3pm
30/12/22 14:41
Understanding: Superficial understanding of some key issues, lack of focus.
Depth of Knowledge: No depth to knowledge. Key issues misunderstood or not addressed’ Limited or no use of relevant sources to support work.
Critical Analysis: Limited evidence of a critical approach to key issues and ability to evaluate arguments. Structure: Competent work in places but lacks fluency/coherence. General Feedback:
Part A: For your reflective account you applied Tuckman’s model, though you need to revisit the framework as its use is limited in this case.
Your analysis of the group was positive until the end, and the suggestion that other group members lacked interest in the case conference needs some scrutiny, particularly in light of its importance as a component of the assessment.
Part B: From the outset your discussion was supported by largely extinct sources, in temrs of their relation to practice in 2022. A
Save As Artefact
OK
U 0