Stakeholders and Organizational Effectiveness

Stakeholders and Organizational Effectiveness – Rubric Total 240 points

Criterion	1. Unsatisfactory	2. Less Than Satisfactory	3. Satisfactory	4. Good	5. Excellent
Research-Based Discussion of the Methods of Stakeholder Management Research-Based Discussion of the Methods of Stakeholder Management	0 points A research-based discussion of the methods of stakeholder management is either missing or not evident to the reader.	44.4 points A research-based discussion of the methods of stakeholder management is present, but inaccurate, illogical, or presents unethical ideas.	47.4 points A research-based discussion of the methods of stakeholder management is presented, but is cursory and lacking in depth.	52.2 points A research-based discussion of the methods of stakeholder management is present and thorough.	60 points A research-based discussion of the methods of stakeholder management is thoroughly presented with rich detail.
Research-Based Discussion of the Nature of Stakeholder Management Research-Based Discussion of the Nature of Stakeholder Management	0 points A research-based discussion of the nature of stakeholder management is either missing or not evident to the reader.	26.64 points A research-based discussion of the nature of stakeholder management is present, but inaccurate or incomplete.	28.44 points A research-based discussion of the nature of stakeholder management is presented, but is cursory and lacking in depth.	31.32 points A research-based discussion of the nature of stakeholder management is present and thorough.	36 points A research-based discussion of the nature of stakeholder management is thoroughly presented with rich detail.
Synthesis and Argument Synthesis and Argument	0 points No synthesis of source information is evident. Statement of purpose is not followed to a justifiable conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses non credible sources.	17.76 points Synthesis of source information is attempted, but is not successful. Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.	18.96 points Synthesis of source information is present, but pedantic. Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.	20.88 points Synthesis of source information is present and meaningful. Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.	24 points Synthesis of source information is present and scholarly. Argument is clear and convincing, presenting a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
Research-Based Discussion of How Stakeholder Management Can Influence Organizational Effectiveness Research-Based Discussion of How Stakeholder Management Can Influence Organizational Effectiveness	0 points A research-based discussion of how stakeholder management can influence organizational effectiveness is either missing or not evident to the reader.	53.28 points A research-based discussion of how stakeholder management can influence organizational effectiveness is present, but inaccurate or illogical.	56.88 points A research-based discussion of how stakeholder management can influence organizational effectiveness is presented, but is cursory and lacking in depth.	62.64 points A research-based discussion of how stakeholder management can influence organizational effectiveness is present and thorough.	72 points A research-based discussion of how stakeholder management can influence organizational effectiveness is thoroughly presented with rich detail.
APA Format APA Format	0 points Required format is rarely followed correctly. No reference page is included. No in-text citations are used.	8.88 points Required format elements are missing or incorrect. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. Reference page is present. However, in-text citations are inconsistently used.	9.48 points Required format is generally correct. However, errors are present (e.g. font, cover page, margins, and in-text citations). Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented though some errors are present.	10.44 points Required format is used, but minor errors are present (e.g. headings and direct quotes). Reference page is present and includes all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and citation style is usually correct.	12 points The document is correctly formatted. In-text citations and a reference page are complete and correct. The documentation of cited sources is free of error.
Thesis Development and Purpose Thesis Development and Purpose	0 points Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.	17.76 points Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear.	18.96 points Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose.	20.88 points Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.	24 points Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
Mechanics of Writing Mechanics of Writing	0 points	8.88 points	9.48 points	10.44 points	12 points

Criterion	1. Unsatisfactory	2. Less Than Satisfactory	3. Satisfactory	4. Good	5. Excellent
Mechanical errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used.	Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present.	Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience appropriate language are used.	Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used.	Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.