200843 Integrated Business Experience 2
Assessment 1: Case Study Report (40%)
Marking criteria and standards
Criteria Below
Expectation
Fail (0-
49%)
Met Some
Expectation
Pass (50%-
64%)
Met Most
Expectation
Credit
(65%-
74%)
Exceeds
Expectation
Distinction
(75% –
84%)
Exceeds All
Expectation
HD (85% +)
Report
Range of
sources and
citations
used
(5 marks)
Uses a
very
limited
range of
sources.
Multiple
incorrect
or
inaccurate
uses of
citations.
Uses a good
range of
sources
including
texts,
company
and news
reports.
Cites
sources with
minor errors
only.
Uses a large
range of
sources
including
texts,
company
and news
reports.
Cites
sources
with very
minor errors
only.
Uses an
extensive
range of
texts from
company
reports,
journals,
books,
magazines /
newspapers
and
internet
sources.
Cites
sources
correctly intext and
end-text.
Uses an
impressive
and
extended
range of
scholarly
texts from
company
reports,
journals,
books,
magazines /
newspapers
and internet
sources.
Cites
sources
correctly
and in a
highly
integrated
manner.
Report
Written
Communicati
on Skills
(5 marks)
Displays
poor
organisatio
n and/or
developmen
t making
the report
very
difficult to
follow; the
report
exhibits
unacceptabl
e errors in
grammar,
sentence
structure,
and/or
spelling;
unacceptabl
e writing
skills hinder
readability.
The report
evidences
satisfactory
organisation
and
developmen
t; the report
outline is
readable
and easy to
follow with
only a few
lapses; few
minor errors
in spelling,
grammar,
sentence
structure,
and/or
punctuation
;
The report
evidences
satisfactory
organisation
and
developmen
t; the report
outline is
readable
and easy to
follow with
only a few
lapses; few
minor errors
in spelling,
grammar,
sentence
structure,
and/or
punctuation
;
Effective
organisatio
n and
developmen
t contribute
to very
sound
comprehens
ive report;
readability
is enhanced
by facility
in language
use; uses
business
language
conventions
effectively
Highly
effective
organisation
and
development
contribute
to full and
comprehensi
report;
readability is
enhanced by
facility in
language
use; uses
business
language
conventions
very
effectively
200843 Integrated Business Experience 2
2
Criteria Below
Expectation
Fail (0-
49%)
Met Some
Expectation
Pass (50%-
64%)
Met Most
Expectation
Credit
(65%-
74%)
Exceeds
Expectation
Distinction
(75% –
84%)
Exceeds All
Expectation
HD (85% +)
Report
Analysis of
information
presented in
the report
(20 marks)
No relevant
information
presented.
Limited to
no analysis
developed
in the
report
Basic
information
presented.
Basic
analysis
developed
in the
report
Good
information
presented.
Good
analysis
developed
in the
report
Comprehen
sive
information
presented.
Comprehen
sive
analysis
developed
in the
report
Comprehensi
ve and
convincing
information
presented.
Comprehensi
ve and
convincing
analysis
developed in
the report
Report
Recommenda
tions
(10 marks)
No credible
information
presented.
No
recommend
ations
developed
in the
report
Basic
recommend
ations
developed
in the
report
Good
recommend
ations
developed
in the
report
Comprehen
sive
recommend
ations
developed
in the
report
Comprehensi
ve and
convincing
recommenda
tions
developed in
the report