BCO6603 ERP Systems – Assessment Three Marking GuideHuman Computer Interaction
| Minimal | Somewhat | Acceptable | Good | Excellent | |
| Introduction *e.g. Opening paragraph describes why the report has been written, what it contains and defines key terms |
1 Introduction was unclear/invalid /omitted key definitions/did not introduce the topic* |
2 Introduction was unclear/invalid in part/ omitted key definitions/did not introduce all aspects of the topic * |
2.5 Introduction was generally clear, included some referenced definition/s and introduced the topic to an acceptable standard* |
4 Introduction was clear and introduced the topic using clear, good quality referenced definitions* |
5 Introduction was very clear and introduced the topic using high quality referenced definitions. Writing is of a professional standard* |
| Discussion /Critical Analysis ^e.g. Provide a clear, structured discussion and analysis (compare and contrast the literature) of the topic. Cite quality journal articles and texts to underpin every point in your report. Use relevant business case studies to illustrate key points. |
2 Little evidence of critical analysis and understanding communicated/reference s and case studies are omitted/not used^ |
5 Some evidence of understanding and analysis communicated/ unclear in part/some of the aspects of the topic are not discussed/analysed/ references are incomplete, of poor quality or underutilized/mostly summary/little or no analysis of the literature/case studies not present, of poor quality or incomplete^ |
10 Depth of understanding and reflection is acceptable/the discussion is generally clear/a coherent analysis of the literature is presented. Most aspects of the topic are covered. Most key points are supported with Harvard citations and corresponding Harvard references demonstrating research. Relevant case studies are present and support most key points. ^ |
15 Depth of understanding and reflection meets expectations/the discussion is clear/a coherent, critical analysis of the literature is presented. All aspects of the topic are covered. Most key points are supported with quality Harvard citations and corresponding Harvard references demonstrating research. Several relevant, quality case studies support most key points. ^ |
20 Depth or understanding and analysis is of a professional standard/the discussion is clear and relevant/ a high quality, critical analysis of the literature is provided. All aspects of the topic are covered. All relevant information is presented with Harvard citations and corresponding high quality Harvard references demonstrating research. High quality case studies support all key points. ^ |
| Conclusion #e.g. Closing paragraph/s summarise the key points presented in the report # |
.5 Conclusion was unclear/invalid / did not summarise the key topics discussed # |
1 Conclusion was unclear/invalid in part/did not summarise the key topics discussed # |
1.25 Conclusion was generally clear and summarised the key topics discussed # |
2 Conclusion was clear and summarise the key topics discussed # |
2.5 Conclusion was of a professional standard and summarise the key topics discussed # |
| Presentation -e.g. Professional, consistent format that is free of errors – meaningful headings and sub headings are used. References and citations are provided in Harvard format. The file name, cover page and footer are present and match the assessment instructions. |
.5 There are major issues with length, consistency, layout, headings, use of font, spacing, Harvard format citations, references or structure – |
1 There are some issues with presentation in terms of length, consistency, layout, headings, use of font, spacing, citations /referencing or structure – |
1.25 Presentation is mostly consistent with only minor issues evident in terms of layout, headings, use of font, spacing, citations/referencing and structure – |
2 Presentation is consistent with only one or two minor issues evident in terms of layout, headings, use of font, spacing, citations/referencing and structure – |
2.5 Presentation is of a professional standard. The work is consistent and professional in length, layout, headings, use of font, spacing, citations/referencing and structure – |
| Penalties | Up to 100% Dependent on the level copied material |
Late submission 10% of the total possible mark per day late |
Note that performance indicator descriptions are indicative only and are provided as a general guide. In some cases only part of the indicator description may apply for mark
allocation. In cases where indicator descriptions are varied, additional feedback will be provided.