ACCG8150, S1, 2023
Assessment 2: Sustainability Report
Due: 28 April 2023. Unless an application for Special Consideration has been submitted and approved,
a 5% penalty (of the total possible mark) will be applied each day a written assessment is not
submitted, up until the 7th day (including weekends). After the 7th day, a grade of ‘0’ will be awarded
even if the assessment is submitted. Submission time for all written assessments is set at 11.55 pm. A
1-hour grace period is provided to students who experience a technical concern. Please check the unit
guide for more information.
Required: Students are required to analyse the Qantas Sustainability Report 2022 (available on
iLearn). Drawing on publications in leading academic and professional journals, students are required
to identify adopted impression management strategies and develop specific recommendations on
how to improve Qantas’s corporate communication. Specifically, students are required to do the
following:
1. Identify Qantas’s adopted main impression management strategies and critically evaluate which of
those strategies are used effectively and ineffectively. Use relevant examples from the Sustainability
Report 2022 to illustrate your answer.
2. Develop and suggest recommended changes to Qantas’s impression management practices that
could improve the ideas, feelings, or opinions of the readers of the Sustainability Report 2022. Your
recommendations should reflect on what extent Qantas’s impression management strategies are
consistent with the GRI’s guiding principles and goals.
ACCG8150, S1, 2023
Format: The word limit is 2000 words. Your word count must be included on your cover page. Nothing
is to be excluded from the word count. If you exceed the word limit, 10% of the total marks will be
deducted as a penalty. In-text referencing is required for all sources used and a complete list of
references must be provided using APA Style – 7th Edition. More information about this referencing
style is available from the library: https://libguides.mq.edu.au/referencing/APA7thEdition
Your submission must contain the following (i.e., all files must be combined into one file and in this
order):
• Cover page (You can design your own cover page)
• Report
• Reference list
The style must be as follows:
• Font – Times New Roman
• Size – 12point
• Spacing – 1.5 lines
• Margins not less than 2.5 cm
Each page must have a footer containing the following:
• ACCG8150, S1, 2023
• Your SID
• Page number
Submission: This assessment represents 30% of your total mark for ACCG8150 and is compulsory. The
assessment must be submitted in electronic form using Turnitin (through iLearn). Please ensure that
you submit it before the deadline in case of technical issues. A hardcopy submission is not required.
The report can be submitted either in a PDF or word format. The filename of your report must be as
follows: ACCG8150_XXXXXXXX (where the crosses represent your SID). All assignments will be checked
for plagiarism and it is extremely important that you are familiar with the policy on Academic Honesty.
ACCG8150, S1, 2023
Not Attempted |
Fail | Pass | Credit | Distinction | High Distinction | |
1. Identification of adopted impression management strategies |
Not attempted or entirely or significantly plagiarized from other sources. 0 marks |
Does not identify IM strategies adequately and/or includes incorrect information. Analysis incomplete or mainly faulty. Information predominantly irrelevant. 4 marks |
Includes the majority of relevant details, although some analysis/ discussion may be faulty. The evaluation of adopted IM strategies is limited to weak generalisations. Refers to Qantas’s sustainability report. 5 marks |
Mostly complete explanation. Provides a variety of relevant examples from the sustainability report. Analysis/discussion mostly accurate but more needed. Effectiveness of adopted IM strategies is evaluated critically, with some specific examples provided. 7 marks |
Provides a comprehensive overview of adopted IM strategies. Provides a variety of relevant examples from the sustainability report. Effectiveness of adopted IM strategies is evaluated comprehensively, with a variety of specific examples provided. 8 marks |
Provides a sophisticated overview of adopted IM strategies. Provides a variety of relevant examples from the sustainability report. Analysis/ discussion accurate and insightful. Sophisticated evaluation of adopted IM strategies, with a variety of specific examples provided. 10 marks |
2.Recommendations | Not attempted or entirely or significantly plagiarized from other sources. 0 marks |
Provides no recommendations and/or is limited to weak generalisations. 6 marks |
Provides some meaningful recommendations but in insufficient detail. The GRI’s guiding principles and goals are considered. 7.5 marks |
Provides some meaningful recommendations in sufficient detail. The GRI’s guiding principles and goals are considered in sufficient detail. 10.5 marks |
Provides meaningful recommendations in great detail. Insightful integration of the GRI’s guiding principles and goals into the recommendations. 12 marks |
Provides excellent recommendations in great detail. Insightful integration of the GRI’s guiding principles and goals into the recommendations. 15 marks |
ACCG8150, S1, 2023
3. Document formatting and written expression |
Not attempted or entirely or significantly plagiarized from other sources. 0 marks |
Fails to follow assignment requirement. Too short or too long. Strongly affect reader due to formatting errors and confusing organisation. Too informal or errors in grammar make meaning unclear. Minimal referencing. 2 marks |
Occasionally meets the assignment requirement. Distracts reader due to formatting errors. Organisation of paragraphs causes some confusion. Sometimes too informal or errors in grammar make meaning unclear in places. Noticeable errors in referencing. 2.5 marks |
Occasionally meets the assignment requirement. Occasionally include formatting errors. Organisation of sections and paragraphs generally clear. Generally appropriate tone. Frequently used referencing system correctly. 3.5 marks |
Mostly meets the assignment requirement. Rarely include formatting errors. Clear organisation of sections and paragraphs. Appropriate tone. Uses referencing consistently and accurately with very few minor errors. 4 marks |
Meets all the assignment requirements. Used professional, correct formatting. Clear organisation of sections and paragraphs with excellent flow. Appropriate tone. Uses referencing consistently and accurately in all aspects. 5 marks |