TCHR2002 Children, Families & communities
ASSESSMENT 1: PortfolioSample Page
Summary
Title | Assessment 1: Portfolio of short responses |
Due Date | Monday 24th July (WEEK 4) @ 11:59pm (AEDT) |
Length | 1500 words including references |
Weighting | 50% |
Submission | 1 word document submitted to Turnitin |
Unit Learning Outcomes (ULO) | You will demonstrate the following Unit Learning Outcomes (ULO) on the successful completion of this task:
ULO 1: compare and critique historical and contemporary constructions of childhood and families, including those pertaining to Indigenous childhoods. ULO 2: identify the ways to ensure children feel that they are belonging, being, and becoming. ULO 3: explain the diverse range of issues affecting children, families and communities including social, economic and educational policies and their impact upon service provision for children and families. ULO4: Critically analyse texts, images, and songs in terms of the construction of childhood, and families across diverse contexts. |
Task Description
This task requires students to reflect upon key issues presented in Modules 1-3 and complete three (3) x 500 word responses to the questions below under Task Instructions.
Rationale
Working with and supporting children and families within the context of their community can present challenges. Early childhood professionals should reflect on the diversity of issues that face children and families. The aim of this assessment task is for students to demonstrate their knowledge and understanding regarding contemporary and diverse issues facing children, families and communities.
Task Instructions
You are required to answer each of the following three questions in approximately 500 words. All responses must be literature supported.
Question 1
Part A: In your own words, write a short definition (2-3 sentences) for proximal processes.
Part B: Think about the aspects that influence children’s lives today and how this has changed over the last twenty years. With reference to the unit content discuss how contemporary life may enhance or hinder proximal processes and outcomes compared to how life influenced them in the past. Frame your answer using the levels in Bronfenbrenner’s Ecological Model.
Question 2
The extent to which victims of bullying suffer negative outcomes is partly determined by how they cope with being bullied. In your future practice as an early childhood teacher, how can you ensure the children in your care have the skills and strategies to overcome bullying incidents with reference to the unit content. Make links to the Early Years Learning Framework (DET, 2022) where relevant.
Question 3
You are working at a long day care centre where a new family has enrolled. You have planned a cooking experience with the children when the boy (aged 4) states, “cooking is the girl’s job, boys should not cook!” Discuss the following points with reference to the unit content:
What language and actions would you use to handle this situation?
How can you teach gender equality as part of the Australian culture with children aged 3-5 years?
What are the strategies you could implement to work towards social justice and equity?
Follow the steps to complete the task:
Create a new Word Document and save it with your surname and initials and the assessment task’s name. E.g: MillsA_assessment1_portfolio
Create a cover page with the following details:
Student name
Student ID
Unit code
Unit Assessor and Tutor names
Date submitted
Complete three (3) x 500 word responses to the prompts listed above. Responses must be literature supported.
Complete one reference list for the entire assessment task.
Once complete, submit task via the Turnitin link in the Assessment and Submission section of the unit site.
Adhere to APA7 formatting guidelines
Referencing Style
APA 7th referencing format is required in Faculty of Education assessment tasks – link to SCU Libguide here: APA 7 Referencing.
Task Submission
Assessments should be submitted using the Turnitin activity titled “Assessment 1: Portfolio” in the Assessments Tasks & Submission section on the Blackboard TCHR2002 site. Only Microsoft Word documents submitted via the Turnitin portal on Blackboard will be accepted. You must label your submission with your surname and initials and the assessment task’s name, e.g: ByrneT_assessment1_portfolio
Special Consideration
Students wishing to request special consideration to extend the due date of an assessment task must submit a Request for Special Consideration form via their MyEnrolment page as early as possible and prior to the original due date for that assessment task, along with any accompanying documents, such as medical certificates.
Late Submissions & Penalties
Except when special consideration is awarded, late submission of assessment tasks will lead automatically to the imposition of a penalty. Penalties will be incurred as soon as the deadline is reached.
a penalty of 5% of the available marks will be deducted from the actual mark at one minute after the time listed in the due date.
a further penalty of 5% of the available mark will be deducted from the actual mark achieved on each subsequent calendar day until the mark reaches zero.”
Grades & Feedback
Assignments that have been submitted by the due date will receive an SCU grade and written feedback. Grades and feedback will be posted to “Grades & Feedback” section on the Blackboard unit site. Please allow 7 working days for marks to be posted.
Academic Integrity
At Southern Cross University academic integrity means behaving with the values of honesty, fairness, trustworthiness, courage, responsibility and respect in relation to academic work. The Southern Cross University Academic Integrity Framework aims to develop a holistic, systematic and consistent approach to addressing academic integrity across the entire University. For more information see the SCU Academic Integrity Framework
Generative Artificial Intelligence tools:
I am reminding you that Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) tools are NOT permitted for use in this assessment (see Assessment Information Booklet, Section 8.0). Using any such tools constitutes academic misconduct, as you are not the author/creator of the assessment you are submitting. Futurepedia is a good starting point for checking to make sure the tool/app that you want to use is not GenAI driven; however, remember that new artificial intelligence tools are coming online daily, so take a screenshot.
As a student in the contemporary world, I am going to suggest to you that you should take steps to safeguard yourself from academic misconduct by making sure that you keep records of your processes when completing your assessment – e.g., screenshots (with date and time evident), log of search history, different versions of files etc. You don’t have to do this; it’s just a suggestion. Another suggestion is to use a free GenAI checker (see if you agree with their T&Cs first) to make sure it flags your submission as ‘written by a human’.
Assessment Rubric
Marking Criteria and & allocation |
High Distinction (85-100%) |
Distinction (75-84%) |
Credit (65-74%) |
Pass (50-64%) |
Fail (0-49%) |
Criteria 1 Definition of proximal process /5 marks |
Provides a well-articulated and concise definition of proximal processes accurately that reflects the concept. |
Provides a solid definition of proximal processes accurately that reflects the concept. |
Provides an appropriate definition of proximal processes that reflects the concept. |
Provides a satisfactory definition of proximal processes that reflects the concept; however, it may lack clarity and some minor inaccuracies. |
Provides an inaccurate or irrelevant definition of proximal processes. |
Criteria 2 Explanation of contemporary and historical influences on proximal processes and outcomes with reference to the unit content /10marks |
Provides a comprehensive discussion of the ways in which contemporary life may enhance or hinder proximal processes and outcomes compared to the past, using Bronfenbrenner’s Ecological Model to frame the answer. |
Provides a clear and concise discussion of the ways in which contemporary life may enhance or hinder proximal processes and outcomes compared to the past, using Bronfenbrenner’s Ecological Model to frame the answer. |
Provides an appropriate discussion of the ways in which contemporary life may enhance or hinder proximal processes and outcomes compared to the past, using Bronfenbrenner’s Ecological Model to frame the answer. |
Provides a satisfactory discussion of the ways in which contemporary life may enhance or hinder proximal processes and outcomes compared to the past, using Bronfenbrenner’s Ecological Model to frame the answer. |
Provides an inadequate or irrelevant discussion of the ways in which contemporary life may enhance or hinder proximal processes and outcomes compared to the past, using Bronfenbrenner’s Ecological Model to frame the answer. |
Criteria 3 Strategies for supporting children’s coping skills in response to bullying with reference to the unit content. /15 |
Provides a comprehensive discussion of strategies for supporting children’s coping skills in response to bullying, with clear links to the Early Years Learning Framework where relevant. |
Provides a clear and concise discussion of strategies for supporting children’s coping skills in response to bullying, with links to the Early Years Learning Framework where relevant. |
Provides an appropriate discussion of strategies for supporting children’s coping skills in response to bullying, with some links to the Early Years Learning Framework where relevant. |
Provides a satisfactory discussion of strategies for supporting children’s coping skills in response to bullying, with few or no links to the Early Years Learning Framework where relevant. |
Provides an inadequate or irrelevant discussion of strategies for supporting children’s coping skills in response to bullying, with no links to the Early Years Learning Framework where relevant. |
Criteria 4 Promoting gender equality and social justice in the early childhood setting with reference to the unit content /15 |
Provides a comprehensive discussion of language and actions that could be used to address the situation, strategies for teaching gender equality to young children, and strategies for working towards social justice and equity in the early childhood setting. |
Provides a clear and concise discussion of language and actions that could be used to address the situation, strategies for teaching gender equality to young children, and strategies for working towards social justice and equity in the early childhood setting. |
Provides an appropriate discussion of language and actions that could be used to handle the situation, strategies for teaching gender equality to young children, and strategies for working towards social justice and equity in the early childhood setting, with minor limitations or errors. |
Provides a satisfactory discussion of language and actions that could be used to handle the situation, strategies for teaching gender equality to young children, and strategies for working towards social justice and equity in the early childhood setting, with some limitations or errors. |
Provides an inadequate or irrelevant discussion of language and actions that could be used to handle the situation, strategies for teaching gender equality to young children, and strategies for working towards social justice and equity in the early childhood setting. |
Criteria 5 Academic Literacy including correct word count, correct writing conventions, use of professional language and academic referencing (APA 7th style) and a minimum of 10 academic references. /5 |
Demonstrates a comprehensive understanding of correct writing conventions, including accurate spelling, grammar, and punctuation. The reference list contains all the required information in the correct APA 7 format. |
Demonstrates a thorough understanding of correct writing conventions by correctly using spelling, grammar, and punctuation throughout with very minor inaccuracies. The reference list contains all the required information in the correct APA 7 format, with very minor errors. |
Demonstrates a good understanding of correct writing conventions by correctly using spelling, grammar, and punctuation, with minor inaccuracies. The reference list contains all the required information, but some items may be in an incorrect format or have more than five minor errors. |
Demonstrates a satisfactory understanding of correct writing conventions by mostly using correct spelling, grammar, and punctuation, with some inaccuracies. The reference list provides most of the required information, but there are some errors. |
Poor understanding of correct writing conventions, including accurate spelling, grammar, and punctuation. The reference list is incorrectly formatted or there are an inadequate number of references. |
Description of SCU Grades
High Distinction:
The student’s performance, in addition to satisfying all of the basic learning requirements, demonstrates distinctive insight and ability in researching, analysing and applying relevant skills and concepts, and shows exceptional ability to synthesise, integrate and evaluate knowledge. The student’s performance could be described as outstanding in relation to the learning requirements specified.
Distinction:
The student’s performance, in addition to satisfying all of the basic learning requirements, demonstrates distinctive insight and ability in researching, analysing and applying relevant skills and concepts, and shows a well-developed ability to synthesise, integrate and evaluate knowledge. The student’s performance could be described as distinguished in relation to the learning requirements specified.
Credit:
The student’s performance, in addition to satisfying all of the basic learning requirements specified, demonstrates insight and ability in researching, analysing and applying relevant skills and concepts. The student’s performance could be described as competent in relation to the learning requirements specified.
Pass:
The student’s performance satisfies all of the basic learning requirements specified and provides a sound basis for proceeding to higher-level studies in the subject area. The student’s performance could be described as satisfactory in relation to the learning requirements specified.
Fail:
The student’s performance fails to satisfy the learning requirements specified.
Tags: alwaysopen, assignmenthelpaustralia, assignmenthelpmelbourne, assignmenthelpsydney, assignmenthelpwebsites, london, londonstudent, melbourne, myassignmenthelp, plagiarismfreework, studentassignmenthelp