PPMP 20010 – Assessment 2
Project Audit and Governance Report
Project name:
Date of report:
Project ownership:
Senior User:
Prepared by:
Distribution list:
INTRODUCTION (100 TO 150 WORDS)
First paragraph: Briefly presents the overall performance of Australian infrastructure projects, also mention the summary of overall international mega projects’ performances.
Second paragraph: Briefly introduce the case study project, its objectives, constraints, and achievements.
Third paragraph: Clarify the purpose of this report.
PROJECT AUDIT REPORT (MAX 900 WORDS)
LIST TWO (2) ISSUES YOU IDENTIFIED FROM THE CASE STUDY RESOURCES PUBLICLYAVAILABLE OR DISCOVERED IN THE AUDIT REPORTS CONDUCTED FOR THE CASE STUDY (150-200 WORDS)
|
Issue 1 |
|
|
Issue 2 |
PROVIDE TWO REASONS FOR EACH ISSUE (150-200 WORDS)
|
Issue 1 |
Reason 1 |
|
|
Reason 2 |
||
|
Issue 2 |
Reason 1 |
|
|
Reason 2 |
PROVIDE TWO RECOMMENDATIONS FOR EACH ISSUE (150-200 WORDS)
|
Issue 1 |
Recommendation 1 |
|
|
Recommendation 2 |
||
|
Issue 2 |
Recommendation 1 |
|
|
Recommendation 2 |
DESCRIBE HOW ABOVE ISSUES AFFECTED MEETING THE SPECIFIED OBJECTIVESOF THE PROJECT (200-300 WORDS)
ACTUAL PERFORMANCE: STATE WHETHER FOLLOWING CRITERIA HAVE BEEN MET /NOT MET/ PARTIALLY MET FOR THIS PROJECT AND PROVIDE REASONS FOR NOT MET OR PARTIALLY MET (200-300 WORDS)
|
Criteria |
Met/ Not Met/ partially Met |
Reasons of (Not Met/ Partially Met) |
|
Scope |
||
|
Cost |
||
|
Schedule |
||
|
Quality |
||
Governance (max 800 words)
PRINCE2 states that the project board should have the overall responsibility for governance of the projects.
Please provide the governance structure and describe the responsibilities of three (3) project board members in a tabular format in the context of the case study provided. You must describe 2-3 responsibilities of each member of the project board.
GOVERNANCE STRACTURE & RESPONSBILITIES (200-250 Words)
|
Board Member |
Responsibilities |
|
1 |
|
|
2 |
|
|
3 |
|
The PMI Practice Guide on the Governance of Portfolios, Programs and Projects describes four Governance Domains: Alignment, Risk, Performance, and Communications. Each governance domain has the following four Governance Functions: Oversight, Control, Integration, and Decision-making.
Based on the provided infrastructure project, please discuss any two of the above functions of your choice within one of the governance domains based on how these functions were handled and how they could have been done differently to avoid the problems encountered during the life of the project, for example, performance domain: oversight and decision-making functions.
PROJECT GOVERNANCE (200-250 WORDS)
|
How were these functions handled by the project board? |
What could have been done differently to avoid/mitigate the problems encountered? |
|
|
Function 1 |
||
|
Function 1 |
||
DESCRIBE TWO GOVERNANCE FAILURES AND REASONS YOU IDENTIFIED FROM THE CASE STUDY RESOURCES PUBLICLY AVAILABLE (200-250 WORDS)
|
No. |
Failure |
Reasons |
|
1 |
||
|
2 |
||
DESCRIBE TWO LESSONS LEARNT FROM THE GOVERNANCE FAILURES BY THE PROJECT GOVERNANCE BOARD OR BY THEIR ORGANISATION (150-200 WORDS)
|
No. |
Failure |
Lessons Learnt |
|
1 |
||
|
2 |
Conclusion
Write the overall findings of the case study project and recommend the industry professionals for a better outcome of similar future projects.
References:
There should be 5 to 10 most relevant references along with in-text citations.
Please Note:
An audit report has been provided on Assessment 2 section on PPMP 20010 Moodle. You do your own research finding more detailed but necessary information.