Organizational Behaviour

138 views 10:15 am 0 Comments April 21, 2023

1
Individual Assessment
Cover page

Unit
Details
Name Organizational Behaviour
Code HC1052
Year, Trimester 2023, Trimester 1

 

Assessment
Details
Name Individual assessment
Due Date and Week 5th / May/ 2023, Week 7

 

Individual
Student
Details
Student Number
First Name
Family Name

 

Submission
Declaration
Integrity Declaration I have read and understand academic integrity policies
and practices and my assessment does not violate these.
Full Name
Submission Date

2
Instructions

Academic
Integrity
Information
Holmes Institute is committed to ensuring and upholding academic integrity. All
assessment must comply with academic integrity guidelines. Important academic
integrity breaches include plagiarism, collusion, copying, impersonation, contract
cheating, data fabrication and falsification. Please learn about academic integrity
and consult your teachers with any questions. Violating academic integrity is
serious and punishable by penalties that range from deduction of marks, failure of
the assessment task or unit involved, suspension of course enrolment, or
cancellation of course enrolment.
Format
Instructions
Most assessments must be in MS Word format with no spacing, 11-pt Calibri
font and at least 2cm margins on all four sides with appropriate section
headings and page numbers.
You must name your file with the Unit Code and Student ID (e.g. “HC1052-
GWA1995”).
Check that you submit the correct document as special consideration is not
granted if you make a mistake.
Student ID needs to be indicated on the cover page.
Penalties All work must be submitted on Blackboard by the due date and time along
with a completed Assessment Cover Page. Late penalties apply.
Reference sources must be cited in the text of the report, and listed
appropriately at the end in a reference list using Holmes Institute Adapted
Harvard Referencing. Penalties are associated with incorrect citation and
referencing.

Essay Topic/Scenario
Imagine that you are a manager in a fast food restaurant located near a busy train station in the city.
You also know that there are many similar restaurants in your city, making it a competitive business.
You recognise that providing high quality, quick and friendly service and having actively engaged
employees is going to make the difference between your restaurant’s success and failure. Your
management team decides to first address employee job satisfaction as a key driver of high-quality
customer service.
Task Requirements
First step, based on your knowledge of OB, think about what your restaurant can do to promote job
satisfaction of your employees. Your management team next decides that it will be important to address
the causes of job dissatisfaction among employees if the restaurant is to succeed.
Second step, identify and discuss any five major outcomes of job dissatisfaction.
Third step, think about what your restaurant can do to minimise the occurrence of destructive employee
responses to dissatisfaction.
Fourth step, identify your top three suggestions/recommendations for the restaurant to succeed.
3
Fifth step, find a minimum of five (5) peer-reviewed academic articles from Google Scholar and
ProQuest research database which provide evidence/support the main ideas you have determined from
your reading.
Note: students who cite relevant peer-reviewed academic articles in the ‘Adaptive Harvard
Referencing’ requirements may achieve higher marks than those who do not cite relevant materials in
the required referencing requirements. If you’re in doubt about what is a peer-reviewed academic article
please ask your tutor in the interactive tutorial sessions or the unit coordinator in the drop-in sessions.
Write your Response/Comprehension
Write an introduction (describe the purpose of the essay and the main points you will be
covering).
Compose 3-4 body paragraphs (minimum 300 words each).
Write a conclusion.
The document must be typed in MS Word using an appropriate font (e.g. Times New Roman,
Helvetica, Cambria or Arial (size 12 pt, 1.5 line spacing and left aligned).
Students are advised to read a wide range of scholarly materials in addition to the lecture slides.
What goes in an introduction?
This paragraph introduces the purpose of your analytical essay. Within the introductory paragraph, you
will need to introduce the topic of your essay and highlight the key topics you will address in subsequent
paragraphs of this essay.
How do I write body paragraphs?
Each paragraph has one main point or topic. A good paragraph needs a clear topic sentence to state
the purpose of this paragraph. Then you will write 3-4 statements elaborating on that point using
citations (in-text references) to attribute ideas to journal articles you read.
Your analysis should
demonstrate critical thinking based on research, not just your opinion
. Please paraphrase your ideas
from journal articles rather than using quotations.
What goes in a conclusion?
The conclusion is not a restatement of the introduction. Instead, it must briefly summarise the key points
in the body paragraphs and leave the reader with a clear message(s).
What about references?
Your list of references do not count towards word limit, but in-text citations do. The referencing
format for both the in-text referencing and reference list is the Adapted Harvard Referencing style.
Please see the Adapted Harvard referencing style on p. 7 and ProQuest login in the additional
resources folder in Blackboard.

4
Marking Criteria

Marking Criteria Weighting
Embark + Clarity 4
Find + Generate 3
Evaluate + Reflect 3
Organise + Manage 3
Analyse + Synthesise 3
Communicate + Apply 4
Total Weight 20%

5
Marking Rubric

Criteria Ratings Pts.
Embark + Clarity
(Addresses the task
requirements)
3.5-4 Pts.
HD
Exceptionally clear
understanding and
ability to address all
task requirements and
with clear purpose.
3 Pts.
D
Strong grasp of
understanding
and ability
to address all task
requirements.
2.5 Pts.
CR
Competent understanding
and ability to address all
task requirements.
2 Pts.
PA
Some understanding of the
task evident but some
requirements are missing.
0-1.9 Pts.
NN
Lack of understanding of the task
requirements and an inability to offer
structured directions from researching.
4
Find + Generate 3 Pts.
HD
2.5 Pts
D
2 Pts.
CR
1.5 Pts.
PA
0-1.4 Pts.
NN
3
(Evidence of research +
Harvard referencing format) Uses refined academic
research skills to
locate current, credible,
accurate and
authoritative
data/information. Uses
Harvard referencing
style and in-text
citations with no errors.
Uses academic research
skills to locate current,
credible and authoritative
data/information. Uses
Harvard referencing style
and in-text citations with
minimal errors.
Uses academic research
skills to locate
current and credible
data/information.
Uses Harvard referencing
style and in-text citations,
with some consistent
errors.
Uses general academic
research skills to
locate current
data/information.
Inconsistently applies
Harvard referencing style.
In-text citations and
reference list show
multiple errors.
Does not locate and report data/information
from a number of sources across a specified
range. The articles sourced do not meet the
academic standard required or are not cited
or do not have a clear
application to the task.
Evaluate + Reflect 3 Pts.
HD
2.5 Pts.
D
2 Pts
CR
1.5 Pts.
PA
0-1.4 Pts.
NN
3
(Articles meet task criteria, is
current, relevant, accurate
and peer-reviewed)
Articles selected relate
strongly to the
purpose of the task,
and meet the
academic standard
required. Strongly
support reflection on
the essay topic.
Articles selected relate to
the purpose of the task,
and meet the academic
standard required. Support
reflection on the essay
topic.
Articles selected generally
relate to the purpose of
the task and meet the
academic standard
required. Support some
reflection on the essay
topic.
Articles selected generally
relate to the purpose of
the task. The articles may
not fully
meet the academic
standard required.
Minimal reflection on the
essay topic.
Student has not made connections to the
essay topic. Unable to demonstrate
satisfactory
original reflection on the essay topic.
Organise + Manage 3 Pts.
HD
2.5 Pts.
D
2 Pts.
CR
1.5 Pts.
PA
0-1.4 Pts.
NN
3
(Logical structure of
information) Main ideas clearly
outlined. Discussion and
analysis organised
logically. Cohesive
structure- consistently
encourages reader
Main ideas clearly outlined.
Discussion and analysis
organised logically.
Cohesive structure –
supports reader
engagement
Main ideas clearly outlined.
Information
organised mostly logically.
Generally
Main ideas outlined but
require more
description or explanation.
Some logical
order in the structure but
there is limited
Main ideas not clearly defined. Information
randomly presented. No sense of cohesion
between ideas. Inappropriate structure and
organisation and information not always
coherent nor integrated.

6

engagement with the
content.
with the content. cohesive structure aids
reader understanding of
ideas.
linking between ideas and
information
presented.
Analyse + Synthesise
(
Critical analysis and synthesis
of ideas to produce
understanding
)
3 Pts.
HD
Analysis, critical
personal reflection and
evaluation are fully
integrated effectively to
a high standard of
performance.
2.5 Pts.
D
Analysis and personal
reflection are quite well
integrated.
2 Pts.
CR
Some analysis and
attempts at personal
reflection. Attempts to
synthesise ideas to
discuss/analyse the essay
topic.
1.5 Pts.
PA
Minimal analysis and
personal reflection.
Some attempts to
discuss/analyse the essay
topic. Limited integration
or synthesis
to show understanding of
the essay topic.
0-1.4 Pts.
NN
Alignment of the key idea with the essay topic
and main ideas not outlined clearly. Limited
understanding of the essay topic.
3
Communicate + Apply 3.5-4 Pts.
HD
Uses discipline specific
language to
demonstrate
understanding from an
academic/professional
and personal
perspective. Writing is
fluent and uses
appropriate
paragraph/sentence
structures.
3 Pts.
D
Includes discipline specific
language. Generally
demonstrates
understanding from an
academic/professional and
personal perspective.
Some interpretation and
application of new
knowledge to similar
contexts. Writing is
generally fluent and uses
mostly appropriate
paragraph/sentence
structures.
2.5 Pts.
CR
Some discipline specific
language. Attempts to
demonstrate
understanding from both
academic/professional and
personal perspectives.
Attempted interpretation
and application of new
knowledge. Writing is
generally understandable
and uses mostly
appropriate
paragraph/sentence
structures.
2 Pts.
PA
Limited vocabulary with
little use of discipline
specific language.
Demonstrates
understanding from one
perspective. Minimal
interpretation or
application of new
knowledge. Errors are
frequent, often making
understanding difficult.
0-1.9 Pts.
NN
Mostly general vocabulary with an inability to
use discipline-specific and academic
language. Unable to act as an independent
critical thinker. Unsatisfactory attempt to
discuss the essay topic. Inability to
demonstrate the originality of the solution.
4

7
Holmes Referencing Requirements:
Assessment Design – Adapted Harvard Referencing
Holmes will be implementing as a pilot program a revised Harvard approach to referencing. The following guidelines apply:
1. Reference sources in assignments are limited to sources which provide full text access to the source’s content for lecturers and markers.
2. The Reference list should be located on a separate page at the end of the essay and titled: References.
3. It should include the details of all the in-text citations, arranged alphabetically A-Z by author surname. In addition, it MUST include a hyperlink to
the
full text of the cited reference source.
For example;
Hawking, P., McCarthy, B. and Stein, A. (2004), Second Wave ERP Education,
Journal of Information Systems Education, Fall,
http://jise.org/Volume15/n3/JISEv15n3p327.pdf
4. All assignments will require additional in-text reference details which will consist of the surname of the author/authors or name of the authoring
body, year of publication, page number of content, paragraph where the content can be found.
For example;
“The company decided to implement a enterprise wide data warehouse business intelligence strategies (Hawking et al, 2004, p3(4)).”
Non Adherence to Referencing Guidelines
Where students do not follow the above guidelines:
1. Students who submit assignments which do not comply with the guidelines will be asked to
resubmit their assignments.
2. Late penalties will apply, as per the Student Handbook each day, after the student/s have been
notified of the resubmission requirements.
3. Students who comply with guidelines and the citations are “fake” will be reported for
academic misconduct.