FALL 2021
MARKETING 1 (MKTG19439)
MAJOR PROJECT
PROJECT COMPONENTS
This project consists of 4 parts:
• Group Contract (2%)
• Group Industry Analysis (10%)
• Individual Brand Analysis (15%)
• Individual Presentation (8%)
RESEARCH GUIDELINES
• You will search CREDIBLE sources on the internet and use online academic databases provided
through Sheridan Library. Use the Marketing 1 Research Guide
(http://sheridancollege.libguides.com/Marketing1) to get started with your research. You can ask
the Library for assistance with research including searching online, using academic databases,
locating industry and company information, and APA formatting.
• This project requires students to create a SWOT analysis. Students must research internal facts and
external trends and put this information into the appropriate categories. You may NOT use a premade SWOT or analysis that someone else published on the internet. These sources include, but are
not limited to the Sheridan Library databases, SlideShare, MBA Skool, PESTLE analysis, scribd,
freeswotanalysis.com, Study Moose, and Marketing 91. Use of these sources is considered a Breach of
Academic Integrity.
• This project requires students to create a 4Ps analysis. Students must research product, price, place
and promotion from multiple credible courses and put this information together. You may NOT use a
pre-made 4Ps analysis that someone else published on the internet. This is considered a Breach of
Academic Integrity.
• All information and data must be paraphrased. You may not use quotes or quotations. This is
considered a Breach of Academic Integrity.
• You may not use Wikipedia as a source. This is considered a Breach of Academic Integrity.
APA REFERENCES
• Detailed secondary research that is properly cited; in-depth analysis and professional
documentation/presentation are essential. Use the APA Citation Guide
(http://sheridancollege.libguides.com/citation_guide) to properly cite those sources.
• You must include an in-text citation after each point that you are listing in your report. This citation
should include the author of the publication, the date of publication and the page number where the
information you have included can be found. An example is (Smith, 2005, p. 57).
• You must also include a complete reference list (on a separate page) at the end of your report which
includes a list of all of the articles you have used in your report in alphabetical order. Here are two
examples of what a reference list entry should look like:
From Marketing magazine website:
Jones, F. (2004, October 14). Trends in Advertising. Marketing Magazine. Retrieved from
www.marketingmag.ca
From academic database:
Warren, M. (2007). Do celebrity endorsements still work? Campaign, p.13. Retrieved from
http://search.proquest.com/docview/227461444?accountid=3455
PROJECT SCENARIO
Here is an example of a situation that you should consider when approaching this project:
• Imagine that you have just graduated from the marketing diploma program at Sheridan, and you have
been hired as a marketing support person with the Nestlé company. You are working with brands
such as Perrier and Pure Life in the marketing department.
• Your manager wants you to familiarize yourself with the bottled water market. He/she wants you to
become familiar with trends in this market and the marketing activities of the various companies.
Your manager wants you to report your findings in the form of a presentation.
• Your analysis should focus on the Canadian/North American market.
INSTRUCTIONS
• You will be assigned to a group of 4 students.
• Choose an industry from the list attached in Appendix A (the bottled water market situation
discussed earlier is just an example). Your professor must approve your selection.
• Meet with your group to establish rules for working together.
• Go to the Marketing 1 Research Guide. Become familiar with the tabs and the information available.
• Complete the Group Contract provided in SLATE and submit it before the due date.
• Industries and brands will be confirmed by your professor.
• Please read the rubrics for all project components. This will give you a clear idea of expectations and
requirements.
GROUP INDUSTRY ANALYSIS
A scan of the Marketing Environment is an essential step in developing any marketing strategy or plan.
You need to understand the customers, trends, the competition and the external factors that may impact
decisions.
Reference Chapter 2 in the textbook for an overview of each environmental force that you will research
for your report.
Research
In order to complete your Industry Environmental Scan, you will want to conduct a significant amount of
secondary research using the internet and the Sheridan databases. Use the Marketing 1 Research Guide.
• Although this is a group project, each group member is expected to find at least 6 references for
this report. Each group member will submit their 6 references with the assignment.
• You are expected to have at least 4 trends in each category.
• Only include references that are current within the last 3 years.
• Students must research external trends and put this information into the appropriate categories.
You may NOT use a pre-made SWOT or analysis that someone else published on the internet.
These sources include, but are not limited to the Sheridan Library databases, SlideShare, MBA
Skool, PESTLE analysis, scribd, freeswotanalysis.com, Study Moose, and Marketing 91. This is
considered a Breach of Academic Integrity.
Instructions
• Your report should cover Demographic, Socio-cultural, Economic, Technological,
Competitive/Industry and Regulatory forces affecting your selected industry. These are forces
that are external to any specific company.
• For each fact that you uncover, you will need to determine whether it is an opportunity or a
threat. Opportunities are facts that can have a positive influence on the industry. Threats are
facts that can have a negative influence on the industry.
• Place an ‘O’ beside facts that are Opportunities and a ‘T’ beside facts that are Threats.
• Once you have categorized your Opportunities and Threats, you should explain why it is an
Opportunity or Threat. What is the potential impact on the industry?
• Place the name of the group member beside each of the points that they have contributed to the
report (see sample). Each group member will submit their 6 references with the assignment.
• Provide one electronic copy in SLATE per group.
• Each group member will submit their 6 references with the assignment.
• All must be submitted on time to avoid a late penalty.
• Review the rubric.
• All information and data must be paraphrased. You cannot use quotes or quotations.
• An example of the format you can use based on the eReader industry is in Slate.
MKTG 19439— INDUSTRY ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS RUBRIC
Not Acceptable (<50%) |
Needs Improvement (50-64%) |
Good (65-79%) |
Excellent (80-100%) |
Mark | Comments |
Demographic | Identified 0‐1 relevant factors Little or no description. |
Identified 1‐2 relevant factors. Adequate description. |
Identified 3 relevant factors. Good description. |
Includes 4 or more relevant facts. Excellent description. |
/10 |
Socio‐Cultural | Identified 0‐1 relevant factors Little or no description. |
Identified 1‐2 relevant factors. Adequate description. |
Identified 3 relevant factors. Good description. |
Includes 4 or more relevant facts. Excellent description. |
/10 |
Economic | Identified 0‐1 relevant factors Little or no description. |
Identified 1‐2 relevant factors. Adequate description. |
Identified 3 relevant factors. Good description. |
Includes 4 or more relevant facts. Excellent description. |
/10 |
Technological | Identified 0‐1 relevant factors Little or no description. |
Identified 1‐2 relevant factors. Adequate description. |
Identified 3 relevant factors. Good description. |
Includes 4 or more relevant facts. Excellent description. |
/10 |
Regulatory | Identified 0‐1 relevant factors Little or no description. |
Identified 1‐2 relevant factors. Adequate description. |
Identified 3 relevant factors. Good description. |
Includes 4 or more relevant facts. Excellent description. |
/10 |
Competitive/ Industry |
Identified 0‐1 relevant factors Little or no description. |
Identified 1‐2 relevant factors. Adequate description. |
Identified 3 relevant factors. Good description. |
Includes 4 or more relevant facts. Excellent description. |
/10 |
Opportunities and Threats |
Many errors were made when identifying factors as opportunities or threats. Explanations are missing or incomplete. |
Several errors were made when identifying factors as opportunities or threats. Some critical information is missing from the explanations. |
Correctly identified most of the external factors as an opportunity or a threat. Explanation is generally complete. |
Correctly identified all external factors as either an opportunity or a threat. Consistently provided exceptional explanation. |
/30 |
Appropriate use of reference sources |
Little or no attempt to paraphrase content. Little to no attempt to use in‐text citations. Did not include a properly formatted reference list. Only included hyperlinks to references (50% or greater) The majority of sources are not credible or are outdated. The total number of references used reflects less than 2 references for each group member. |
Content is not paraphrased. Missing many in‐text citations. Many errors in APA formatting. Missing many references from the reference list. Many errors in APA formatting. Several sources are not credible and some references are outdated (more than 3 years old). The total number of references used reflects 2‐4 references for each group member. |
Content is paraphrased. A few errors in formatting or did not use in‐text citations consistently. Not all references have a matching in‐text citation. (< 20%). A few errors in formatting the reference list or references missing (< 20%). The majority of sources are credible and current (within 3 years). The total number of references used reflects 4‐ 6 references for each group member. |
Content is paraphrased. Consistent and correct use of APA format for in‐text citations. Each reference in the list has a matching in‐text citation. Consistent and correct use of APA format for the reference list. A variety of highly credible and current references are used. The total number of references used reflects at least 6 references for each group member. |
/10 |
Deductions (if any) Lateness (as per the late penalty policy) A minimum of 6 references were not submitted (individual) ‐10% Appearance (depends on the extent of the issue with appearance) Spelling & Grammar (depends on the extent of the spelling and grammar errors) |
|||||
Total | /100 |
INDIVIDUAL BRAND ANALYSIS
Each group member will conduct a thorough analysis of one of the brands that competes in the industry
selected. Your brand should be owned by a PUBLIC company as there will be more research information
available to you.
Format
You are expected to include the following information in your report:
Company Background Provide a brief history Discuss the size of the company and its growth (provide sales for the past 3 years and growth rates) |
Segments chart – Prepare a table showing two key segments for the company and a description of each segment using demographic, geographic, psychographic and behavioural variables. Highlight primary segment. Provide 3-4 reasons for selecting this segment as primary. |
Describe the 4 Ps for the brand: Product, Price, Place, Promotion |
Competitive Advantage – what is unique about this company in comparison to the competition? Prepare your response based upon the research you have conducted. |
SWOT – Prepare a SWOT analysis. It must be developed from your own research. Strengths: positive internal company factors such as: company reputation, high market share, innovativeness, anything positive in current 4Ps Weaknesses: negative internal company factors such as: low quality, limited product line, poor reputation, anything negative in current 4Ps Opportunities and Threats: are external elements that the company has no control over (you should select the opportunities and threats from your Group Industry Analysis. Make sure that any feedback you received from your professor is incorporated. |
Reference List |
Instructions
• This analysis should be submitted in a Microsoft Word document.
• All information must be paraphrased and follow the research guidelines described earlier.
• Include a title page.
• Use in-text citations and include a reference list at the end of the document.
• You may NOT use a pre-made SWOT or 4Ps analysis that someone else published on the internet.
These sources include, but are not limited to the Sheridan Library databases, SlideShare, MBA
Skool, PESTLE analysis, scribd, freeswotanalysis.com, Study Moose, and Marketing 91.
• Please provide one electronic copy in SLATE per person.
• All must be submitted on time to avoid a late penalty.
• Use the grading rubric to understand the expectations and requirements.
• An example of the format you can use based on a Brand Analysis of Kobo is in Slate.
MKTG19439 BRAND ANALYSIS RUBRIC
Not Acceptable (<50%) |
Needs Improvement (50-64%) |
Good (65-79%) |
Excellent (80-100%) |
Mark | Comments |
Company Background |
• Background information not provided or very little information. • Performance data is missing. |
• Insufficient background information provided on the company. • Data on the company’s performance is not sufficient. |
• History of the company is missing some relevant information. • Company’s performance is not clearly outlined. |
• Brief history provided. • An overview of the company’s current performance including size and growth rate. |
/5 |
Segmentation Chart |
• Little understanding/ incorrect understanding of the segmentation variables. • Provides inadequate description for each segmentation variable. • 0-1 reasons given for selection of the primary segment. |
• Some understanding of the segmentation variables is demonstrated. • Provides some description for each segmentation variable. • 1-2 reasons given for selection of the primary segment. |
• Very good understanding of the segmentation variables is demonstrated. • Provides good description of the segment variables. • 2-3 reasons given for selection of the primary segment. |
• Displays excellent understanding of the segmentation variables. • Provides excellent description of the segment variables. • 3-4 reasons given for selection of the primary segment. |
/20 |
Product, Price, Place and Promotion |
• May be missing one of the 4 Ps. • Descriptions are missing or are missing many important points. • Limited to no examples provided. |
• Each of the 4 Ps is described for the company. • Limited explanation. • May be missing examples. |
• Each of the 4 Ps is described for the company with sufficient explanation but may be missing some critical information. • Some examples are provided. |
• Each of the 4 Ps is described for the company with extensive explanation and examples. |
/20 |
Competitive Advantage |
• Competitive advantage is not outlined or doesn’t make sense. • Rationale is not included. |
• Competitive advantage is not clearly described compared to the competition. • Rationale is missing a significant amount of information. |
• Competitive advantage is not clearly described compared to the competition. • Rationale is not complete. |
• Clearly defined what is unique about this company in comparison to the competition. • Strong rationale is provided. |
/5 |
SWOT | • Identified 0-1 facts in each quadrant with little or no explanation. • Information is not current. • A great deal of critical info is missing. • Insufficient research. • No feedback incorporated from the industry environmental analysis. |
• Identified 1-2 facts for each quadrant with adequate explanation. • Information may be out of date. • Some critical info is missing. • Little research conducted. • Much of the feedback was not incorporated from the industry environmental analysis. |
• Identified 2-4 facts for each quadrant with good explanation. • Some information may be out of date. • A small amount of critical information may be missing, • A fair amount of research conducted. • Some feedback incorporated from the industry environmental analysis. |
• Includes more than 4 facts for each quadrant. • Correctly identified the most current and relevant information and trends. • All facts are clear and complete. • Extensive research conducted. • Feedback incorporated from the industry environmental analysis. |
/20 |
MKTG19439 BRAND ANALYSIS RUBRIC
Not Acceptable (<50%) |
Needs Improvement (50-64%) |
Good (65-79%) |
Excellent (80-100%) |
Mark | Comments |
Appropriate use of reference sources |
• Little or no attempt to paraphrase content. • Little to no attempt to use in-text citations (50% or greater). • Did not include a properly formatted reference list. Only included hyperlinks to references (50% or greater) • The majority of sources are not credible or are outdated. • Less than 5 references used in the report. |
• Content is not paraphrased. • Missing many in text citations. Many errors in APA formatting. • Missing many references from the reference list. Many errors in APA formatting. • Several sources are not credible and some references are outdated (more than 5 years old). • 5-9 references used in the report. |
• Content is paraphrased. • A few errors in formatting or did not use in-text citations consistently. Not all references have a matching in-text citation (less than 20%). • A few errors in formatting the reference list or references missing (less than 20%). • The majority of sources are credible and current (within 2 years). • 10-14 references used in the report. |
• Content is paraphrased. • Consistent and correct use of APA format for in-text citations. Each reference in the list has a matching in text citation. • Consistent and correct use of APA format for the reference list. • A variety of highly credible and current references are used. • At least 15 references used in the report. |
/10 |
Deductions (if any) • Lateness (as per the late penalty policy) • Appearance (depends on the extent of the issue with appearance) • Spelling & Grammar (depends on the extent of the spelling and grammar errors) |
|||||
Total | /80 |
INDIVIDUAL PRESENTATION
You will present slides based on your brand/company SWOT. Your presentation should be 4-7 minutes
long not including a question and answer period.
Format
You are expected to include the following information in your presentation:
SWOT – Corrected and updated SWOT from your Individual Brand Analysis. Make sure that any feedback you received from your professor is incorporated. |
Highlight at least 6 potential actions: 1 – build on a strength 2 – correct/minimize a weakness 3 and 4 – exploit an opportunity 5 and 6 – manage a threat |
Reference List |
Instructions
• Use the SWOT from your Individual Brand Analysis. Make sure you correct and update the SWOT,
incorporating any feedback from your professor.
• Potential Actions are YOUR ideas – these do not require references – that should demonstrate
your knowledge of your brand, your industry, and marketing strategy.
• All information and data must be paraphrased. You may not use quotes or quotations. This is
considered a Breach of Academic Integrity.
• Presentations should be developed in PowerPoint. You should include a wide variety of
graphics/images to make your presentation informative and interesting. Images must be cited
using APA formatting.
• Submit your slides according to the due date posted in Slate. Submit on time to avoid a late
penalty.
• Review the rubric.
• Be on time for your presentation, dress professionally, and be prepared to answer questions
about your brand and potential actions.
• An example of a Presentation for Kobo is in Slate.
MKTG19439 BRAND PRESENTATION RUBRIC
Not Acceptable (<50%) |
Needs Improvement (50-64%) |
Good (65-79%) |
Excellent (80-100%) |
Mark | Comments |
CONTENT | |||||
SWOT | • Identified 0-1 facts in each quadrant with little or no explanation. • Information is not current. • A great deal of critical info is missing. • Insufficient research. • No feedback incorporated from the brand analysis. |
• Identified 1-2 facts for each quadrant with adequate explanation. • Information may be out of date. • Some critical info is missing. • Little research conducted. • Much of the feedback was not incorporated from the brand analysis. |
• Identified 2-4 facts for each quadrant with good explanation. • Some information may be out of date. • A small amount of critical information may be missing, • A fair amount of research conducted. • Some feedback incorporated from the brand analysis. |
• Includes more than 4 facts for each quadrant. • Correctly identified the most current and relevant information and trends. • All facts are clear and complete. • Extensive research conducted. • Feedback incorporated from the brand analysis. |
/20 |
Potential Actions |
• Less than 6 potential actions provided and they were not outlined as requested. • Little or no explanation provided. Actions are not logical or feasible. • The actions are not associated with the SWOT analysis. |
• Less than 6 potential actions provided or they were not outlined as requested. • Little explanation or actions may lack clear logic or may not be feasible. • The actions are not clearly associated with the SWOT analysis. |
• At least 6 potential actions were outlined (as requested). • Some information is missing. Explanation is not complete. • The actions are not all clearly associated with the SWOT analysis. |
• Clearly outlined at least 6 potential actions (as requested) with exceptional explanation. • The actions are based on the SWOT analysis. |
/20 |
PRESENTATION | |||||
Visual Aids | • Inadequate. Slides are hard to read, distracting or inadequate for presentation. No visuals used. |
• Ineffective. Slides may be difficult to read and take away from the presentation. Some visuals used. Too much information on many of the slides. |
• Adequate. Readable slides that enhance the presentation. Visuals not optimally used. Too much information on some of the slides. |
• Very professional looking slides. Easy to read. Good use of graphics or other visuals that enhance the presentation. Proper amount of information on the slides. |
/5 |
Presentation Skills |
• Background noise. • Difficult to hear words due to mumbling, soft speaking, speaking too quickly or in a monotone voice. • Answers to questions do not demonstrate brand knowledge. |
• Speaks too quickly or is soft-speaking which interferes with the ability to understand the message. • Answers to questions do not demonstrate brand knowledge. |
• Clear voice. • Speaks fairly clearly but may have issues with pace or volume. • Good answers to questions. |
• Clear voice. • Good pace. • Speaks moderately slowly with good articulation and volume. • Excellent answers to questions. |
/20 |
MKTG19439 BRAND PRESENTATION RUBRIC
Not Acceptable (<50%) |
Needs Improvement (50-64%) |
Good (65-79%) |
Excellent (80-100%) |
Mark | Comments |
RESEARCH AND REFERENCING | |||||
Appropriate use of reference sources |
• Little or no attempt to paraphrase content. • Little to no attempt to use in-text citations (50% or greater). • Did not include a properly formatted reference list. Only included hyperlinks to references (50% or greater) • The majority of sources are not credible or are outdated. |
• Content is not paraphrased. • Missing many in text citations. Many errors in APA formatting. • Missing many references from the reference list. Many errors in APA formatting. • Several sources are not credible and some references are outdated (more than 5 years old). |
• Content is paraphrased. • A few errors in formatting or did not use in-text citations consistently. Not all references have a matching in-text citation (less than 20%). • A few errors in formatting the reference list or references missing (less than 20%). • The majority of sources are credible and current (within 2 years). |
• Content is paraphrased. • Consistent and correct use of APA format for in-text citations. Each reference in the list has a matching in text citation. • Consistent and correct use of APA format for the reference list. • A variety of highly credible and current references are used. |
/5 |
Deductions (if any) • Lateness (as per the late penalty policy) • Appearance (depends on the extent of the issue with appearance) • Spelling & Grammar (depends on the extent of the spelling and grammar errors) |
|||||
Total | /70 |
APPENDIX A – INDUSTRIES
Use the Marketing 1 Research Guide (http://sheridancollege.libguides.com/Marketing1) to learn more
about these industries and brands. The list of brands and companies is not complete – suggest your own!
Should be a public company.
Industries | Brands and Companies |
Ice Cream | Breyers Chapmans Nestle Ben & Jerry’s Haagen Dazs (General Mills) |
Chocolate Bars | Mars Hershey Cadbury Nestle Kit Kat Smarties Coffee Crisp |
Jewellery | Peoples Jewellers (Zales) Tiffany & Co |
Alcohol | Smirnoff (Diageo) Johnnie Walker (Diageo) Jack Daniels (Brown-Forman) |
Snack Foods | Kraft Conagra General Mills Nestle |
Frozen Foods | General Mills Kraft |
Colas | Pepsi Coca-Cola Dr. Pepper |
Cars | Honda Toyota Ford GM Acura (Honda) Lexus (Toyota) BMW Mercedes Benz (Daimler AG) |
Salad Dressing | Kraft Renee’s (Kraft) Hidden Valley (Clorox Company) |
Beer | Heineken Molson Anheuser Busch Moosehead Corona |
Cosmetics | Loreal (Maybelline) Estee Lauder (MAC) Coty Inc. (Covergirl) |
Laundry Detergent | Tide (Procter & Gamble) |
Downy Gain |
|
Coffee Shops | McDonald’s (McCafe) Tim Hortons Starbucks Second Cup |
Home Improvement | Canadian Tire Home Depot Lowe’s Rona |
Department Stores | Hudson Bay Marshalls (TJX Companies) Holt Renfrew (Weston Family/Loblaws) Nordstrom |
Apparel (Clothing Stores) | Nike Adidas Gap H&M |
Hotels | Hilton (The Blackstone Group) Fairmont (Accor Hotels) Sheraton Four Seasons |
Fast Food | McDonald’s Tim Hortons (Restaurant Brands International) Burger King (Restaurant Brands International) Harvey’s (Recipe Unlimited/Cara Foods) |
Airlines | Air Canada WestJet Delta/Northwest Airlines United Airlines Holdings Southwest Airlines |
Restaurants | The Keg Jack Astor’s Swiss Chalet |