Demonstrate and apply knowledge of ethical and legal principles

134 views 9:31 am 0 Comments June 29, 2023

Assessment 3: Essay Report (50%) [final]

Performance Descriptors
Criteria 7 (100 – 85%) 6 (84 – 75%) 5 (74 – 65%) 4 (64 – 50%) 3-1 (49 – 0%)
SE 5.1 Demonstrate and apply knowledge of ethical and legal principles and practices of business in critically analysing and effectively responding to complex business issues.
Examination of
scenarios using
deontological
frameworks [10 marks]		 Comprehensively and critically
examines each scenario using a range
of deontological frameworks.		 Examines each scenario using a range
of deontological frameworks.		 Examines each scenario using a
selection of deontological
frameworks, focusing on those that
align with own ethical framework.		 Examines each scenario using a
limited range of deontological
frameworks.		 Does not examine each scenario
using deontological frameworks.
SE 5.2 Demonstrate and apply knowledge of socially responsible behaviour in analysing and addressing business issues and critically reflect on the responsibilities and impacts of organisations in national and
international business contexts.
Examination of
scenarios using
consequentialist
frameworks
[10 marks]		 Comprehensively and critically
examines each scenario using a range
of consequentialist frameworks.		 Examines each scenario using a range
of consequentialist frameworks.		 Examines each scenario using a
selection of consequentialist
frameworks, focusing on those that
align with own ethical framework.		 Examines each scenario using a
limited range of consequentialist
frameworks.		 Does not examine each scenario
using consequentialist
frameworks.
HO 2.2 Exercise creativity and intellectual independence and make informed decisions and judgements in planning, designing, and executing strategic and research-based responses to address real world issues
and problems.
Recommendations
[10 marks]		 Makes a clear and compelling case for a
specific course of action (one scenario).
Supports recommendation by
comparing its merits and costs with
those of other scenarios. Justifies
recommendation with evidence from
academic and other reliable sources.		 Makes a strong case for a specific
course of action (one scenario).
Supports recommendation by
comparing its merits and costs with
those of some other scenarios. Justifies
recommendation with evidence from
academic and other reliable sources.		 Makes a case for a specific course of
action (one scenario), clearly
identifying benefits. Supports
recommendation with evidence from
academic and other reliable sources.		 Recommends a specific course of
action (one scenario), outlining
some reasons for its selection.
Supports recommendation with
limited evidence from academic
and other reliable sources.		 May fence site or make a
recommendation with minimal
justification or support from the
literature. Recommendation
may be at odds with earlier
discussion or case.
TS 4.1 Exercise self-reflection and accountability in applying knowledge and skills for own learning and effective practice.
Reflection
[10 marks]		 Critically compares the recommended
action for the company in relation to
your own ethical values and virtues.
Clearly articulates plans for dealing with
future potential conflict in values.		 Examines the recommended action for
the company in relation to your own
ethical values and virtues. Articulates
future plans for dealing with conflicts
in values.		 Compares the recommended action
for the company in relation to your
own ethical values and virtues.
Discusses future plans for dealing with
conflicts in values.		 Mentions the recommended
action for the company in
relation to your own ethical
values and virtues. Mentions
future plans for dealing with
conflicts in values.		 Does not discuss the
recommended action for the
company in relation to your own
ethical values and virtues. Does
not mention future plans for
dealing with conflicts in values.
PC 3.1 Use information literacy skills and communicate effectively and professionally in written forms and using media appropriate for diverse purposes, contexts and audiences.
Professional
communication
[10 marks]		 Writing is professional, well- structured
and persuasive. Fluent, coherent and
concise writing style.
Meaning is consistently clear with a
very high level of attention to grammar,
syntax and spelling.		 Writing is well-structured, and mostly
professional. There may be minor
problems with flow or conciseness.
Meaning is clear with high level of
attention to grammar, syntax and
spelling.		 Writing is generally well- structured
though there are minor lapses in the
use of business language. Shows
organisation and coherence. Overall
meaning is clear with attention paid
to grammar, syntax and spelling with
some minor errors.		 There is an attempt at structure.
Content is somewhat organised,
but there are some problems
with fluency, conciseness or use
of business language. The
intended meaning can be
discerned.		 Writing lacks structure,
coherence and organisation.
Use of language fails to make
meaning clear with many errors
of grammar, syntax and spelling.

 

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,