Assignment Overview

114 views 9:07 am 0 Comments June 22, 2023

1

Assignment Overview
This assignment is designed to enable you to present your findings from assignment 1 in the form of a
poster.
This assignment has been designed to provide you with an opportunity to demonstrate your
achievement of the following module learning outcomes:
LO 1 Demonstrate an ability to undertake a project involving plan, execute, analyse findings, and draw
conclusions for an investigation with specified aims and objectives identified.
LO 2 Use information collected from a range of sources and use of appropriate methods to address the
stated aims and objectives of the investigation
LO 3 Develop and demonstrate academic writing and communication skills to present the project in
written and visual formats.
Assignment Task and Requirements
WHAT ARE YOU ASKED TO DO?
Building on the work you have carried out in assignment 1, design a poster that informs us about
your business project.
This task will require you to:
1. Use the same business project that you discussed in Assignment One.
2. Download the Power Point template found on Moodle.
3. Present the data and information collected from your research for Assignment One following
subheadings presented below. Use graphs, tables, maps, logos, images, numbers, bullet points
and short texts to equivalent of 1,500 words.
4. Submit your poster electronically. No presentation is required.
5. Only use resources outlined in the reading list.

 

Module code
and title:
Foundation Year Project
(MGBBT0FYP)
Module leader: Habib Niazi
Assignment
type:
Poster (equivalent to 1,500
words)
Assessment
weighting:
50%
Submission
due dates:
To be submitted not later than
14:00,2
6th May 2023
Feedback
Target:
3 weeks from submission

2

Assignment Guide and Format
Your poster needs to include the following sub-headings:
Business Overview (equivalent of 150 words)
o Briefly describe your business.
Industry Analysis (equivalent of 200 words)
o Describe the size of the Tourism industry, its characteristics, its future potential. Use graphs,
bullet points, key numbers, and images. Use information from Visit Britain/travel-trade.
Market Trends (equivalent of 100 words)
o Identify market trends in the Tourism industry in the UK. For example, increase in domestic
travel, corporate travel trends, accessibility of travelling.
Competitors (equivalent of 150 words)
o Identify three-four of your main competitors (direct or indirect). Include a map of the location
of your business and mark where your main competitors are. Include their websites in the
reference list.
Suppliers (equivalent of 150 words)
o Identify your suppliers (where you will purchase the inventory needed to produce your
product/service offering). For example, airlines or coach hiring, stationary, car, printing the
brochures etc.
Target clientele (equivalent of 100 words)
o Identify and describe your target clients, what they like doing, their approximate age and
income, life style, and other important demographics.
SWOT Analysis (equivalent of 150 words)
o Using a table, identify strengths and weaknesses of your business (internal) and
opportunities and threats (external).
Marketing Mix (equivalent of 150 words)
o Using a table, identify and describe the Four P’s of Marketing (this is called Marketing Mix)
for your business: Product, Price, Place (Location or Distribution) and Promotion
(advertising).
Digital Applications / Business Software (equivalent of 100 words)
o Research and identify the business software and applications you will need to run your
business (for example, to collect payments or to prepare invoices). You may include the
price or subscription fees, their advantages, or key features.

3

Financial Aspects (equivalent of 150 words)
o Include one financial aspect of your choice: initial investment numbers (facilities,
equipment, supply costs), pro-forma income statement, estimates of sales; sources of
financing, working capital, ratios, breakeven point, etc). Use graphs, tables, key numbers,
or other visuals.
Conclusion (equivalent of 100 words)
o Summarize your findings and explain why you think that your project will be successful.
Refences: minimum 10 references. You must only use the resources outlined below.
Core Resources
Core texts:
1. Fletcher, J., Fyall, A., Gilbert, D., Wanhill, S. (2018) Tourism: principles and practice. Harlow:
Person Education.
2. Madura, J. (2007) Introduction to Business. 4th edn. Thomson Higher Education. Available in
Additional Resources in Moodle.
3. Fullen, S.L. and Podmoroff, D. (2006)
How to write a great business plan for your small business in
60 minutes or less
. Ocala: Atlantic Publishing Company.
4. Griffin, M.P. (2015)
How to Write a Business Plan: A Step-by-Step Guide to Creating a Plan That
Gets Results
: AMA Self-Study.
5. Murray, J.W. (2008).
The Complete Guide to Writing Effective and Award-Winning Business
Proposals: Step-by-Step Instructions
. Ocala: Atlantic Publishing Company.
6. Altinay, L., Paraskevas, A. and Jang, S. (2016)
Planning research in hospitality and tourism. Second
edition. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
7. McKeever, M. (2018)
How to Write a Business Plan. Berkeley, California: NOLO.
8. Saunders, M., Lewis, P., Thornhill, A. (2012)
Research methods for business students. 6th ed.
Essex: Financial Times, Prentice Hall.
9. Tracy, B. (2014)
Marketing. New York: AMACOM (Brian Tracy Success Library).

4

10. MarketLine Industry Profile: Travel & Tourism in United Kingdom’ (2023) Travel & Tourism
Industry Profile: United Kingdom, pp. 1–80.
Websites
National Careers Service
Visitbritain.org/travel-trade
Bloomberg Businessweek
The Financial Times
Trading economics
ONS (Office for National Statistics)
World bank data
Companies’ websites
Statista (open access)
Google maps and reviews
Harvard business review (magazine)
Referencing and research requirements
Please reference your work according to the Canterbury Harvard Referencing style guidance. You can
access this on Moodle.
For each reference used, provide the full Harvard reference within your references section and the core
in-text citation if you are referencing something in your text. Have a minimum 10 different references.
For academic research, include both direct and indirect citations only from the recommended
materials outlined above. For marketing research, include references from an array of websites:
competitor companies, Visit Britain, ONS and National Careers Services, suppliers, and other
relevant sources.
How your work will be assessed
Your work will be assessed on the extent to which it demonstrates your achievement of the stated
learning outcomes for this assignment (see above) and against other key criteria, like
content, design
and layout, and graphics
, as defined in the University’s institutional grading descriptors. If it is
appropriate to the format of your assignment and your subject area, a proportion of your marks will also
depend upon your use of academic referencing conventions.
This assignment will be marked according to the grading descriptors for Level 0

5

See attached grid for grade descriptors.
Submission details
This assignment should be submitted electronically via Moodle.
Please ensure that your work has been saved in an appropriate file format: only Microsoft Word –
No other format will be accepted.
You can submit your work as many times as you like before the submission date. If you do submit
your work more than once, your earlier submission will be replaced by the most recent version.
Once you have submitted your work, you will receive a digital receipt as proof of submission,
which will be sent to your forwarded e-mail address (provided you have set this up). Please keep
this receipt for future reference, along with the original electronic copy of your assignment.
You are reminded of the University’s regulations on academic misconduct, which can be viewed
on the University website: Academic Misconduct Policy. In submitting your assignment, you are
acknowledging that you have read and understood these regulations.
The Assessment Front Sheet (see the Template in Moodle) should be inserted as the first page
for all assessments submitted by a student to Global Banking School (GBS). GBS reserves the
right to not mark any assessment that is not submitted with this sheet attached and that does not
comply with the requirements below.
It is the complete and sole responsibility of the student to upload their assessment to Turnitin for
Marking prior to the specified deadline.
Assessment Filename – All uploads need to be submitted using the naming convention below:

Assessment
type
Format Example
Individual
Assessment
[A&F or B&T] [GBS ID] [Forename] [Surname] B&T 1234567
Jane Smith
Group
Assessment
[A&F or B&T] [GBS ID] [Forename] [Surname] [Group
Number]
B&T 1234567
Jane Smith
Group 5

To avoid uploading issues students should aim to upload their assessment several hours prior to
the deadline to avoid Turnitin issues around the deadline time or accidentally submitting to the
wrong submission link. It is recommended to check that the assessment that has been uploaded
is able to be read after you have uploaded it and if not to re-upload it. Contact the SST on your
campus if you have any issues.
Students should not request lecturers to submit assessments on their behalf as they are unable to
do so.

6

Any assessment submitted after the specified deadline will incur a late penalty as specified in
CCCU Academic regulations unless prior approval has been granted for Exceptional
Circumstances.

7

Provision at Level 3 (often forming part of a Foundation Year course) is designed to prepare students for higher education. At the end of Level 3, students will
be expected to demonstrate the acquisition of foundation level skills, knowledge and understanding necessary to embark on a higher education programme of
study at Level 4. In accordance with the national Qualifications and Credit Framework (QCF), this includes the ability to identify and use relevant
understanding, methods and skills to complete tasks and address problems that, while well defined, have a measure of complexity. It includes taking
responsibility for initiating and completing tasks and procedures as well as exercising autonomy and judgement within limited parameters. It also reflects
awareness of different perspectives or approaches within an area of study or work.
A pass mark (40% or above) demonstrates achievement of all learning outcomes associated with the module assessment
Assessment category
Introductory knowledge
and understanding of the
basic underlying
concepts and principles
of the subject(s)
Cognitive and intellectual
skills
Reading and referencing Presentation, style and
structure
Work that significantly exceeds
the specified word limit may be
penalized
Pass Mark 90%-100% Excellent work showing
flawless understanding of
the basic underlying
concepts and principles of
the subject(s), resulting in
students being fully
prepared for study at Level
4.
Insightful and accurate
interpretation and evaluation
of information and ideas,
based on an excellent
application of the most
appropriate skills, methods
and procedures. Work shows
full awareness of the nature of
the area of study and different
perspectives or approaches
within it
Insightful and effective use of a
carefully selected range of
relevant reading. Consistently
accurate application of
referencing.
Exemplary presentation of work
that is fluent and flawless
throughout.

8

80%-89% High quality work showing
fluent understanding of the
basic underlying concepts
and principles of the
subject(s), resulting in
students being fully
prepared for study at Level
4.
Excellent interpretation and
evaluation of information and
ideas, employing highly
appropriate skills, methods
and procedures. Work shows
strong awareness of the
nature of the area of study
and different perspectives or
approaches within it
Consistent and balanced
engagement with a refined
selection of many types of
relevant reading. Consistently
accurate application of
referencing.
Highly effective presentation of
work that is coherently structured
and clearly expressed
throughout.
70% – 79% Commendable work
showing detailed
understanding of the basic
underlying concepts and
principles of the subject(s),
resulting in students being
highly prepared for study
at Level 4.
Effective interpretation and
evaluation of information and
ideas, showing effective use
of appropriate skills, methods
and procedures. Work shows
well established awareness of
the nature of the area of study
and different perspectives or
approaches within it.
Consistent engagement with a
wide range of relevant reading.
Consistently accurate application
of referencing.
Well-formed presentation of work
that is coherently structured and
clearly expressed throughout.
60% – 69% Work of solid quality
showing competent and
consistent understanding
of the basic underlying
concepts and principles of
the subject(s), resulting in
students being well
prepared for study at Level
4.
Good interpretation and
evaluation of information and
ideas, using appropriate skills,
methods and procedures.
Work shows sound
awareness of the nature of
the area of study and different
perspectives or approaches
within it.
Engagement with a wide range of
relevant reading. Sound
application of referencing, with no
inaccuracies or inconsistencies.
Competent presentation of work
in terms of structure and clarity of
expression.

9

Level 3 Introductory knowledge Cognitive and intellectual
skills
Reading and referencing Presentation, style and
structure
Pass mark 50% – 59% Adequate work showing
understanding of the basic
underlying concepts and
principles of the subject(s),
resulting in students being
prepared for study at Level
4, but lacking depth and
breadth.
Adequate interpretation and
evaluation of information and
ideas, largely using
appropriate skills, methods
and procedures. Work shows
awareness of the nature of the
area of study and an emerging
awareness of different
perspectives or approaches
within it.
Engagement with an appropriate
range of reading beyond essential
texts. Referencing may show
minor inaccuracies or
inconsistencies.
Work is structured in a largely
coherent manner and is for the
most part clearly expressed.
40% – 49% Simple factual approach
showing understanding of
the basic underlying
concepts and principles of
the subject(s), resulting in
students being largely
prepared for study at Level
4. Narrow or misguided
selection of material, with
elements missing or
inaccurate.
A limited interpretation and
evaluation of information and
ideas, showing emerging
awareness of the nature of the
area of study and different
perspectives or approaches
within it, although not always
logical or coherent and with
inaccuracies.
Evidence of reading, largely
confined to essential texts, but
mainly reliant on taught elements.
Referencing may show
inaccuracies and/or
inconsistencies.
Ordered presentation in which
relevant ideas / concepts are
reasonably expressed.
Marginal fail 35% – 39% Work shows limited but
fragmentary understanding
of the basic underlying
concepts and principles of
the subject(s), for example
through inaccuracies,
inclusion of irrelevant
material and/or absence of
appropriate information.
Weak and at times flawed
interpretation and evaluation of
information and ideas,
resulting in largely descriptive
work that shows lack of
awareness of the nature of the
area of study and different
perspectives or approaches
within it.
Poor engagement with essential
texts and no evidence of wider
reading. Heavily reliant on taught
elements. Inconsistent and weak
use of referencing.
Work is loosely, and at times
incoherently, structured, with
information and ideas often poorly
expressed.
Fail 20% –
34%
Unsatisfactory work
showing weak and flawed
understanding of the basic
Very weak interpretation and
evaluation of information and
ideas, resulting in descriptive
Limited evidence of reading
and/or reliance on inappropriate
sources. Limited engagement with
Work is poorly presented in a
disjointed and incoherent manner.
Information and ideas are very

10

underlying concepts and
principles of the subject(s),
for example through
serious inaccuracies,
inclusion of a significant
amount of irrelevant
material and/or absence of
appropriate information.
work that is often illogical,
invalid or irrelevant. Little
awareness of the nature of the
area of study and no
appreciation of different
perspectives or approaches
within it.
taught elements. Very poor use of
referencing.
poorly expressed, with weak
English and/or inappropriate style.
< 20% Highly unsatisfactory work
showing major gaps in
understanding of the basic
underlying concepts and
principles of the subject(s).
Inclusion of largely
irrelevant material, absence
of appropriate information
and significant
inaccuracies.
Work is largely irrelevant or
inaccurate, characterised by
descriptive text and
unsubstantiated
generalisations. Minimal or no
use of evidence to back up
views, showing complete lack
of awareness of the nature of
the area of study and different
perspectives or approaches
within it.
No evidence of reading or
engagement with taught
elements. Absent or incoherent
referencing.
Work is extremely disorganised,
with much of the content
confusingly expressed. Very poor
English and/or very inappropriate
style.

 

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,