance in assessment or reassessment has been impaired, or;
• you were unable to attend for an assessment or reassessment, or;
• you were unable to submit assessed or reassessed work by the scheduled date due to illness or
other valid cause (as defined in the Procedures Governing Extenuating Circumstances), may
submit an application for extenuation for the relevant component(s) to Unicaf Extenuating
Circumstances team ([email protected]).
*Once a component has been capped, extenuation does not uncap it.
Academic misconduct including plagiarism
Ensure that you are familiar with the relevant regulations regarding academic misconduct. By
submitting the assignment, you declare that it is your own work and that the material and sources of
information used, including internet sources, have been fully identified and properly acknowledged.
In addition, you confirm that the presented work has not been submitted for any other assessment.
You also acknowledge that the faculty reserves the right to investigate allegations of plagiarism and
other forms of academic misconduct which, if proven and dependent on the severity level of the
offence, may result in a penalty that could affect your progress.
2
By submitting your work, you acknowledge that you have read and agreed with the above
statements.
General Guidance
Your assignment should be MS Word processed (handwritten assignments are not accepted),
using Times New Roman size 12 font, double spaced, with numbered pages and your student
number printed as a footer on every page. Note this is a report supported by academic research so
you should adhere to the appropriate referencing guidance. The word limit stated for this
assignment excludes the list of references at the end of the assignment but includes all text in the
main body of the assignment (including direct quotations, in-text citations, footnotes, tables,
diagrams and graphs). Please be aware that exceeding the word limit will affect the academic
judgement of the piece of work and may result in the award of a lower mark. Appendices are not
considered a supplement and will not be assessed as part of the content of the assignment. As
such, they will not contribute to the grade awarded; however, it may be appropriate to use an
Appendices section for any material which is a useful reference for the reader. Please note that
appendices are not included in the word count. The majority of references should come from
secondary sources (e.g. journal articles, conference papers, reports, etc.) although you can also
utilise area specific textbooks. You must ensure that you use the Harvard style of referencing.
Please indicate the word count length at the end of your assignment.
Marking and assessment
This assignment will be marked out of 100% and contributes to 50% of the total module mark.
The pass mark is 50%. Nevertheless, in order to pass this module, you must both achieve an
aggregate mark of 50% and also meet the assignment threshold marks. For the purposes of
passing a module each assignment has a threshold mark of 40%.
The marking rubric is attached, which offers guidance on the assessment criteria and weighting.
Late Submission
There will be a stipulated deadline date for all assignments. All assignments will need to be
submitted by the set time on the stipulated deadline date. Assignments submitted up to 24
3
hours late will be accepted, but the assignment mark will be subject to a deduction of 5 marks
from the mark awarded.
However, it is important to note that resit students must take into consideration the feedback they
received from the previous submission/s of this assessment point, in order to enhance their work,
which will enable them to get a passing grade.
Learning outcomes applied in this assessment
1. develop a critical understanding of major concepts, frameworks, and methods in marketing
and corporate social responsibility, and assess their application in the business environment,
including brand value. (IC) (SID) (EID)
4. critically evaluate marketing strategies, including digital marketing solutions – in different
business contexts, and address their implications including ethical issues, and reflect on the
significance of key historical events. (IC) (DP) (SID) (CID) (CC)
6. critically assess currently implemented corporate social responsibility solutions and recognise
the links between the adoption of certain solutions and the performance of business operations.
(IC) (SID) (CID) (CC)9. collect, analyze and synthesize data; and take a problem-solving
approach to strategic thinking, and creativity.
7. adopt a persuasive argumentation, and present it in verbal or written communication. (UGB)
(EID)
Assessment guidelines
For completing this Task successfully, you must summarize all the academic knowledge you
receive from the module’s content and professional benefits you received while critically
Task:
Provide a critical self-reflection essay of the process of completing assignment 1
4
analysed the case study/company selected including strategic implications and strategic business
issues, during the development of summative assignment 1 during the 6th Week of this module.
5
The indicators of a good reflection are:
➢ It is personal to you
➢ It is clear how the learning relates to your role or prepares for a future role
➢ It outlines the content and method of the learning activity
➢ It describes how your knowledge, skills and attributes have developed
as a result of the learning activity.
➢ It identifies any further gaps or learning you did not cover and how
you might fill these.
➢ It describes how your current practice might change as a result
➢ It indicates how you will use knowledge acquired for your career benefit
You can approach your Self-Reflective writing as per the four stages below:
1. What did I expect to learn?
2. What did I learn?
3. What will I do differently after forwards?
4. My actions and next steps
A strong Assignment Critical Reflection Requires addressing the following issues:
➢ High personal effectiveness:
Critical self-awareness;
➢ Self-reflection and self-management;
➢ Time management;
➢ Sensitivity to diversity in people and different situations and
➢ The ability to continue to learn through reflection on practice and experience.
As this is a self-reflective practice essay, within your writing you can use the first person such as
‘I’ or ‘we’.
6
Note the suggested structure for your essay:
Section/aspect | Content to cover | Marks available |
Introduction 250 words |
General background on the topic you are going to discuss. Possible definitions for terms relating to the question. What the essay will include and/or leave out (scope). What themes the essay will discuss and the order they are presented. What the essay will argue / demonstrate (thesis statement). |
10 Marks |
Main Body 2450 words |
Summarize all the academic knowledge you receive from the module’s content and professional benefits you received while critically analysed the case study/company selected including strategic implications and strategic business issues, during the development of summative assignment 1. In doing so: – Critically reflect on your personal learning experience – Make effective use of relevant literature (but not extensive) – Provide your own argument and show evidences of critical thinking |
60 Marks |
7
Conclusions 300 words |
Links back to the themes identified in the introduction. A reminder of what the essay has argued. |
15 Marks |
8
A recap of the main themes that have been discussed. |
||
Formatting and Referencing (list of references not included in word count) |
High-quality presentation of the material that conforms to principles of academic writing and contains minimal errors in sentence construction, grammar and punctuation. The assignment followed appropriate academic conventions regarding in-text citations and referencing. |
15 Marks |
Total: 3000 words | 100 Marks |
Masters Grading Scale
Grade | Grade Range |
Distinction | 70-100 % |
Merit | 60-69 % |
Pass | 50-59 % |
Not passed | 0-49 % |
ty | ||||||||
Assessment Title: | (Resit MK7040 Assessment -R) Point 2 | |||||||
Criteria and weighting |
90-100% Highly Exceptional Work |
80 – 90% Outstanding Work |
70 – 79% Excellent Work |
60 – 69% Very Good Quality Work |
50 – 59% Good Quality Work |
40 – 49% Acceptable work with some good aspects |
20 – 39% Work does not satisfy assessment criteria |
0-19% Work fails to meet the assessment criteria |
Understanding and knowledge |
Exceptional and outstanding integration of the appropriate data, contextualised with commercial awareness, business maturity and skill. |
Excellent integration of the appropriate data, contextualised with good evidence to show commercial awareness, business maturity and skill. |
Very good integration of the appropriate data, contextualise d with evidence to show commercial awareness, business maturity and skill. |
Good integration of the appropriate data, contextualised with good evidence to show overall awareness, business maturity and skill. |
Adequate integration of the appropriate data, contextualised with good evidence to show overall awareness, business maturity and skill. |
Some integration of the appropriate data, contextualised with limited evidence to show awareness, business maturity and skill. |
Poor quality of integration of the appropriate data, contextualised with very limited evidence to show awareness, business maturity and skill. |
No integration of the appropriate data, contextualise d with very poor evidence to show awareness, business maturity and skill. |
Application of theory and critical evaluation |
All relevant theories/conce pt ual models accurately and extensively presented. Exceptiona l application of theory and |
All relevant theories/conc e ptual models accurately and extensively presented. Excellent delivery of applied |
Virtually all relevant theories/conc eptual models accurately and extensively presented. High level |
Most of the relevant theories/conc e ptual models accurately presented. Good level delivery of applied theory. |
Some of the relevant theories/conc e ptual models accurately presented. A reasonable delivery of applied theory. |
Omissions and inaccuracies in the presented of theories/conce pt ual models. Some level of delivery of applied theory. |
Many deficiencies and omissions in theories/concept ual models. Delivery of applied theory is inadequate or wholly absent. |
Major deficiencies and omissions in theories/conc eptual models. Delivery of applied theory is wholly absent. |
materials. Exceptional ly innovative. Outstanding professional and appropriate delivery and language. Accurate referenci ng |
of applied theory. Very innovative . Strongly profession al and appropriat e delivery and language. Well referenced throughout |
Language, Reading and Referencing |
Highly innovative. Very professional and appropriate delivery and language. Very well referenced throughout. |
High standard of innovation. Professional and appropriate delivery and language. Referencing most accurate. |
Good standard of innovation. Appropriate delivery and language. Many referencing errors. |
Reasonable standard of innovation. Reasonably appropriate delivery and language. Referencing was inaccurate and/or inconsistent. |
Low quality of innovation. Poor and inadequate delivery and language. Referenci ng very poor. |
No reasonable attempt at innovation. Poor and inadequate delivery and language. Referencing absent. |
supporting
theory.
delivery
througho
ut.
.