Prepared by: Dr Sanjeeb Shrestha Moderated by: Dr Muhammad Ijaz July 2023
T2 2023 Formative Assessment 1 Details and Submission Guidelines | |
Unit Code | MN503 |
Unit Title | Overview of Internetworking |
Assessment Type | Individual |
Assessment Title | Network requirement analysis and plan |
Purpose of the assessment (with ULO Mapping) |
This assignment is designed to assess students’ knowledge and skills related to the following learning outcomes: a. Analyse and discuss the significance of internetworking for contemporary organisations |
Weight | 10 % Formative Assignment 1 |
Total Marks | 20 |
Word limit | N/A |
Due Date | Formative Assignment 1 (due date 06 August 2023) 11:59 PM – submit a report on Moodle. 7 A |
Submission Guidelines |
All work must be submitted on Moodle by the due date along with a Title Page. The assignment must be in MS Word format, 1.5 spacing, 11-pt Calibri (Body) font and 2.54 cm margins on all four sides of your page with appropriate section headings. Reference sources must be cited in the text of the report, and listed appropriately at the end in a reference list using IEEE referencing style. |
Extension | • If an extension of time to submit work is required, a Special Consideration Application must be submitted directly on AMS. You must submit this application three working days before the due date of the assignment. Further information is available at: http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies-procedures and-guidelines/specialhttp://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute publications/policies-procedures-and-guidelines/special considerationdefermentconsiderationdeferment |
Academic Misconduct |
• Academic Misconduct is a serious offence. Depending on the seriousness of the case, penalties can vary from a written warning or zero marks to exclusion from the course or rescinding the degree. Students should make themselves familiar with the full policy and procedure available at http://www.mit.edu.au/about mit/institute-publications/policies-procedures-and-guidelines/Plagiarism Academic-Misconduct-Policy-Procedure. For further information, please refer to the Academic Integrity Section in your Unit Description. |
MN503 Overview of Internetworking P a g e | 2
Prepared by: Dr Sanjeeb Shrestha Moderated by: Dr Muhammad Ijaz July 2023
Formative Assignment 1: Overview of Internetworking MN503
A case study entitled “MANDARIN ORIENTAL” is uploaded with the assignment 1 folder, and the
link for the case study is provided as an appendix.
Based on your understanding of the case study address the requirement of the Formative
Assignment 1 as below. Assume that we need to propose a wired and wireless network design for
MANDARIN ORIENTAL.
Formative Assignment 1
• Project scope
• Challenges
While designing the wired and the wireless network, please consider MANDARIN ORIENTAL
includes, a big outdoor pool, hotel with multiple stories and rooms (assume at least 10 floors and
30 rooms in each floor).
Marking criteria:
Example of marking criteria is shown in the following table. Marks are allocated as follows:
Section needs to be included in the report |
Description of the section | Marks |
Formative Assignment 1 | ||
Project Scope | Outline of the report (in 5 – 8 sentences) | 5 |
Challenges | Identify at least 5 challenges of the case study that needs to be addressed |
10 |
Reference style | Follow IEEE style referencing | 5 |
Total | 20 |
MN503 Overview of Internetworking P a g e | 3
Prepared by: Dr Sanjeeb Shrestha Moderated by: Dr Muhammad Ijaz July 2023
Example Marking Rubric for Assignment #: Total Marks 20
Grades | Excellent | Very Good | Good | Satisfactory | Unsatisfactory |
Formative Assignment 1 | |||||
Project Scope | Concise and specific to the project |
Topics are relevant and soundly analysed |
Generally relevant and analysed |
Some relevance and briefly presented |
This is not relevant to the assignment topic |
Challenges | Concise and specific to the project |
Topics are relevant and soundly analysed |
Generally relevant and analysed |
Some relevance and briefly presented |
This is not relevant to the assignment topic |
IEEE reference style |
Clear style with excellent references |
Clear referencing style |
Generally good referencing style |
Sometimes clear referencing style |
Lacks consistency with many error |
Appendix:
Case Study source: https://www.commscope.com/globalassets/digizuite/440-270-cs-mandarinhotel.pdf