Feedback Conversaton

113 views 8:03 am 0 Comments June 29, 2023

MBA6064.2
Assignment 2 – Feedback Conversaton
Search
Immersive Reader
Assignment 2 – Feedback Conversaton
Start Assignment
Due Sunday by 23:59
Points 100
Submitng a fle upload
Assignment 2 – FEEDBACK CONVERSATION
Value: 50%
Group or individual: Individual
Word limit: maximum 2,000 words (+/- 10%)
Unit Learning Outcomes:
1. Examine global discipline knowledge to develop a holistc leadership perspectve.
2. Analyse relevant research to inform leadership practce.
3. Integrate theory and practce for effectve organisatonal leadership.
4. Demonstrate clear and persuasive communicaton skills.
5. Justfy values-driven decisions that address complex business issues.
Instructons
In this unit, you will learn about feedback. Why it is so difficult for us to receive feedback
from and provide feedback to the people we work with. In class, we will discuss the
importance of especially developmental feedback and how best to provide such
feedback.
Referencing and Sources
This assessment is not a research report – the focus should be on demonstrating your
understanding of the material and the key ideas by applying them to a leadership
problem. However, your assessment will need to include peer-reviewed academic
sources. Your main sources for references should be the assigned and recommended
readings for this unit: articles from peer-reviewed academic journals and the textbook.
Do not use Wikipedia nor reply primarily on webpages or blogs. The referencing style
required for this unit is the APA 7th referencing style. A reference list and the use of intext citations are required. More details are available in the Referencing Guide on the
Edith Cowan University Library website.
Step 1: For this assessment, you are required to have an actual feedback conversation
(either formal or informal) with someone in your work environment during which you
provide this person with feedback that you think would help them improve their work
behaviour. Remember, prepare, prepare, prepare!
Step 2: After the feedback conversation, please answer the following seven questions:
1. What are the initals of this person?
2. What is your relatonship (e.g., superior, colleague, subordinate) with this person?
3. For how long have you been working with this person?
4. Why did you think that this person is (potentally) problematc for your organizaton?
In other words, what does this person do (or fail to do) and which problems does that
cause? Or what problems may that cause in the future? For whom?
5. How did you prepare the feedback conversaton?
6. Please describe the feedback conversaton. What did you say? Did you say what you
wanted and needed to say? How did you feel while having the feedback
conversaton? How did the other person react?
7. Please reflect back on questons 4, 5, and 6. What did you learn from this feedback
conversaton? How does that relate to theory and research on feedback?
You can use up to 2000 words (in total) to answer all questions.
Step 3: Please submit
One document that contains:
o The seven answers
o Reference List
Extensions
The School of Business and Law is joining the extension tracker system. To apply for an
extension please click
here Links to an external site.. Please note that the system cannot
be used for group work, quizzes, or time-sensitive assessments. In these cases, you need
to make arrangements with me directly to request an extension.
Assignment Criteria/Rubric
See the Rubric below.
Resources
APA 7th Referencing GuideLinks to an external site.
AGLC4 Referencing GuideLinks to an external site.
Academic Integrity
Feedback
Feedback will be available via Canvas > Grades.
Rubric
MBA6064 Assessment 2 Rubric 2023

MBA6064 Assessment 2 Rubric 2023
Criteria Ratngs
This criterion is
linked to a learning
outcomeDescripton
of the problems
(With reference to
queston 4)
25 to >19.99 Pts
High Distncton (80%
– 100%)
The behaviours the co
worker engages in (or
fails to engage in) and
the problems these
cause or may cause in
the future are
described and/or
discussed in a
compelling and
sophistcated manner.
All possible
perspectves are
analysed and the
complex connectons
between issues are
identfed and
thoroughly explained.
19.99 to >17.49 Pts
Distncton (70.99% –
70%)
The behaviours the
co-worker engages
in (or fails to engage
in) and the problems
these cause or may
cause in the future
are described and/or
discussed in a well
considered manner
and the complex
connectons
between issues are
identfed and
explained in a
coherent, logical,
and concise manner.
17.49 to >14.99 Pts
Credit (69.99% –
60%)
The behaviours the
co-worker engages in
(or fails to engage in)
and the problems
these cause or may
cause in the future
are consistently
described and/or
discussed.
Connectons
between issues are
acknowledged.
14.99 to >12.49 Pts
Pass (59.99% – 50%)
The behaviours the
co-worker engages in
(or fails to engage in)
and the problems
these cause or may
cause in the future
are inconsistently
described and/or
discussed. Some
connectons between
issues are
acknowledged.
12.
Fai
0%
The
the
eng
fail
in)
pro
cau
cau
fut
we
and
dis

 

MBA6064 Assessment 2 Rubric 2023
Criteria Ratngs
This criterion is
linked to a learning
outcomePreparaton
of the feedback
conversaton
25 to >19.99 Pts
High Distncton (80% –
100%)
Preparaton of the
feedback conversaton was
skilfully and
comprehensively
prepared., The
preparatons include a
clear, focused, highly
relevant and detailed plan
for how to move forward.
19.99 to >17.49 Pts
Distncton (70.99% –
70%)
Preparaton of the
feedback conversaton
was logical and given
careful consideraton in
its preparaton. , The
preparatons include a
thoughtul and
informed plan for how
to move forward.
17.49 to
>14.99 Pts
Credit (69.99% –
60%)
Preparaton of the
feedback
conversaton was
prepared in a
sound manner and
include a plan for
how to move
forward
14.99 to
>12.49 Pts
Pass (59.99% –
50%)
The
preparaton of
the feedback
conversaton
was adequate.
12
Fa
0%
Th
co
wa
pre

 

MBA6064 Assessment 2 Rubric 2023
Criteria Ratngs
This criterion is
linked to a learning
outcomeCritcal
Thinking and
Reflecton
25 to >19.99 Pts
High Distncton (80% –
100%)
Reflectons and
evaluatons are deeply
considered. They are
critcal, sophistcated,
comprehensive, and
systematcally organised.
All conclusions are well
informed and logically
supported by a rigorous
analysis of the feedback
process.
19.99 to
>17.49 Pts
Distncton
(70.99% – 70%)
Reflectons and
evaluatons are
thoroughly
considered. They
are logical,
specifc, and well
organised.
Conclusions are
logical and
supported by a
strong analysis of
the feedback
process.
17.49 to
>14.99 Pts
Credit (69.99% –
60%)
Reflectons and
evaluatons are
thoughtul,
relevant, and
consistent.
Conclusions are
consistently
supported by an
analysis of the
feedback
process.
14.99 to >12.49 Pts
Pass (59.99% – 50%)
Reflectons and
evaluatons are sound.
Conclusions are
inconsistently supported
by the analysis of the
feedback process.
Reflectons and
evaluatons are sound,
generally clear and
relevant. Few
conclusions are
generally supported by
an analysis of the
feedback process.
12.
Fail
0%)
Refl
eva
vag
logi
sup
the
and
of f
ana
This criterion is
linked to a learning
outcomeUse of
resources from the
unit (e.g., readings,
videos, slides)
25 to >19.99 Pts
High Distncton (80% –
100%)
Makes comprehensive,
detailed, and targeted
use of unit resources to
compellingly support the
line of reasoning
throughout the
assessment.
19.99 to >17.49 Pts
Distncton (70.99% –
70%)
Makes thorough,
logical, and relevant
use of unit resources
to provide strong
support to the line of
reasoning throughout
the assessment.
17.49 to >14.99 Pts
Credit (69.99% –
60%)
Consistently makes
use of relevant unit
resources to provide
support to the line
of reasoning the
throughout
assessment.
14.99 to >12.49 Pts
Pass (59.99% –
50%)
Inconsistently
makes use of
appropriate unit
resources to
support the line of
reasoning.
12
>0
Fa
0%
Do
us
res
su
lin
rea

 

MBA6064 Assessment 2 Rubric 2023
Criteria Ratngs
Total points: 100

 

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,