Module Number: BMP5001
Module Name: Business Management & Career Development
Year/Trimester/Cohort: 2022-23/ Semester 2/ September 2022 Cohort
Module Tutor/s: Fidel Gonzalez/ Syed Bukhari/ Anil Batra/ Chisomje Ezeaku/ Nwayobuije Martins Major/ Mubashir Qurashi/ Raju SaginalaMicroeconomics Assignment
|
Assessment Number |
2 |
|
Assessment Type (and weighting) |
Written Report – 50% (4000 words) |
|
Assessment Name |
WBL Mini Project Report |
|
Assessment Submission Date |
Sunday 04 June 2023 at 23:59 |
Learning Outcomes Assessed:
LO2: Identify an appropriate business management issue and plan a research project to address this
LO3: Apply an effective research approach to a mini project
LO4: Appraise key research findings and make appropriate recommendations
Assessment Brief:
As part of this module, you are required to complete up to 200 hours work based learning (WBL) on a placement in an appropriate (local) organisation. This assignment seeks to capture the results of the WBL activity in the form of a formal report, treating the placement as a practical research project.
Working with your main contact(s) at your selected WBL placement provider, you are to:
agree a suitable ‘business’ subject area for investigation
identify a specific question of interest / value to the employer
undertake secondary / academic / desk-based research into the subject
investigate the question in the context of the employer organisation
develop informed conclusions and recommendations from your ‘research’
present your findings back to the employer
write a 4000-word formal report on the research project completed during your WBL placement.
Your report should be appropriately formatted, using the approach discussed in taught sessions during the module and reflecting the highly applied nature of your research, especially as this relates to the sponsoring WBL placement organisation.
As a minimum, you should include the following separate sections, which are outlined for guidance:
1 Front page (Not part of the word count) – Your student ID, the name of your WBL Placement organisation, The title of your WBL placement project (e.g. How can Social Media Help Olympus Fish Bar Find More Customers?”, the Module number (BMP5001) and the words ‘Assignment 2 – Mini Project Report’
2 Contents Page (Not part of the word count) (including page numbers for each section, but not sub sections)
3 Acknowledgement (Not part of the word count) – Please write a short note of thanks to your main contact(s) within your WBL Placement organisation, for their help in making your WBL journey possible
4 Section 1– Introduction (250-300 words) Use this section to set the scene for your WBL placement, describing your WBL placement organisation, what they do, and how you came to undertake your placement with this organisation. Explain what general business subject your placement was focussed on (e.g. marketing, finance, HR etc) and who were the main people you worked with during the placement.
5 Section 2 – WBL Question, Aim and Objectives (200-300 words) Use this section to identify the specific question that you set out initially to find answers to in your placement. Explain the general aim of your research and identify up to three specific / SMART objectives that you agreed with your WBL placement sponsor (these should have been set out in your ToR for Assignment 1)
6 Section 3 – Secondary Research / Mini-Literature Review (1500-1800 words). Use this section to present your findings from having researched the subject area using relevant academic sources (journals, books etc) and any documents provided to you by your WBL placement organisation (reports, manuals, policies, procedures, marketing materials etc.). In terms of your academic research you should aim to include at least 10 sources to demonstrate that you have connected your research question to relevant theory. You should aim to present key issues, themes, theories, models, graphics (pictures explaining theory), writers and their ideas within this section, and link these to your WBL question, aims and objectives.
7 Section 4 – Primary Research (1000-1200 words). Use this section to explain how you went about collecting information & data from your WBL placement provider. Explain why you chose to collect particular information and the reasons for using the sources that you obtained the information from. Explain the relevance and effectiveness of the data collection tools / techniques you used (e.g., questionnaire, interview, document analysis) and identify any limitations or constraints that affected the quality of the data you were able to collect. Consider how you might approach this part of your research differently if you were to undertake the project again.
8 Section 5 – Evaluation (500-600 words) Use this section to explore your research question in terms of how well it enabled you to learn about the particular aspect of business from an academic (secondary) perspective. What were the most important / insightful / surprising things / findings to come out of your secondary research – why & how were these important / insightful / surprising to you? Comment on how the secondary research informed your thinking about the subject in the context of your WBL placement organisation. How did what you found at the employer site compare to what you read in the literature? Would you modify the question now, knowing what you now know about the subject, the industry context and the employer? Add any further comments as appropriate about things you observed during your placement.
9 Section 6 – Conclusions and Recommendations (250-300 words). Use this section to set out any conclusions arising from the work you undertook during your placement and from the research you completed (secondary and primary). Make sure that any comments you set out are properly supported by ‘evidence’ you include in your report and that they link appropriately to the research question, aims and objectives you started out with (or ended up with, if these changed during your project!). Likewise, with recommendations, make sure that there is a logical link to the content of your report, so that these appear to be supported by clear evidence. Set out any ‘Next Steps’ you believe should be taken following the completion of your WBL placement.
10 Reflective Statement (300-400 words) Use this section to outline what you have gained from undertaking the assignment. Consider aspects such as how your thinking has changed around the research process, undertaking project work, the industry in which your WBL placement took place, your perceptions of the WBL employer where you did your placement and in particular, how you have changed personally as a result of the placement.
11 Appendices (Not part of your word count) Use this section to list any sources used in compiling your report, including academic sources (journals, research papers, books, articles etc.) and materials gathered from your WBL placement provider (e.g., manuals, guides, marketing materials, leaflets, policies, letters, email correspondence etc). In addition, please include a clean copy of any research tools used in your project, such as questionnaires, structured / semi-structured interview scripts.
Marking Guide- Your Report will be assessed using the following guide:
|
Report Element / Aspect |
Marks Available |
|
1 Introduction |
10 |
|
2 WBL Question, Aim and Objectives |
10 |
|
3 Secondary Research / Mini Literature Review |
25 |
|
4 Primary Research / the employer context |
10 |
|
5 Findings and Evaluation |
15 |
|
6 Conclusions and Recommendations |
10 |
|
7 Reflective Statement |
10 |
|
8 Document Formatting & Presentation |
5 |
|
9 Academic Quality, writing style, Referencing |
5 |
General Assessment Criteria for Written Assessments – HE5
|
% |
Relevance |
Knowledge |
Argument/Analysis |
Structure |
Presentation |
Academic Writing |
Research/Referencing |
|
|
Class I Quality) |
85-100 |
Directly relevant to title. Expertly addresses the assumptions and/or the requirements of the brief. |
Demonstrates an exceptional knowledge/understanding of theory and practice for this level through the identification and critical analysis of the most important issues and themes. |
Makes exceptional use of appropriate arguments and/or theoretical models. Demonstrates some distinctive or independent thinking. Presents an exceptional critical analysis of the material resulting in clear, logical and original conclusions. |
Coherently articulated and logically structured. An appropriate format is used. |
The presentational style & layout is correct for the type of assignment. Effective inclusion of figures, tables, plates (FTP). |
An exceptionally well written answer with standard spelling and grammar. Style is clear, resourceful and academic. |
Sources accurately cited in the text. A wide range of contemporary and relevant references cited in the reference list in the correct style. |
|
Class I Quality) |
70-84 |
Directly relevant to title. Addresses the assumptions and/or the requirements of the brief. |
Demonstrates an excellent knowledge/understanding of theory and practice for this level through the identification and analysis of the most important issues and themes. |
Makes creative use of appropriate arguments and/or theoretical models. Presents an excellent analysis of the material resulting in clear, logical conclusions. |
Coherently articulated and logically structured. An appropriate format is used. |
The presentational style & layout is correct for the type of assignment. Effective inclusion of figures, tables, plates (FTP). |
An excellently written |
Sources accurately cited in the text. A range of contemporary and relevant references cited in the reference list in the correct style. |
|
Class II/i |
60-69 |
Directly relevant to title. Addresses most of the assumptions and/or the requirements of the brief. |
Demonstrates a very good knowledge/understanding of theory and practice for this level through the identification and analysis of key issues. |
Uses sound arguments or theoretical models. Presents a clear and valid analysis of the material in the main with clear, logical conclusions. |
Logically constructed in the main. An appropriate format is used. |
The presentational style & layout is correct for the type of assignment. Effective inclusion of FTP. |
A very well written answer with standard spelling and grammar. Style is clear and academic. |
Sources accurately cited in the text and a range of appropriate references cited in reference list in the correct style. |
|
Class II/ii |
50-59 |
Generally addresses the brief, but sometimes considers irrelevant issues. |
Demonstrates a good knowledge/understanding of theory and practice for this level through the identification and analysis of some key issues. |
Presents largely coherent arguments. Evidence of attempted analysis, with some descriptive or narrative passages. Conclusions are fairly clear and logical. |
For the most part coherently articulated and logically structured. An acceptable format is used. |
The presentational style & layout is correct for the type of assignment. Inclusion of FTP but lacks selectivity. |
Competently written with minor lapses in spelling and grammar. Style is readable and academic in the main. |
Most sources accurately cited in the text and an appropriate reference list is provided which is largely in the correct style. |
|
Class III |
40-49 |
Some degree of irrelevance to the brief. Superficial consideration of the issues. |
Demonstrates an adequate knowledge/understanding of theory and practice for this level. An attempt is made to analyse key issues. |
Presents basic arguments, but focus and consistency lacking in places. Issues are vaguely stated. Descriptive or narrative passages evident which lack clear purpose. Conclusions are not always clear or logical. |
Adequate attempt at articulation and logical structure. An acceptable format is used. |
The presentational style & layout is largely correct for the type of assignment. Inappropriate use of FTP or not used where clearly needed to aid understanding. |
Generally competently written although intermittent lapses in grammar and spelling pose obstacles for the reader. Style limits communication and is non-academic in a number of places. |
Some relevant sources cited. Some weaknesses in referencing technique. |
|
Borderline Fail |
35-39 |
Significant degree of irrelevance to the brief. Only most obvious issues are addressed at a superficial level and in unchallenging terms. |
Demonstrates weaknesses in knowledge of theory and practice for this level, with poor understanding of key issues. |
Limited argument, which is descriptive or narrative in style with little evidence of analysis. Conclusions are neither clear nor logical. |
Poorly structured. Lack of articulation. Format deficient. |
For the type of assignment the presentational style &/or layout is lacking. FTP ignored in text or not used where clearly needed. |
Deficiencies in spelling and grammar makes reading difficult. Simplistic or repetitious style impairs clarity. Style is non-academic. |
Limited sources and weak referencing. |
|
Fail |
<34 |
Relevance to the brief is intermittent or missing. The topic is reduced to its vaguest and least challenging terms. |
Demonstrates a lack of basic knowledge of either theory or practice for this level, with little evidence of understanding. |
Inadequate arguments and no analysis. Conclusions are sparse. |
Unstructured. Lack of articulation. Format deficient |
For the type of assignment the presentational style &/or layout is lacking. FTP as above. |
Poorly written with numerous deficiencies in grammar, spelling and expression. Style is non-academic. |
An absence of academic sources and poor referencing technique. |