Unit Code and Name HOTL5007 – Professional Industry DevelopmentSample Page
Assessment brief
| Assessment name | Assessment 1 – Port Folio Task 1 |
| Due date | Week 2 | Friday, 14th July 11.59 PM |
| Assessment mode | Individual |
| Length | 500 words |
| Weighting | 20% |
| Unit learning outcomes |
1 and 2 |
Rationale
The purpose of this assessment is to demonstrate your understanding and application of the career development theories and career development models.
Task Description
This assessment requires you to consider your current view of your career, apply your understanding of career management theories and use a career
development model.
1. Provide a brief overview of your work experience to date.
2. Thinking ahead to your future career, choose one career development theory (from module 1-Trait/Lifespan/TWA/Social Cognitive Theory/Theory of Career
Choice/Chaos Theory of career) will you be applying to your career. Apply the theory to your career.
3. Reflect on your personal career situation using one of the career development models (from module 2 – DOTS or Career Flow Model). Apply the model to your
career.
Make sure you use topic headings (Work experience, career development theory, career development models) in your discussions.
You can write in first personal
Use a minimum of 3-5 references (a combination of academic and industry)
Task instructions
Submit via Turnitin
Referencing and in text citations should be as per the SCU Harvard format.
Marking criteria
Overview of work experience – 4 marks
Reflection of current career using career development model – 6 marks
Application of career development theories – 7 marks
Clarity of expression & Referencing – 3 marks
Important note: In order to achieve a passing grade in this unit you must submit all assessment tasks and obtain a score of at least 50% of the total assessment
marks for the unit.
GenAI May Not be Used
Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) tools, such as ChatGPT, may not be used for this Assessment Task. You are required to demonstrate if you have
developed the unit’s skills and knowledge without the support of GenAI. If you use GenAI tools in your assessment task, it may result in an academic integrity
breach against you as described in the Student Academic and Non-Academic Misconduct Rules, Section 3.
Marking Rubric
| Criteria | High Distncton | Distncton | Credit | Pass | Fail |
| Overview of work experience 4 marks |
Provides excellent overview of current work experience. Positons held and skills atained have been very clearly artculated. |
Provides a very good overview of current work experience. Positons held and skills atained have been very clearly artculated. |
Provides a good overview of current work experience. Positons held and skills atained have been clearly artculated. |
Provides a vague overview of current work experience. Positons held and skills atained are not are vaguely described. |
Work experience overview is missing or is poorly developed, and does not clearly indicate previous positons and/or skills. |
| Reflecton of current career using career development model 6 marks |
Excellent applicaton of one career development model in discussing current career situaton. |
Very good applicaton of one career development model in discussing current career situaton. |
Good applicaton of one career development model in discussing current career situaton |
Career development model is vaguely applied to current career situaton. |
Career development model is incorrectly applied or is missing. |
| Applicaton of career development theories 7 marks |
Excellent applicaton of at least one career development theories to support personal career development. |
Very good applicaton of at least one career development theories to support personal career development. |
Good discussion of personal career development with applicaton to one career development theories. |
Discusses personal career development with applicaton to one career development theory. Discussion is vaguely linked to personal career optons |
Career development theory is incorrectly applied or is missing |
| Clarity of expression & Referencing 3 marks |
Clear, coherent writng style. Well-structured and easy to follow. Outstanding atenton to spelling, punctuaton and grammar. In text referencing and reference list adhere to SCU Harvard format with no errors. |
Clear, coherent style with a very good structure. Comprehensive atenton to spelling, punctuaton and grammar. Only a very few errors. In text referencing and reference adhere to SCU Harvard format with few errors |
Good style with a reasonable structure Competent atenton to spelling, punctuaton and grammar. A few grammatcal errors In text referencing and reference list are competently done according to SCU Harvard format with minor errors. |
Fairly well writen however needed more atenton to spelling, punctuaton and grammar. Grammatcal errors. In text referencing and reference list adhere to SCU Harvard format adequately but lack atenton to detail |
Poor style. Disordered. Ungrammatcal writng Confused structure. Litle atenton to spelling and punctuaton. Errors in referencing. In text referencing and reference list are incomplete/contain errors. Does not use SCU Harvard format. |
Tags: academicwriting, assignment, assignmentday, assignmentdue, assignmenthelp, assignmenthelper, assignmenthelpers, assignments, assignmentsdue, assignmentssuck, assignmentstress, assignmenttime, assignmentwriting, college, dissertation, essay, essayhelp, essaywriting, essaywritingservice, homework, homeworkhelp, researchpaper, student, studentlife, students, thesis, thesiswriting, university, universityassignment, writing