HLSC220: Healthcare Ethics

128 views 10:55 am 0 Comments September 10, 2023

 

ASSESSMENT INFORMATION

Assessment Title

Purpose
Due Date
Time Due Weighting
Length Assessment Rubric LOs Assessed

Written Essay

The purpose of this assessment is for students to demonstrate the capacity to develop a written ethical argument analysing the application of bioethics in healthcare.

Refer to HLSC220 EUO
Refer to HLSC220 EUO
45%
1500 words +/- 10% (includes intext citations, excludes reference list) Refer to Extended Unit Outline Appendix 3

LO1, LO2, LO3

Task

Three topics will be available for you on LEO. You will select one of these topics and construct a written essay. You are encouraged to choose a topic that you feel is important to you and that you feel passionate about.

In relation to your selected topic:

  • Consider the application of the bioethical principles that have beendiscussed in the unit.
  • Consider the application of ethical theories and other ethical concepts tothe chosen topic.
  • Based on the evidence, construct a written discussion that clearly presentsthese ethical considerations and the ethical dilemma/s. You need to

    discuss both sides of the argument/s.

  • Based on the evidence determine and then specify your ethical stance.
  • Present your work in a formal academic essay using APA referencing thatincludes an introduction, discussion, and conclusion

Target Audience Submission FORMATTING File format Margins

Font and size Spacing

Healthcare professionals
Via the Turnitin link in the HLSC220 LEO site

Please submit as a .doc or .docx (not .pdf files) 2.54cm, all sides
Use 11-point Calibri, Arial or Times New Roman

Double spacing
HLSC220 _ Assessment 3: Written Essay _ © Australian Catholic University 2022 _ Page 1 of 3

HLSC220: Healthcare Ethics

Paragraph Title Page

Level 1 Heading Level 2 Headings

Aligned to left margin, indent first line of each paragraph 1.27cm Not to be used

Centered, bold, capitalize each word (14-point Calibri, Arial or Times New Roman)

Left justified, bold, sentence case, italicized (12-point Calibri, Arial or Times New Roman)

Always require a page number. No more than 10% of the word count should be direct quotes.

Page number top right corner (9-point Calibri or Arial)
Name _ Student Number_ Assessment _ Unit _ Year (9-point Calibri or Arial)

APA 7th Edition.

Most references for this task should be published within the last 5 years, however the appropriate use of older evidence sources (e.g. seminal theoretical ethical work) is acceptable.

“References” is centered, bold, on a new page (14 point Calibri or Arial). References are arranged alphabetically by author family name
Second and subsequent lines of a reference have a hanging indent Presented as functional hyperlink

Double spacing the entire reference list, both within and between entries

Structure

Introduction: Provides an introduction and brief background to the topic and ethical discussion, identifies the ethical stance to be argued.
Body: Provides the content of the ethical arguments incorporating diverse perspectives on the bioethical principles, ethical theories, other ethical concepts. Conclusion: identifies the key ethical points argued and re-iterates the ethical stance taken. Does not introduce new ideas.

Reference List: Includes all the sources identified within the essay. Use APA 7th edition.

Direct quotes Header

Footer

REFERENCING

Referencing Style

Age of References List Heading Alphabetical Order Hanging Indent DOI or URL Spacing ADMINISTRATION

Minimum References

There is no set number of references that must be used as a minimum for this task, but as a rough guide only, if you have utilized less than 10-12 unique quality peer-reviewed sources then you have not read widely enough.
All arguments must be supported using a variety of high-quality primary evidence. Avoid using any one source repetitively.

Late Penalties

Late penalties will be applied from 02:01pm on the 24th May 2023, incurring 5% penalty of the maximum marks available up to a maximum of 15% in total. Assessment tasks that are submitted more than three calendar days after the due date or extended due date will not be allocated a mark.

HLSC220 _ Assessment 3: Written Essay _ © Australian Catholic University 2022 _ Page 2 of 3

HLSC220: Healthcare Ethics

Example:

An assignment is submitted 12 hours late and is initially marked at 60 out of 100. A 5% penalty is applied (5% of 100 is 5 marks). Therefore, the student receives 55 out of 100 as a final mark.

Penalty Timeframe
2:00 pm Wednesday to 1:59pm Thursday 2:00pm Thursday to1:59pm Friday
2:00 pm Friday to 2:00pm Saturday Received after 2:00pm Saturday

Penalty
5% penalty
10% penalty
15% penalty
No mark allocated

Marks Deducted 5 marks
10 marks
15 marks

n/a

Marks will generally be returned after three weeks of the submission due date; if Return of Marks this is not achievable you will be notified via the LEO forum.

Marks for the final assessment (assessment three) of this unit will be withheld Final Assignment until after grade ratification and grade release for semester 1.

Assessment template project informed by ACU student forums, ACU Librarians and the Academic Skills Unit.

HLSC220 _ Assessment 3: Written Essay _ © Australian Catholic University 2022 _ Page 3 of 3

Tags: , , , , , ,

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *