Requirement Engineering

141 views 8:37 am 0 Comments February 28, 2023
ASSESSMENT 2 BRIEF
Subject Code and Title MIS604 Requirement Engineering
Assessment Requirements Documentation & Lifecycle Management Report
Individual/Group Group
Length 2500 words (+/- 10%)
Learning Outcomes The Subject Learning Outcomes demonstrated by successful completion of the task below include: Critically evaluate requirements management as it applies to a variety of organisational environments.   Demonstrate methods for eliciting, analysing, documenting, and maintaining requirements in an organisational context.   Evaluate organisational requirements to maximise effectiveness and promote sustainable business practices.
Submission By 11:55pm AEST/AEDT Sunday end of Week 8/Module 4.2 For Intensive class: By 11:55pm AEST/AEDT Sunday end of Week 4/Module 4.2
Weighting 40%
Total Marks 100 marks

Assessment Task

Context

Text Box: The focus of Assessment 1 was on the elicitation of requirements. In this second assessment, you will come together as a team and progress to the next step in the requirements process: requirements analysis & documentation, and requirements lifecycle management. Here you will focus on specifying, modelling, verifying, and validating requirements using Business Analysis best practice after which you will focus on Requirements Lifecycle Management. This assessment aims to assist you in developing workplace relevant business analysis skills in a predictive planning context.

Task Instructions

  1. Team Formation
    1. You are required to form teams of 4-5 members
    1. Team formation will be decided by the Learning Facilitator in consultation with the class.
    1. The deadline for team registration is 11:55pm AEST/AEDT Sunday end of Module 2.1 (Week 3). For

intensive class, the deadline is 11:55pm AEST/AEDT Sunday end of Module 2/Week 2

  • To register your team, you are required to send your Learning Facilitator an email with “[MIS604] Team Registration” in the subject line. In the body of the email, please list the names and student ID numbers of all the members of your team.
    • You are required to send the registration email to our facilitator before the registration deadline.
    • After the registration deadline, those students who are not in a team will be allocated to a team by the Learning Facilitator.

2.  Please read MIS604_Assessment_Case Study

  • Write 2500 words (+/-10%) requirements document and lifecycle management group report which reflects the given case study.
  • The report DOES NOT require an executive summary or abstract.
  • Structure of the Group Report
    • A professional custom title page with the subject code and subject name, assignment title, student’s name, student number and lecturer’s name

·       Table of contents

  • An introduction (100-150 words) which will also serve as your statement of purpose for the report. This means that you will tell the reader what you are going to cover in your report. You will need to inform the reader of:
    • The key concepts you will be addressing,
    • What the reader can expect to find in the body of the report
  • The body of the report (2200-2300 words) will need to cover two specific areas:
    • Requirements Documentation – all items should contain unique identifier and priority (where applicable)
      • Project scope
      • Major features of the project over initial and subsequent releases
      • Three (03) business requirements
      • Five functional requirements as requirement catalogue (following the characteristics of

‘good’ requirement)

  • Five non-functional requirements (e.g., performance, usability, security, safety, availability perspectives). This also need to follow the characteristics of ‘good’ requirement.
    • Map out swim lane diagrams for two (02) key processes, which will be supported by the system
  • Requirements Life Cycle Management.
    • Discus five knowledge areas/activities for the Requirements Lifecycle management: trace, maintain, prioritise, assess, and approve and justify for the given case study.
    • From requirement management best practices, select three (03) most important practices for the given case study and describe them briefly. Then justify why you think they are most important.
    • A Requirements Traceability Matrix (RTM) to manage the requirements through each stage of the requirements lifecycle populated with the requirements identified in the first part of this assessment. You may use Excel for your Requirement Traceability Matrix. An example of RTM template can be like the following:
Business objectives Business requirements Functional requirements Non- functi onal requi reme nts Design element Source file Functions Test cases Status
… … … … … … … … …
  The conclusion (100-150 words) will summarise any findings or recommendations that the report puts forward regarding the concepts covered in the report.Reference listAppendix (if required)   Report Format and Layout The report should use font Arial or Calibri 11 point, should be line spaced at 1.5 for ease of reading and page numbers on the bottom of each page. If diagrams or tables are used, please follow APA 7 guideline for the same. Due attention should be given to pagination to avoid loss of meaning and continuity by unnecessarily splitting information over two pages. Diagrams and tables must carry the appropriate captioning.   Peer evaluation Group participation will constitute the final 20% of the mark for Assessment 2. Participation will be determined as follows: Each student in the team will evaluate the other members’ contributions using a participation score matrix (see Group Participation Score Matrix attached) Individually, each team member will assign a “Group participation score” (from 1-5) for each member of the group using the score matrix.Each student is to assess peers’ contributions according to the Peer Evaluation Grading Scheme.The participation score matrix submitted by each individual student via the Assessment 2 link at the same time as the final group digital presentation submission.The Facilitator will use the average “group participation score” for each member to determine the weighted ‘Teamwork’ criterion row in the final marking rubric for this assessment.All peer evaluation submissions are confidential not viewed by the other team members.   Assessment rubric You are strongly advised to read the rubric which is an evaluation guide with criteria for grading the assignment. This will give them a clear picture of what a successful report looks like.