HOLMES INSTITUTE FACULTY OF HIGHER EDUCATION |
HI5017 MANAGERIAL ACCOUNTING INDIVIDUAL REFLECTIVE JOURNAL T3 2019
Assessment Details and Submission Guidelines | |
Trimester | T3 2019 |
Unit Code | HI5017 |
Unit Title | Managerial Accounting |
Assessment Type | Assignment |
Assessment Title | Individual Reflective Journal |
Purpose of the assessment (with ULO Mapping) |
The purpose of this assessment is to ensure each student is able to document a critical reflection of their personal learning process, as experienced during this unit (ULO 1, 5, 6, 7, 8). |
Weight | 10% of the total assessments |
Total Marks | 10 |
Word limit | 1,000 words. Please use “word count” and include in assignment. |
Due Date | Week 11 Friday at 11.59 p.m. |
Submission Guidelines |
Students should complete the reflective journal individually. All work must be submitted on Blackboard by the due date along with a completed Assignment Cover Page. The assignment must be in MS Word format, no spacing, 12-pt Arial font and 2 cm margins on all four sides of your page with appropriate section headings and page numbers. Reference sources must be cited in the text of the report, and listed appropriately at the end in a reference list using Harvard referencing style. It is the responsibility of the student who is submitting the work, to ensure that the work is in fact her/his own work. Incorporating another’s work or ideas into one’s own work without appropriate acknowledgement is an academic offence. Students should submit all assignments for plagiarism checking on Blackboard before final submission in the subject. For further details, please refer to the Unit Outline and Student Handbook. |
Page 2 of 3
HI5017 MANAGERIAL ACCOUNTING INDIVIDUAL REFLECTIVE JOURNAL T3 2019
Individual Reflective Journal SpecificationsEvidence for communication with assessors
Purpose:
The Individual Reflective Journal is to ensure each student is able to contribute to document a critical
reflection of their personal learning process, as experienced during this unit. A significant aspect of
the reflective journal will be your reflections on what you learnt and experienced from your individual
assignment.
Assignment Task:
1. Reflections on the selected two peer reviewed journal articles based on the assignment topics.
What went well, what did not go to plan, how did you addressed any difficulties, and what had you
learnt from it.
2. Reflections on the research experience. What was enjoyable, what was difficult, what insights had
you gained, and any issues, challenges you experienced.
3. Reflections on what you had learned from the individual assignment, including the relevance of
the two costing techniques to businesses today. What insights had you gained and what had you
learnt from it.
Marking criteria:
Marking criteria | Weighting |
1. Reflections on the selected two peer reviewed journal articles based on the assignment topics. |
3% |
2. Reflections on the research experience | 3% |
3. Reflections on what were learned from the individual assignment | 4% |
TOTAL Weight | 10% |
Page 3 of 3
HI5017 MANAGERIAL ACCOUNTING INDIVIDUAL REFLECTIVE JOURNAL T3 2019
Marking Rubric
Excellent | Very Good | Good | Satisfactory | Unsatisfactory | |
1. Reflections on the selected two peer reviewed journal articles based on the assignment topics. (3 marks) |
Excellent reflections on the selected two peer reviewed journal articles based on the assignment topics. |
Very good reflections on the selected two peer reviewed journal articles based on the assignment topics. |
Good reflections on the selected two peer reviewed journal articles based on the assignment topics. |
Reasonable reflections on the selected two peer reviewed journal articles based on the assignment topics. |
Unable to present a proper reflection on the selected two peer reviewed journal articles based on the assignment topics. |
2. Reflections on the research experience (3 marks) |
Excellent reflections on the research experience. |
Very good reflections on the research experience. |
Good reflections on the research experience. |
Reasonable reflections on the research experience. |
Unable to present a proper reflection on the research experience. |
3. Reflections on what were learned from the individual assignment (4 marks) |
Excellent reflections on the insights gained from the individual assignment. |
Very good reflections on the insights gained from the individual assignment |
Good reflections on the insights gained from the individual assignment |
Reasonable reflections on the insights gained from the individual assignment |
Unable to present a proper reflection on the insights gained from the individual assignment |
Total Marks (10) | /10 |