Mental Health and Wellbeing

95 views 9:10 am 0 Comments August 19, 2023

1
HNN301 Mental Health and Wellbeing
Trimester 2 2023
Assessment Task 1: Written Assignment
2000 words
Purpose of assessment task
Nursing is a highly rewarding profession and there are multiple workplace factors that have a
positive impact on registered nurses’ mental health and wellbeing. However, there are also
workplace factors that can have a negative impact on nurses’ mental health and wellbeing. As per
the Nursing and Midwifery Board of Australia’s Code of Conduct (2018), registered nurses are
obligated to promote their own and their colleagues’ health and wellbeing to ensure safe and quality
care.
In addition to developing self-awareness regarding your own mental health and wellbeing, and the
workplace factors that can impact this; it is important that you have an understanding of
contemporary factors that impact mental health and wellbeing amongst populations.
This assessment task provides you with an opportunity to examine and reflect upon burnout in the
general population and in the nursing profession (ULO1).
This assessment task will assist you with AT2, since you will build upon what you have learnt about
burnout in AT2.
Due date: Tuesday 15th August 2023
Time: 8.00pm AEST
Location: Assignment dropbox on HNN301 CloudDeakin unit site
Format: PDF*
*PDF conversion software is available
here on Deakin Software Catalogue
Please check the document before submitting to the dropbox to ensure the formatting has
not changed.
You are responsible for ensuring that the correct version of your assessment task is properly
uploaded into the correct assessment dropbox.

2
Instructions for this assessment task:
Part 1.
This part of the assessment task requires you to discuss burnout in the general population.
In this section you must
discuss burnout including risk factors, signs and symptoms and the impacts
of burnout on mental health and wellbeing.
This section should be around 600 words. This section is not a reflection and therefore you
are required to write this section in the third person. Additionally, you must support this
section with evidence.
Part 2. This part of the assessment task requires you to discuss workplace burnout specific to
nursing and midwifery.
In this section you must
discuss workplace burnout including the workplace factors that increase the
risk of burnout in nurses and midwives, signs and symptoms of workplace burnout in nurses and
midwives and the impacts of workplace burnout on nurses’ and midwives.
This section should be around 600 words. This section is not a reflection and therefore you
are required to write this section in the third person. Additionally, you must support this
section with evidence.
Part 3. This part of the assessment task requires you to reflect upon what you have learnt in Part 1
and 2.
You must
reflect upon one (1) workplace factor that may increase your risk of workplace burnout.
You may use the following questions to assist you with this element of your reflection.
These
questions are intended to be used as a guide only and you are not required to reflect upon each
question.
What is it about this workplace factor that may increase your risk of workplace burnout?
How does this workplace factor impact you and your mental health and wellbeing?
How might workplace burnout impact your nursing/midwifery practice?
How would you notice workplace burnout in yourself?
How would you manage workplace burnout if you experienced it?
This section should be around 400-500 words.
Important note: The workplace factor and strategy you reflect upon must have been discussed in
Part 2. Since this section is a reflection, you must write in the first person. You need to include
references in this section.
References
You need to include literature to support your discussion of the strategies to promote your mental
health and wellbeing. References need to be no older than ten years unless they are seminal work.
Government websites are appropriate in addition to the resources listed in your reading list.

3
However, references to’.com’ websites and/or Wikipedia are not appropriate for this assessment
task.
Presentation requirements:
Title Page:
Include the following information on separate lines; Title of Paper (bold font), Student
Name/s, Student Number, University/Institution Name, Unit Code and Name, Facilitator
Name, Due Date, Word count
Formatting of Title Page: Centred text alignment and double-line spacing.
Font:
12-point type size Times New Roman.
Ensure the same font is used consistently throughout the entire paper.
Spacing:
Double-line spacing (Do not insert extra lines between paragraphs or the references list
entries.)
Page numbers
Page numbers to be provided on all pages. Place page number in the top right hand corner
Margins
2.54 cm at the top, bottom, left-hand, and right-hand sides of the page (default page
margin)
.
Paragraph indents
Indent the first line of each paragraph 1.27 cm (using the tab key or paragraph tool).
Exceptions: abstract, block quotations, title page (centred alignment), titles and headings,
table titles and notes, references (hanging indent), appendix labels and titles
(Consult with APA 7 style manual for specific detail).
Justification of text
All text needs to be aligned to the left, not justified (right margin remains uneven)
Word Count
Assignments must be no more than 10% above or below the indicated word count, not
including title page, in-text citations and reference list.
Headings
Do not use headings for this assessment task.
Introduction and conclusion
You must include an introduction and conclusion. Each should be around 200 words.
Referencing Style
APA 7.
4

Criterion mode: Points High Distinction Distinction Credit Pass Fail
Starting % 80 Starting % 70 Starting % 60 Starting % 50 Starting % 0
Criterion 1
Discusses burnout in the
general population.
Response comprehensively
discusses key aspects of
burnout in the general
population, including risk
factors, signs and
symptoms and impacts.
Response also includes
contextual information.
There is clear and strong
integration of concepts and
synthesis of information.
Response clearly
discusses key aspects of
burnout in the general
population, including risk
factors, signs and
symptoms and impacts.
Concepts are explained
in depth with some
integration of key
concepts.
Responses describes key
aspects of burnout in the
general population,
including risk factors, signs
and symptoms and
impacts. Discussion is
mainly detailed and there
is beginning integration of
concepts. However, the
response is largely
descriptive.
Response provides an
overview of some key
aspects regarding burnout
in the general population,
including risk factors,
signs and symptoms and
impacts. The response is
largely an outline or a
brief description and lacks
detail and depth.
Response does not
demonstrate an
understanding of in
the general
population.
Response may be
lacking in substantial
detail, is irrelevant to
the assignment topic
or there are
significant
inaccuracies
included.
Points 30
Criterion 2
Discusses workplace
burnout specific to nursing
or midwifery.
Response comprehensively
discusses key aspects of
workplace burnout
including workplace
factors, the signs and
symptoms and impacts
relevant to
nursing/midwifery.
Response also includes
contextual information.
There is clear and strong
integration of concepts and
synthesis of information.
Response clearly
discusses key aspects of
workplace burnout,
including workplace
factors, the signs and
symptoms and impacts
relevant to
nursing/midwifery.
Concepts are explained
in depth with some
integration of key
concepts.
Responses describes key
aspects of workplace
burnout, including
workplace factors, the
signs and symptoms and
impacts relevant to
nursing/midwifery.
Discussion is mainly
detailed and there is
beginning integration of
concepts. However, the
response is largely
descriptive.
Response provides an
overview of some key
aspects regarding
workplace burnout
including workplace
factors, the signs and
symptoms and impacts
relevant to
nursing/midwifery. The
response is largely an
outline or a brief
description and lacks
detail and depth.
Response does not
demonstrate an
understanding of
workplace burnout
specific to nursing or
midwifery.
Response may be
lacking in substantial
detail, is irrelevant to
the assignment topic
or there are
significant
inaccuracies
included.
Points 30

5

Criterion 3
Reflects upon one
workplace factor that can
increase the risk of
workplace burnout in self.
Evidence of deep reflection
on one workplace factor.
Reflection is thorough,
comprehensive, detailed
and individual to the
author. There is thorough
integration of concepts and
synthesis of information.
The workplace factor was
discussed in Part 1.
Evidence of reflection on
one workplace factor.
Reflection is thorough
and individual to the
author. There is
integration of concepts.
The workplace factor was
discussed in Part 1.
Evidence of reflection on
one workplace factor.
Reflection is mainly
detailed and mostly
individual to the author.
There are sections where
the reflection reads more
like a description and
integration of concepts
can be developed.
The workplace factor was
discussed in Part 1.
Evidence of some
reflection on one
workplace factor.
Reflection is an overview
and points are mainly
outlined. Reflection is
somewhat individual to
the author, but author but
vague. More detail and
depth are required.
The workplace factor was
discussed in Part 1.
Response does not
demonstrate a
reflection that meets
the standard of this
criterion.
Reflection may be
lacking in substantial
detail, is irrelevant to
the reflection topic
or the entire
response is not
written as a
reflection.
The workplace factor
was not discussed in
Part 1.
Points 20
Criterion 4
Relevant literature
selected and skilfully used
to support discussion.
There is evidence of
thorough research through
the selection of quality
literature. Literature has
been utilised skilfully to
develop a coherent
reflection.
Literature thoroughly
supports the reflection and
there is effective
integration between ideas
and literature.
There is evidence of wide
research through the
selection of mostly
quality literature.
Literature has been
utilised skilfully to
support the claims made.
Literature mostly
supports the reflection
and there is an attempt
to integrate ideas and
literature.
There is evidence of
sufficient research through
the selection of mostly
quality literature.
Literature mainly supports
the claims made.
Literature mainly supports
the reflection.
The quality of the
literature selected is
mostly adequate.
Literature has been
utilised to support the
claims made some of the
time.
Literature somewhat
supports the reflection.
The quality of the
literature is
inadequate which
has resulted in an
unsatisfactory
reflection and
explanation of the
concepts. There is
insufficient evidence
to support the claims
made.
10

6

Criterion 5
Formatting and
Referencing style is
accurate and consistent
with APA 7 style.
Consistently demonstrates exceptional proficiency in
referencing information appropriately, with all in-text
citations and reference list entries following APA 7
th
style with high accuracy and consistency.
APA 7th referencing style is mostly accurate and follows
APA guidelines with few errors or inconsistencies in
formatting.
APA 7th style not
used to support
discussion in text or
reference list.
Multiple errors or
inconsistencies in
formatting.
Points/Percentage 5
Criterion 6
Writing is in accordance
with standard language
conventions.
Consistently demonstrates exceptional proficiency in
written language conventions, including grammar,
punctuation, and spelling, with very few errors.
Writing is highly cohesive and logically organised.
Demonstrates basic proficiency in written language
conventions, with some errors in grammar,
punctuation, or spelling that may occasionally impede
understanding. Writing may lack coherence and
organisation at times.
Frequent errors in
grammar,
punctuation, and
spelling impede the
clarity and coherence
of the writing.
Writing is poorly
organised, difficult to
follow and is
confusing.
Points 5
Total Points 100

 

Tags: , , , , , , ,