The tension between compliance and innovation

173 views 7:22 am 0 Comments April 27, 2023

Page 1 Kaplan Business School Assessment Outline
Document classification: Internal
Assessment 1 Information

Subject Code: DATA4300
Subject Name: Data Security and Ethics
Assessment Title: The tension between compliance and innovation
Assessment Type: Interactive Case Study and Video
Word Count: 700 Words (+/-10%) (Case Study)
5-minute interview (Video)
Weighting: 30%: 20% (Case Study), 10% (Video)
Total Marks: 30
Submission: via Turnitin, Kaltura and in-class
Due Date: Monday 10:00am (AEST) Week 6 (Case Study)
In-class
Week 6 (Video)

Assessment Description
You are being considered for a job as a compliance expert by an organization and charged with
writing recommendations to its Board of Directors’ Data Ethics Committee to decide on:
A. Adopting new technology solution that addresses a business need, and
B. The opportunities and risks of this technology in terms of privacy, cybersecurity and ethics
Based on this recommendation you will be considered for a job at the company.
Your Task
Choose a company as your personal case study. You must choose a company which starts
with the same letter as the first letter your first or last name.
Complete Part A and B below:
1.
Part A (Case Study): Students are to write a 700-word case study and submit it as
a Microsoft word file via Turnitin by
Monday, Week 6 at 10:00am (AEST) (Before
class
)
Note: Completing Step 1 before Step 2 is crucial. If you have not submitted Step 1 in time for your in-class Step 2, you must
notify your facilitator via email immediately to receive further instruction about your assessment status.
2. Part B (One-way interview): Students need to be present IN CLASS in Week 6
where the lecturer will take them through how to record a one-way interview based
on their case study.

Page 2 Kaplan Business School Assessment Outline
Document classification: Internal
Assessment Instructions
PART A: Case Study (20 marks)
You are being considered for a job as a compliance expert by an organisation and charged with
writing recommendations to its Board of Directors’ Data Ethics Committee to decide about:
a) Adopting a new technology solution that addresses a company need, and
b) The opportunities and risks of this technology in terms of privacy, cybersecurity, regulation
and ethics and how this affects the viability of the technology
Your answers to the above two questions will be presented in a case study which will be
considered in your job application. See suggested structure below:

Case Study
Section
Content
Introduction
(6 marks)
Introduction about the use of new technologies in the organization you are
applying for a job in (your pick of IoT, AI, blockchain, or secure web
payments etc.) and explaining how it can enhance company performance.
Example sources:
Arguing the Pros and Cons of Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare:
https://healthitanalytics.com/news/arguing-the-pros-and-cons-of
artificial-intelligence-in-healthcare
Rethinking risk and compliance for the Age of AI:
https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2020/09/rethinking-risk
management-and-compliance-age-of-ai-artificial-intelligence/
Privacy,
cybersecurity,
and data
ethics:
Opportunities
and risks (12
marks)
Outline opportunities and possible cybersecurity, privacy and ethical
risks associated with the use of the proposed technology.
Outline how these risks and opportunities affect the viability of this
technology
Sources
How emerging technologies can usher in the dawn of pervasive
intelligence:
https://www.ey.com/en_gl/consulting/how-emerging
technologies-can-usher-in-the-dawn-of-pervasive-intelligence
Trust In The Digital Age Requires Data Ethics And A Data
Literate Workforce:
https://www.forbes.com/sites/tableau/2022/04/14/trust-in-the
digital-age-requires-data- ethics-and-a-data-literate
workforce/?sh=637e29db5437
References
and structure
(2 Marks)
Include a minimum of five original references.
Use the Harvard referencing style.
Use appropriate headings and paragraphs.
Acknowledge sections written by AI technology.

Page 3 Kaplan Business School Assessment Outline
Document classification: Internal
PART B: Video Interview (10 marks)
Record a 5-minute video answering a question related to your case study.
1) At the beginning of Week 6 class your lecturer will take you through how to record a video
using Kaltura (
https://elearning.kbs.edu.au/mod/scorm/view.php?id=339347 )
2) You will enter a “Moodle quiz” on MyKBS where you will need to:
a. Type a brief answer to the process you went through in choosing your technology and
finding resources to assess the risks and opportunities
b. Record a 5-minute video answering an interview question from the company based on
your case study (there will be a test bank of questions so no one student gets same
questions)
3) You have the whole three hour class to do this but ONLY ONE attempt at the video
recording
4) The lecturer will be available for the whole 3 hour session if you run into difficulties
Page 4 Kaplan Business School Assessment Outline
Document classification: Internal
Important Study Information
Academic Integrity Policy
KBS values academic integrity. All students must understand the meaning and consequences
of cheating, plagiarism and other academic offences under the Academic Integrity and Conduct
Policy.
What is academic integrity and misconduct?
What are the penalties for academic misconduct?
What are the late penalties?
How can I appeal my grade?
Click here for answers to these questions:
http://www.kbs.edu.au/current-students/student-policies/.
Word Limits for Written Assessments
Submissions that exceed the word limit by more than 10% will cease to be marked from the point
at which that limit is exceeded.
Study Assistance
Students may seek study assistance from their local Academic Learning Advisor or refer to the
resources on the MyKBS Academic Success Centre page. Click
here for this information.
Document classification: Internal
Assessment Marking Guide

Section Criteria NN (Fail)
0%-49%
P (Pass) 50%-
64%
CR (Credit) 74%-
65%
DN (Distinction) 75%-
84%
HD (High
Distinction)
85%-100%
Part A: Case Study
Introduction
(6 marks)
Students must
precisely introduce the
idea of using new
technologies in the
organization (choice of
IoT, AI, blockchain,
secure web payments,
etc.) and explain how it
can enhance company
performance.
The student
failed to
include
several
parts of the
task, or the
content of
their case
study is
irrelevant.
The student has
produced a basic
introduction on
new technology
adoption for a
real company.
The introduction
about benefits of
using new
technologies
needs to be more
realistic and
precise.
The student has
produced a well
written introduction
on using new
technologies for a
real company.
The benefits of using
new technologies are
clear and realistic.
There is evidence of
some research.
The student has produced
a well-thought introduction
to using new technologies
for a real company.
The benefits of new
technologies are clear,
realistic, and related to the
case study.
There is evidence of well
thought-out research.
The student has produced a
well-thought and original
introduction to using new
technologies for a real
company.
The benefits of new technologies
are clear, realistic, and related to
the case study.
There is evidence of deep
research.
Part A: Case Study
Privacy, cybersecurity,
and data ethics:
Opportunities and
risks
(12 marks)
Students must outline
opportunities and
possible cybersecurity,
privacy, and ethical
risks associated with
the proposed
technology.
The student
failed to
include
several parts
of the task, or
the content of
their case
study is
irrelevant.
There is
unclear
evidence of
research.
The student
has produced
a basic case
study on
opportunities
and risks of
using the
proposed
technology for
a real
company.
The student
has a basic
grasp of
privacy,
cybersecurity,
and data
ethics.
There is
evidence of
some
research.
The student has
produced a well
written case study
on opportunities and
risks of using the
proposed
technology for a real
company.
The student
understands
privacy,
cybersecurity,
and data ethics
issues well.
The opportunities
and risks of using
new technologies
are clear and
realistic.
There is evidence
of good research.
The student has
produced an integrated
case study on
opportunities and risks
of using new
technologies for a real
company.
The student
understands privacy,
cybersecurity, and data
ethics issues well and
explains and supports
their arguments with
evidence from relevant
references and realistic
suggestions for its use.
The opportunities and
risks of using new
technologies are clear
and realistic.
There is evidence of
well-thought-out
research.
The student has produced a
well-integrated and original
case study on opportunities
and risks of using new
technologies for a real
company.
The student demonstrated
acquired knowledge of privacy,
cybersecurity, and data ethics
issues and presented the most
important opportunities and risks
uniquely and practically.
The opportunities and risks of
using new technologies are
clear, realistic, and related to the
proposed technology.
There is evidence of deep
research into the topic.

Document classification: Internal

Part A: Case Study
References and
structure
(2 marks)
Students must use
the Harvard
referencing style.
Students must include
a minimum of five
original references.
The introduction must
have appropriate
headings,
paragraphs, and
logical structure.
Students must
acknowledge sections
written by AI
technology.
Referencing is
incorrect,
irrelevant, or
there are no
references.
The
introduction
does not have
appropriate
headings,
paragraphs,
and logical
structure.
There are
sections
written by AI
technology
with no
acknowledgme
nt.
Harvard
referencing is
basic and has a
few errors.
The introduction
has appropriate
headings,
paragraphs, and
logical structure,
but with a few
errors.
Sections that are
written by AI
technology have
acknowledgment
but without
editing.
Harvard
referencing has
no errors.
The introduction
has appropriate
headings,
paragraphs, and
logical structure
with no errors.
Sections that are
written by AI
technology have
acknowledgment
and some
editing.
Harvard referencing
has no errors.
The introduction has
appropriate headings
and paragraphs, and
the structure is logical,
with some novelty.
Sections that are written
by AI technology have
acknowledgment and
good editing.
Some novelty.
Harvard referencing has no
errors.
The introduction has
appropriate headings and
paragraphs, and the
structure is logical and
flows well, with remarkable
originality.
Sections written by AI
technology have
acknowledgment and
acceptable editing and
include original
improvements and citations.
PART B: Video
Interview
Students must reflect
to answer a brief
question reflecting on
their case study
writing process.
(2 marks)
Students must
respond to a novel
question from the
hiring company about
their case study over
video as part of the
interview process.
(8 marks)
The student
has shown no
evidence of an
understanding
of their writing
process.
The student
demonstrated
no ability to
integrate
information.
The student has
partially reflected
on the process of
writing their case
study.
The student
demonstrated
some ability to
integrate
information.
The student has
generally
reflected on the
process of writing
their case study.
The student has
addressed the
majority of the
question. They
have used their
knowledge to
adapt to a novel
question.
The student has
reflected on most of the
below: the process of
writing their case study,
conducting research and
answering questions.
The student has
integrated what they
learned to answer the
question well. The
student has
synthesized their
learning to adapt it to a
novel question about
the topic
The student has
comprehensively reflected on
the process of writing their
case study, conducting
research and answering
questions.
The student has integrated
what they learned to answer
the unique interview question
effectively under time
pressure. The student has
considered their audience
and synthesized their
learning to adapt it to a novel
question about the topic.

Document classification: Internal
Important Study Information
Academic Integrity Policy
KBS values academic integrity. All students must understand the meaning and consequences of cheating,
plagiarism and other academic offences under the Academic Integrity and Conduct Policy.
What is academic integrity and misconduct?
What are the penalties for academic misconduct?
What are the late penalties?
How can I appeal my grade?
The answers to these questions can be accessed at
https://www.kbs.edu.au/about-us/school-policies.
Length Limits for Assessments
Penalties may be applied for assessment submissions that exceed prescribed limits.
Study Assistance
Students may seek study assistance from their local Academic Learning Advisor or refer to the
resources on the
MyKBS Academic Success Centre page. Further details can be accessed at
https://elearning.kbs.edu.au/course/view.php?id=1481