| MGT5OBR: Assessment 3 Marking Guide Group Assignment | |||||
| CRITERIA* | A: Excellent (> 80 %) | B: Very good (70 – 79%) | C: Good (60 – 69%) | D: Acceptable (50 – 59%) | N: Unacceptable (<50%) |
| Introduction (5%) | Excellent introduction which clearly defines the fictional business. Sharply focused on relevant and key organisation details. |
Very good introduction with concise description of the fictional business and clear focus on relevant and key organisation details. |
Summary of fictional business is mostly clear and concise. Some irrelevant details or could have more detail on some key information. |
Summary of fictional business provided. Some details inappropriate or unclear. |
Summary of fictional business lacks focus on key or relevant details. |
| Demonstrated knowledge of OB theory (30%) |
In depth analysis undertaken. Highly relevant OB theory or concepts from at least 3 modules are clearly identified and explained. No errors in reasoning, accuracy or relevance. |
Very good analysis undertaken. Relevant OB theory or concepts from at least 3 modules are clearly identified and explained. Very few and minor errors in reasoning, accuracy or relevance. |
Good analysis undertaken OB theory or concepts are adequately described. May discuss OB concepts or theories from fewer than 3 modules, but discussion of concepts is generally good. May include some minor errors in reasoning, accuracy or relevance. |
Solid analysis undertaken. OB theory or concepts are described. May discuss OB concepts or theories from fewer than 3 modules. May have some minor or a few major errors in reasoning, accuracy or relevance. |
Analytical skills not demonstrated. Does not describe OB theory or concepts, or is mostly inaccurate or irrelevant. Does not discuss concepts from at least 3 modules, and discussion is generally poor quality. Theory has not been integrated. |
| Critical application of OB theory (25%) |
Excellent, logical and relevant application of OB theory to the fictional business. Argument is strongly supported by relevant and specific examples. |
Very good, logical and relevant application of OB theory and the fictional business. Argument is well supported by relevant and specific examples. |
Good relevant application of OB theory to the fictional business. Argument is supported by relevant and specific examples. |
Solid application. Superficial linkages between the theory and the fictional business. Examples included but require improvement. |
Basic or underdeveloped application. Examples are disjointed or incorrectly stated. |
| Recommendations (20%) |
Excellent recommendations that are clearly stated and well supported. Recommendations are clearly linked back to issues. Recommendations are very clear, compelling and inspiring. |
Very good recommendations that are supported. Recommendations are mostly linked back to issues. Very few and minor errors in reasoning, accuracy or relevance. |
Good recommendations but could be more strongly related to the overall article analyses and comparisons. May include some minor errors in reasoning. |
Solid attempt to formulate recommendations but may have some minor or a few errors in reasoning or application. Some recommendations are linked back to issues but there are key issues which are not addressed. |
Recommendations are missing or are superficially dealt with. Recommendations are disjointed from the rest of the report. Inappropriate in the way in which recommendations are communicated. |
| Structure, Organisation and Writing (10%) |
Sequence and structure are logical and easy to follow; excellent overall organisation. Excellent grammar and spelling. Excellent conclusion. |
Sequence and structure are logical and easy to follow; very good overall organisation. Very grammar and spelling. Very good conclusion. |
Structured well enough to make sense; could be better organised and more tightly focused upon the topic, may lack focus, engagement or summary. Good grammar and spelling. Good conclusion. |
Mostly coherent organisation; may have some sections where difficult to follow reasoning. Could be more clearly and logically organised. Some grammar and spelling errors. Solid conclusion. |
Lacks coherent organisation and structure. Describes disconnected bits of information or many direct quotes. Poor spelling and grammar. Conclusion either missing or incorrect. |
| Referencing (10%) |
Excellent use of relevant and appropriate sources of literature. Correct referencing used throughout. |
Very good use of relevant and appropriate sources of literature. Correct referencing. |
May include some errors in referencing and citations. |
Acceptable use of relevant sources of literature. Mostly correct referencing. |
Few if any literature sources included and poor referencing. |
| *Note: Weighting of criteria is approximate. Failure to adequately complete one of the criteria (e.g., failure to compare relevant theory &/or concepts, etc.) may result in a substantially lower or even failing mark. |
Tags: Assignment Help for Students, Assignment Help Free, Assignment Help Online Free, Assignment Help Websites, assignmenthelp, AssignmentHelpOnline, BestAssignmentHelp, myassignmenthelp, OnlineAssignmentHelp, Student Assignment Help, University Assignment Help