EDU206 Critical Education in a Global World
Podcast interview (25%) 1000 words
Assessment Task 1 rubric
Student name:
Lecturer: Claudine Lam
| Criteria | N (0-49) | P (50-59%) | C (60-69%) | D (70-79%) | HD (80-100%) |
| Overview of chosen key figure. (15%) |
An inadequate or irrelevant overview of the key figure has been provided. |
An attempt has been made provide a relevant overview of the key figure. |
A sound overview of the key figure has been provided. |
A relevant overview of the key figure has been provided. |
A concise and sophisticated overview of the key figure has been provided. |
| Summary of two publications or other works by chosen key figure. (20%) |
An inadequate or irrelevant summary of publications has been provided. |
An attempt has been made to provide a summary of publications. |
A sound summary that articulates areas of agreement and disagreement has been provided. |
A relevant summary that is clearly linked to articulations of agreement and disagreement has been provided. |
A concise summary that is linked in a sophisticated way to articulations of agreement and disagreement has been provided. |
| Clear connections to how the ideas of the chosen key figure connect to social identity and educational experiences. (20%) |
Inadequate or irrelevant connections between ideas, social identity and educational experiences have been provided. |
An attempt has been made to provide connections between ideas, social identity and educational experiences. |
A sound discussion of connections between ideas, social identity and educational experiences has been provided. |
A relevant discussion of connections between ideas, social identity and educational experiences has been provided. |
A sophisticated discussion of connections between ideas, social identity and educational experiences has been provided. |
| Critical question and rationale implications for asking this question. (15%) |
An inadequate or irrelevant critical question has been provided. |
An attempt has been made to provide a critical question. |
A sound critical question with an attempt to link to a rationale and implications has been provided. |
A relevant critical question that is clearly linked to a rationale and implications has been provided. |
A sophisticated critical question that is relevant and concisely linked a rationale and implications has been provided. |
| Quality of interview format and style. (10%) |
Appears to be hesitant in the interview; no confidence with the material. |
Appears to be hesitant in the interview; attempts to make engage confidently with the material. |
Speaks with some clarity and is mostly confident with the material. |
Speaks clearly; engages with the interviewer and is at ease with the presentation material. |
Speaks with clarity and confidence; engages and interacts with the interviewer and engages thoughtfully with presentation material. |
| Individual script (15%) | No individual script provided. | An attempt has been made to provide an individual script. |
A sound individual script has been provided. |
A strong, relevant script has been provided. |
A succinct and sophisticated script has been provided. |
| Reference page using APA 7 formatting style. (5%) |
Copied material, no citations included. APA 7 referencing not used. |
Uses APA 7 referencing inconsistently. Relevance of references is unclear. |
Uses APA 7 referencing, may display some inconsistences. Draws on relevant references. |
Is properly referenced using APA 7 and formatting is consistent and mostly correct. Draws on relevant and useful references. |
Uses APA 7 formatting and referencing style consistently. Draws on relevant and useful references that reflect academic integrity. |
Further comments:
Late penalty: N/A
Final grade: