Taxation Law

132 views 8:35 am 0 Comments April 25, 2023

LAW6001 Assessment Brief 3 Case Study T2 2019 Page 1 of 9

ASSESSMENT BRIEF
Subject Code and Title LAW 6001 Taxation Law
Assessment Assessment : Case Study
Individual/Group Individual
Length 2500-3000 words
Learning Outcomes This case study must be presented as an individual effort. The
case study requires individual research. The course manual
and set texts are intended to be the starting point of the
research. It is expected the student will survey the relevant
literature, including decided cases, and select appropriate
additional resources.
The case study is designed to incorporate uncertainty. The
student is expected to develop a piece of work which is
written advice for their client. It must therefore identify the
facts and issues presented by each aspect of the case study,
identify and apply the relevant legislation and/or case law,
come to a conclusion and make a recommendation to the
client.
Specific learning outcomes
a) Interpret and apply selected sections of the Income Tax
Assessment Act ITAA36 and ITAA 97.
b) Identify and analyse the tax treatment of various types of
income and deductions.
c) Explain and apply the basic features of the capital gains tax
provisions and calculate net capital gains/losses
d) Effectively apply taxation law in determining tax outcomes
in various scenarios and structures.
Submission By 11:55pm AEST/AEDT Sunday of Week 10
Weighting 20%
Total Marks 55 marks

Context:
This assessment assesses your research skills, your ability to synthesise an original piece of
work to specific content requirements and your ability to produce a comprehensible piece of
advice which addressing the client’s needs.

LAW6001 Assessment Brief 3 Case Study T2 2019 Page 2 of 9
It also assesses your written communication skills. The ability to deliver to a brief is an
essential skill in the workplace. Clients may well approach advisors seeking a combination of
specific information needs and advice on the tax implications of a particular arrangement in
the Australian tax jurisdiction. It is therefore important to be able to identify all the issues
presented by an arrangement and to think about the potential consequences of different
approaches to addressing the client’s needs.
Instructions:
Your case study needs to identify and discuss the tax implications of the various issues
raised. In order to produce your case study, you will need to review relevant case and
legislation. The subject manual and set texts are starting points only; you will be expected to
use these initial materials to identify potential useful resources. You will then need to review
your selected resources to see if they value add to your analysis.
Your case study is not just a list of answers. Your reasons for your conclusions and
recommendations must be based on your research into the relevant cases and legislation.
Question 1 (10 marks)
Adam Collins was born in Australia and works as an international airline pilot. He is married
to Narelle and they have two school aged children. Adam and Narelle own a house in
Sydney and receive interest on savings from their joint Australian bank account. Adam pays
for Australian private health insurance for the family and has share investments in the airline
on which he receives dividends. From 1 November 2017 until 1 April 2018, Adam was based
at the airline’s hub in Dubai and lived in an apartment leased by the airline. The airline paid
five months of Adam’s $500,000 annual salary directly into a bank account that he
established in Dubai. Adam took annual leave in December and returned to Australia to
spend Christmas with the family.
In May 2018, Adam accepted an offer to relocate with Narelle to Dubai for an indefinite
period. The couple flew to Dubai on 1 July 2018. They established a joint bank account with
a local bank and in November 2018 purchased an apartment close to Dubai airport. The
children moved to a boarding school in Sydney. Adam and Narelle maintained their joint
bank account and private health insurance in Australia and rented out their Sydney home.
Adam took six weeks of annual leave during December 2018 and January 2019 and
returned to Australia with Narelle to spend time with their children and inspect their home.
Required
Advise Adam Collins as to whether he is an Australian resident or non-resident for tax
purposes for the 2017/18 and 2018/19 years. You must include relevant section numbers
and cases in your explanation.

LAW6001 Assessment Brief 3 Case Study T2 2019 Page 3 of 9
Question 2 (10 marks)
In June 2018 Orpheus Parker purchased a ground floor two-bedroom townhouse in Neutral
Bay, Sydney. He decided to rent out part of his townhouse on Airbnb while still living in the
property. The total floor area of the townhouse is 850 sq feet (79 m2). The floor space of
Orpheus’ bedroom and his private area is 250 sq feet (23.2 m2). The rented second
bedroom area is 200 sq feet (18.6 m2). The shared area comprising lounge, kitchen and
laundry cupboard is 400 sq feet (37.2 m2).
The property has been listed since 1 September 2018 and Orpheus has achieved consistent
occupancy rates. During the period of 1 September 2018 to 30 June 2019, the room was
rented for 150 days. Orpheus only offered the room to solo travellers and he has received a
total of $22,500 in rental income. During this period, expenses relating to occupancy costs,
such as mortgage interest, municipal rates, strata levies and home insurance amounted to
$50,000. Orpheus also spent $250 on expenses relating to renting the room, i.e., advertising
fees and consumables supplied for the room.
Required
Advise Orpheus Parker of the tax consequences of using his townhouse to produce rental
income for the 2018/19 income year. Does Orpheus need to register for GST by doing
Airbnb? You must include relevant section numbers in your explanations.
Question 3 (15 marks)
In 1975, Joe Messina purchased five hectares of land 40 km from Sydney’s CBD. The land
was used for agricultural pursuits, with produce sold through Sydney markets. In the year
2000 the government proposed construction of an airport adjacent to Joe’s land.
Subsequently, in 2005 Joe sold the land for $700,000 and used this entire amount to acquire
a large block of land closer to Sydney with the intention of keeping the land as a retirement
nest-egg. In 2016, Joe was approached by a real estate developer to construct eight
townhouses on the land. Joe accepted the proposal and employed architects, builders and
obtained development approval from the local council. Joe oversaw the development and
engaged real estate agents to market the townhouses for sale upon completion. During the
course of the 2018/19 income year seven townhouses were sold for $650,000 each. Joe
retired to the remaining townhouse.
Required
Advise Joe Messina about whether the proceeds from his land and building transactions
constitute assessable income and the basis on which they may be assessed. You must
include relevant section numbers and cases in your explanation.

LAW6001 Assessment Brief 3 Case Study T2 2019 Page 4 of 9
Question 4 (20 marks)
Harrison Carter, an Australian resident, seeks advice on the CGT consequences of the
following events.
1. He exchanged contracts for the acquisition of an investment property, at market
value, on 24 January 1999, paying a 10% deposit of $80,000. Property settlement
was deferred until 5 December 2001, when the balance of $720,000 was paid, title
transferred, and his name was recorded as the registered proprietor. At the time of
settlement the market value of the property was $1m. He sold the property on 14
June 2018 for $1.3m.
2. He acquired 10,000 shares in Star Entertainment Ltd in October 1985, paying $4 per
share. He decided to sell his entire shareholding, for $12 per share, and signed a
share transfer document and handed the transfer and share script to the Stock
Exchange on 20 June 2018. The transfer was not registered with Star Entertainment
Ltd until 10 July 2018.
3. He incurred a capital loss in 2018/19 amounting to $65,000.
Required
Advise net capital gains (losses) to be included in Harrison Carter’s tax return for the years
ending 2018 and 2019. Include
ALL available methods for calculating a capital gain for both
years. You must explain the timing of a CGT event with relevant section numbers and cases.

LAW6001 Assessment brief 3 Case study T2 2019 Page 5 of 9
Learning Rubrics

Assessment
Attributes
Fail (Unacceptable) (Functional) Pass (Proficient) Credit (Advanced) Distinction High Distinction (Exceptional)
Grade Description
(Grading Scheme)
Evidence of unsatisfactory
achievement of one or more of the
learning objectives of the course,
insufficient understanding of the
course content and/or unsatisfactory
level of skill development.
Evidence of
satisfactory
achievement of
course learning
objectives, the
development of
relevant skills to a
competent level, and
adequate
interpretation and
critical analysis skills.
Evidence of a good
level of
understanding,
knowledge and skill
development in
relation to the content
of the course or work
of a superior quality
on the majority of the
learning objectives of
the course.
Demonstration of a
high level of
interpretation and
critical analysis skills.
Evidence of a
high level of
achievement of
the learning
objectives of the
course
demonstrated in
such areas as
interpretation and
critical analysis,
logical argument,
use of
methodology and
communication
skills.
Evidence of an
exceptional level of
achievement of
learning objectives
across the entire
content of the
course
demonstrated in
such areas as
interpretation and
critical analysis,
logical argument,
creativity, originality,
use of methodology
and communication
skills.
Knowledge and
understanding
Limited understanding of required
concepts and knowledge
Key components of the assignment
are not addressed.
Knowledge or
understanding of the
field or discipline.
Resembles a recall or
summary of key
ideas.
Often
conflates/confuses
assertion of personal
opinion with
information
Thorough knowledge
or understanding of
the field or
discipline/s. Supports
personal opinion and
information
substantiated by
evidence from the
research/course
materials.
Demonstrates a
capacity to explain
Highly developed
understanding of
the field or
discipline/s.
Discriminates
between
assertion of
personal opinion
and information
substantiated by
robust evidence
from the
A sophisticated
understanding of the
field or discipline/s.
Systematically and
critically
discriminates
between assertion
of personal opinion
and information
substantiated by
robust evidence
from the

LAW6001 Assessment brief 3 Case study T2 2019 Page 6 of 9

30%
Points for this
criteria
0-2 substantiated by
evidence from the
research/course
materials.
3-4
and apply relevant
concepts.
5-6
research/course
materials and
extended
reading.
Well
demonstrated
capacity to
explain and apply
relevant
concepts.
7-8
research/course
materials and
extended reading.
Mastery of concepts
and application to
new
situations/further
learning.
9-10
Critical reasoning,
presentation and
defence of an
argument and/or
position
30%
Points for this
criteria
Specific position (perspective or
argument) fails to take into account
the complexities of the issue(s) or
scope of the assignment.
Makes assertions that are not
justified.
Specific position
(perspective or
argument) begins to
take into account the
issue(s) or scope of
the assignment.
Justifies any
conclusions reached
with arguments not
merely assertion.
4 -7
Specific position
(perspective or
argument) takes into
account the
complexities of the
issue(s) or scope of
the assignment.
Others’ points of view
are acknowledged.
Justifies any
conclusions reached
with well-formed
arguments not merely
assertion.
8-11
Specific position
(perspective or
argument) is
expertly
presented and
accurately takes
into account the
complexities of
the issue(s) and
scope of the
assignment.
Justifies any
conclusions
reached with
well-developed
arguments.
12-16
Specific position
(perspective or
argument) is
presented expertly,
authoritatively and
imaginatively,
accurately taking
into account the
complexities of the
issue(s) and scope
of the assignment.
Limits of position are
acknowledged.
Justifies any
conclusions reached
with sophisticated
arguments.
17-20

LAW6001 Assessment brief 3 Case study T2 2019 Page 7 of 9

0-0-3
Formation of
recommendations
based on the
identification of the
issues and the
application of case
law principles and
relevant legislation
identified in the
research process.
20%
Points for this
criteria
Difficulty in formulating own opinion
and a lack of recognition of the
various issues. A lack of application
of the relevant case law and/or
relevant legislation
0-3
Difficulty in justifying
own opinion. Some
recognition and
discussion of the
various issues.
Some application of
the relevant case law
and/or relevant
legislation
4 – 6
Own opinion is partly
justified with
reference to case law
and/or relevant
legislation.
Recognition and
discussion of the
various issues
identified in the
question Application
of the relevant case
law and/or relevant
legislation to these
issues
7-10
Own opinion is
justified with
reference to case
law and/or
relevant
legislation.
Recognition and
discussion of the
various issues
identified in the
question plus
others identified
by the student
Application of the
relevant case law
and/or relevant
legislation to
these issues
11- 15
Sophisticated
arguments
supporting own
opinion is justified
with reference to
case law and/or
relevant legislation.
Recognition and
discussion of the
various issues
identified in the
question plus others
identified by the
student and
problems identified
Application of the
relevant case law
and/or relevant
legislation to these
issues
16-20
Use of academic
and discipline
conventions and
sources of evidence
Poorly written with errors in spelling,
grammar.
Demonstrates inconsistent use of
good quality, credible and relevant
research sources to support and
develop ideas.
Is written according to
academic genre (e.g.
with introduction,
conclusion or
summary) and has
accurate spelling,
grammar, sentence
Is well-written and
adheres to the
academic genre (e.g.
with introduction,
conclusion or
summary).
Is very well
written and
adheres to the
academic genre.
Consistently
demonstrates
Expertly written and
adheres to the
academic genre.
Demonstrates
expert use of high
quality, credible and

LAW6001 Assessment brief 3 Case study T2 2019 Page 8 of 9

10%
Points for this
criteria
There are mistakes in using the APA
style.
0-2
and paragraph
construction.
Demonstrates
consistent use of
credible and relevant
research sources to
support and develop
ideas, but these are
not always explicit or
well developed.
There are no
mistakes in using the
APA style.
3-4
Demonstrates
consistent use of high
quality, credible and
relevant research
sources to support
and develop ideas.
There are no
mistakes in using the
APA style.
5-6
expert use of
good quality,
credible and
relevant research
sources to
support and
develop
appropriate
arguments and
statements.
Shows evidence
of reading
beyond the key
reading
There are no
mistakes in using
the APA style.
7-8
relevant research
sources to support
and develop
arguments and
position statements.
Shows extensive
evidence of reading
beyond the key
reading
There are no
mistakes in using
the APA Style.
9-10
Effective
communication
10%
The reader has difficulty following
the points being made, lack of
logical/clear
Structure, poor flow of ideas,
argument lacks supporting evidence
0-2
The arguments and
supporting evidence
are not always
presented in clear
and logical manner.
Spelling errors and
sentence structure
makes meaning
unclear
Information,
arguments and
evidence are well
presented, relevant
and show a clear flow
of ideas with logical
development
The information,
arguments and
evidence are very
well presented,
with clear logical
development of
ideas which
answer the issue
as set, with some
consideration of
related or flow
issues
Excellent
presentation with
clear and logical
arguments
supported by
relevant and varied
evidence. The
student answers the
issue and considers
in detail some
related or flow
issues with possible
ramifications.

LAW6001 Assessment brief 3 Case study T2 2019 Page 9 of 9

Points for this
criteria
3-4 5-6
Point range
7-8 9-10