Network Project Management

144 views 7:53 am 0 Comments September 4, 2023

Prepared by: Dr Anies Hannawati Moderated by: Prof Paul Kwan July, 2023

Assessment Details and Submission Guidelines
Unit Code MN601
Unit Title Network Project Management
Term, Year T2, 2023
Assessment Type Formative Assignment 1, Individual
Assessment Title Case Study Formative Assignment
Purpose of the
assessment (with
ULO Mapping)		 The purpose of this assignment is to build a clear understanding of project
management fundamentals and their application, specifically:
a. apply project management skills as a strategic tool, framework, or methodology
for business development.
Weight 10 % of the total assessment
Total Marks 35
Word limit Minimum 700 words
Due Date Week 3, Sunday, 6th August 2023, 23:59 PM
Submission
Guidelines		 • All work must be submitted on Moodle by the due date.
• The assignment must be in MS Word format, 1.5 spacing, 11-pt Calibri (Body) font,
and 2 cm margins on all four sides of your page with appropriate section headings.
• Reference sources must be cited in the text of the report and listed appropriately
at the end in a reference list using IEEE referencing style.
• Students must ensure before submission of the final version of the assignment that
the similarity percentage as computed by Turnitin must be less than 10%.
Assignments with more than 10% similarity may not be considered for marking.
Extension If an extension of time to submit work is required, a Special Consideration Application
must be submitted directly on AMS. You must submit this application three working
days prior to the due date of the assignment. Further information is available at:
https://www.mit.edu.au/about-us/governance/institute-rules-policies-and
plans/policies-procedures-and-guidelines/assessment-policy.
Academic
Misconduct		 Academic Misconduct is a serious offense. Depending on the seriousness of the case,
penalties can vary from a written warning or zero marks to exclusion from the course
or rescinding the degree. Students should make themselves familiar with the full policy
and procedure available at:
https://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies-procedures-and
guidelines/AcademicIntegrityPolicyAndProcedure.
For further information, please refer to the Academic Integrity Section in your Unit
Description.

2023 T2 MN601 Network Project Management Page 2 of 4
Prepared by: Dr Anies Hannawati Moderated by: Prof Paul Kwan July, 2023
ASSIGNMENT CASE STUDY
Case Study: Kaiser Permanente – Adopting SAFe to Build the Future of Healthcare
Acknowledgment:
K. Powelson and S. Archer, “Kaiser Permanente – Adopting SAFe to Build the Future of Healthcare:
Reimagined Technology and Clinical Workflows Transform Home Care for Members”, 2021 Global SAFe
Summit, October 2021 [Online]. Available: https://scaledagile.com/videos/kaiser-permanente-buildsthe-future-of-healthcare-with-safe/. [Accessed: July 01, 2023].
For this trimester, the subject of Network Project Management in both assignments 1 and 2 will center around
the healthcare industry with a focus on automation, networking, IoT, or ICT. Consequently, it is advisable to
commence by studying an illustrative project in this field, which can be accessed via the provided video link.
The aim of this assignment is to understand the stakeholder involved and examine the tangible
implementations of SAFe (Scale Agile Framework) within real-world industries, specifically in the IT healthcare
sector.
In the given video, Agile coach Steven Archer and IT leader Kari Powelson share their insights on implementing
the SAFe in the healthcare industry, particularly in the aged care sector. They will elaborate on the
collaborative efforts of their care delivery technology services and clinical operations development teams to
create innovative software and workflows. Their ultimate goal was to showcase that Kaiser Permanente’s careat-home initiative symbolises the future of healthcare, delivering a positive experience for both members and
clinicians.
ASSIGNMENT DESCRIPTION
To begin this assignment, you are required to watch the video from the provided link. After watching the video,
you will need to provide an executive summary, as well as answer the given questions. To structure your report
effectively, please use the subheadings provided. In order to complete this assignment, you will also need to
conduct additional research and include at least three sources from a combination of journals, conference
papers, websites, or other reliable sources to support your analysis. It is important to ensure that all sources
are published or updated within the last five years (2018-2023) to ensure they are relevant and up-to-date.
Task 1 Executive Summary [10 marks]
To complete this task, you must provide an executive summary that is clear, concise, and effectively highlights
important points, problems, solutions, findings, and conclusions. The purpose of an executive summary is to
provide readers with a comprehensive overview of the presented topics and offer a high-level understanding
of the subject matter.
Task 2 Stakeholder Analysis [10 marks]
In this task, your goal is to identify and conduct a stakeholder analysis. By conducting a comprehensive analysis
of the stakeholders involved, you will gain valuable insights into the project’s scope and the most effective
ways to engage with each stakeholder throughout the project lifecycle. It is crucial to consider the unique
perspectives and interests of each stakeholder, as well as their potential influence on the project’s overall
success or failure. Through this analysis, you will be able to develop strategies to manage stakeholder
expectations, address potential conflicts, and ultimately ensure a successful outcome for the project.
Task 3 Scaled Agile Framework [10 marks]
Looking back at the video, what were the key benefits and advantages of implementing SAFe in this project?
Additionally, identify and discuss another real-world project that has successfully applied agile methodology
in the areas of automation, networking, IoT, or ICT. How has this methodology contributed to enhancing
project agility and efficiency in that specific project?
2023 T2 MN601 Network Project Management Page 3 of 4
Prepared by: Dr Anies Hannawati Moderated by: Prof Paul Kwan July, 2023
MARKING CRITERIA

Questions Description Marks
Task 1
Executive Summary		 • An executive summary has been prepared, which highlights the
key points, problems, solutions, findings, and conclusions of the
project.		 10
Task 2
Stakeholder Analysis		 • Identify stakeholders and provide a justification for their
inclusion.
• Create a stakeholder analysis matrix to assess their level of
interest, influence, and potential impact on the project.		 5 5
Task 3
Scaled Agile Framework		 • Explain the key benefits and advantages of implementing SAFe
for the project.
• Provide an example of another real-world project that has
successfully utilised agile methodology, and explain the benefits
and advantages that this methodology has brought to the project		 5 5
Reference Style and
Presentation		 • Follow IEEE reference style and should have both in-text citations
and reference list. Use at least 3 resources for the assignment.
• Nice presentation of the report including format report, spelling
and grammar.		 2.5
2.5
Total 35

2023 T2 MN601 Network Project Management Page 4 of 4
Prepared by: Dr Anies Hannawati Moderated by: Prof Paul Kwan July, 2023
MARKING RUBRIC

Grades >=80% 70%-79% 60% – 69% 50% – 59% <50%
Task 1
Executive
Summary		 The executive
summary is
very well
written with a
very clear
background on
the case study.		 The executive
summary is
well written
with a clear
background on
the case study.		 The executive
summary is
generally
presented in
good fashion,
however,
missing a few
details.		 A poor
executive
summary with
some irrelevant
details.		 A very poor
executive
summary.
Task 2
Stakeholder
Analysis		 Excellent
analysis of
stakeholders
and covered in
depth.
Demonstrated
the ability to
think critically
and make good
use of the
source
materials.		 Very clear
analysis of
stakeholders
from the case
study and
provided very
good
justification.		 Generally good
analysis of
stakeholders
from the case
study and
provided
reasonable
details on
justification.		 Poor analysis of
stakeholders,
only provides
generic details
on the topic,
and no
justification is
provided.		 Very poor
discussion with
irrelevant
information
Task 3
Scaled Agile
Framework		 Comprehensive
explanation,
well
researched
example,
thorough
analysis with
clear evidence
and examples.		 Clear
explanation,
relevant
example,
reasonable
analysis with
some evidence
and examples.		 Basic
explanation,
limited analysis,
and the
example may
lack relevance
or depth.		 Limited or
incomplete
explanation,
limited analysis,
insufficient
supporting
evidence.		 Unclear
explanation,
irrelevant or
missing
example, little
to no analysis
or evidence
provided.
Reference
Style and
Presentation		 Clear styles
with an
excellent
source of
references.
The report is
presented
professionally.		 Clear
referencing
style.
The report is
written
properly with
some minor
mistakes.		 Generally good
referencing
style.
The report is
mostly good,
but some
structure or
presentation
problems.		 Unclear
referencing
style.
The report is
presented
acceptably.		 Lacks
consistency
with many
errors.
The report is
presented
carelessly with
poor structure.

 

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,