Assessment 2 Information
Subject Code: | GB580 |
Subject Name: | Strategic Management |
Assessment Title: Weighting: Total Marks: |
Case Study 40% 40 |
Due Date: | Week 9 Monday 16th January at 11.59pm |
Assessment Description
Individual Assignment – Case Study
(40 marks | Word limit: 2,000 words)
You are a strategic analyst for a large consulting firm and specialise in the analysis of Australian companies. You
have been asked by your manager to write a report analysing an Australian company’s underlying strategy that
has resulted in it moving some of its activities offshore with the loss of a number of local jobs.
Note: You are able to choose any Australian company.
In your analysis you are required to:
• Evaluate the external issues (using external analysis tools/models you have been taught) that are
affecting the company and have driven it to employ a strategy that has resulted in moving jobs offshore.
• Analyse the internal issues (using internal analysis tools/models you have been taught) that are making the
company consider moving jobs offshore as part of itsstrategy.
• Identify the stakeholders in this company and discuss how the shift of offshore activities will affect these
stakeholders.
• Explain why a number of jobs will continue to be based in Australia and the associated implications
You are expected to use a minimum of 15 references. As a guide these must be authoritative and comprise:
|
At least 10 academic articles/papers Up to 2 text books (including the prescribed text). Up to 3 other authoritative sources of your choice. |
Please note the wordcount of 2,000. Any wordcount longer that this will not be marked.
Please note.
Wikipedia, Slideshare, Businessballs, BizEd, Mindtools and other non-academic sources are
not considered to be authoritative and will bring low marks if used. General website information should also be
avoided. Use journal articles instead. If in doubt, please consult your lecturer.
COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA Copyright Regulations 1969
This material has been reproduced and communicated to you by or on behalf of Kaplan Business School pursuant to Part VB of the Copyright Act 1968 (‘Act’). The material
in this communication may be subject to copyright under the Act. Any further reproduction or communication of this material by you may be the subject of copyright protection
under the Act. Kaplan Business School is a part of Kaplan Inc., a leading global provider of educational services. Kaplan Business School Pty Ltd ABN 86 098 181 947 is a
registered higher education provider CRICOS Provider Code 02426B.
Assessment Information
COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIACopyright Regulations 1969
This material has been reproduced and communicated to you by or on behalf of Kaplan Business School pursuant to Part VB of the Copyright Act 1968 (‘Act’). The material in this communication may be subject to copyright under the Act. Any further
reproduction or communication of this material by you may be the subject of copyright protection under the Act. Kaplan Business School is a part of Kaplan Inc., a leading global provider of educational services. Kaplan Business School Pty Ltd ABN 86
098 181 947 is a registered higher education provider CRICOS Provider Code02426B.
Assessment Marking Rubric
Criteria | HD (High Distinction) 85%-100% |
DN (Distinction) 75%-84% |
CR (Credit) 74%-65% |
P (Pass) 50%-64% |
NN (Fail) 0%-49% |
Score |
Evaluate the external issues that are affecting the company and have driven it to employ a strategy that has resulted in moving jobs offshore. |
Full and skilful evaluation of the external issues that are affecting the Australian company and driving it to employ this strategy and activity. |
Full and logical evaluation of the external issues that are affecting the Australian company and driving it to employ this strategy and activity. |
Logical but limited evaluation of the external issues that are affecting the Australian company and driving it to employ this strategy and activity. |
Limited evaluation of the external issues that are affecting the Australian company and driving it to employ this strategy and activity. |
Poor or no evaluation of the external issues that are affecting the Australian company and driving it to employ this strategy and activity. |
/10 |
Analyse the internal issues that are making the company consider moving jobs offshore as part of its strategy. |
Full and skilful analysis of the strategic advantages and disadvantages of moving jobs offshore. |
Clear and logical analysis of the strategic advantages and disadvantages of moving jobs offshore. |
Logical but limited analysis of the strategic advantages and disadvantages of moving jobs offshore. |
Limited analysis of the strategic advantages and disadvantages of moving jobs offshore. |
Poor or no analysis of the strategic advantages and disadvantages of moving jobs offshore. |
/10 |
Identify the stakeholders in this company and discuss how the shift of offshore activities will affect these stakeholders. |
Excellent and logically developed discussion on how this activity will affect the various stakeholders of the organisation. |
Clear reasoned discussion on how this activity will affect the various stakeholders of the organisation. |
Logical but limited discussion on how this activity will affect the various stakeholders of the organisation. |
Limited discussion on how this activity will affect the various stakeholders of the organisation. |
Poor or no discussion on how this activity will affect the various stakeholders of the organisation. |
/6 |
Explain why a number of jobs will continue to be based in Australia and the implications |
Full and skilful analysis of why the Australian company is keeping a number of jobs onshore and thorough discussion of the implications. |
Clear and logical analysis of why the Australian company is keeping a number of jobs onshore and clear discussion of the implications. |
Logical but limited analysis of why the Australian company is keeping a number of jobs onshore and partial identification of implications. |
Limited analysis of why the Australian company is keeping a number of jobs onshore and implications. |
Poor or no analysis of why the Australian company is keeping a number of jobs onshore or implications. |
/6 |
Use of research and quality of analysis and referencing |
Excellent and skilful integration of substantial research to support analysis within the word limit. Perfect Referencing. |
Very good evidence of wider research to support analysis within the word limit. Near perfect referencing. |
Good evidence of wider research to support analysis within the word limit. Sound referencing. |
Limited evidence of wider research to support analysis within the word limit. Acceptable referencing. |
Little or no evidence of wider research to support analysis within the word limit. Poor referencing. |
/8 |
Comments: Assignment Mark/Grade: |
Total score /40 |
Tags: Assignment Help for Students, Assignment Help Free, Assignment Help Online Free, Assignment Help Websites, assignmenthelp, AssignmentHelpOnline, BestAssignmentHelp, myassignmenthelp, OnlineAssignmentHelp, Student Assignment Help, University Assignment Help