Marking Rubric

134 views 9:03 am 0 Comments May 26, 2023

HLTH101 Assessment 3 – Marking Rubric v2022-23
You will be assessed on your ability to clearly, concisely and accurately:

Marking Criteria Fail (0-9) Pass (10-12) Credit (13-14) Distinction (15-16) High Distinction (17-20) Mark
Discuss key ideas from relevant
modules in your two forum
posts (20 marks).		 Inadequate or missing
post or posts;
inadequate discussion in
one or both posts.		 Basic discussion in
both posts; mostly
descriptive with little
or no analysis.		 Sound discussion in both
posts; mostly descriptive
with some analysis
and/or use of examples.		 Detailed, succinct
discussion in both posts;
strong analysis and/or use
of examples.		 Comprehensive, succinct
discussion in both posts; strong
analysis well linked to
examples.		 /20
Marking Criteria Fail (0-14) Pass (15-19) Credit (20-22) Distinction (23-25) High Distinction (26-30) Mark
Expand on your forum posts to
apply learning from this unit to
your chosen health or social
care practice (30 marks).		 Inadequate expansion on
one or both posts;
learning poorly or not
applied to professional
development.		 Basic expansion on
both posts; basic
application of
learning to
professional
development.		 Sound expansion on both
posts; sound application
of learning to
professional
development, with some
analysis and examples		 Detailed expansion on both
posts; sound application of
learning to professional
development, good analysis
that is well linked to
examples		 Comprehensive expansion on
both posts; sound application
of learning to professional
development with critical
analysis that is very well linked
to examples		 /30
Marking Criteria Fail (0-9) Pass (10-12) Credit (13-14) Distinction (15-16) High Distinction (17-20) Mark
Locate, analyse and apply
relevant literature to support
your writing (30 marks).		 Little or no evidence of
effective research;
sources inadequate
and/or inappropriate;
poor description, and/or
poor or no analysis.		 Basic evidence of
research; most
sources adequate and
appropriate;
narrative which is
mostly descriptive
with little or no
analysis		 Sound evidence of
research; adequate and
appropriate sources;
some analysis and use of
examples.		 Evidence of thorough
research; good breadth and
depth of sources; analysis
with good use of examples.		 Evidence of comprehensive
research; high-level breadth
and depth of sources; detailed
and insightful analysis well
linked to examples. 		/30
Marking Criteria Fail (0-9) Pass (10-12) Credit (13-14) Distinction (15-16) High Distinction (17-20) Mark
Present the findings in essay
format. Use academic tone and
language, and APA 7th edition
referencing style including in
text citations and References
list (20 marks).		 Poor adherence to
required presentation;
academic tone and
language absent or
inconsistent; little or no
referencing and/or poor
adherence to APA
7th edition formatting for
in-text citations and/or
References list; little or
no evidence of
researching.		 Basic presentation;
academic tone and
language mostly
used; some
adherence to APA
7th edition formatting
for in-text citations
and/or References
list; evidence of basic
researching.		 Good presentation;
academic tone and
language used;
adherence to APA
7th edition formatting for
in-text citations and
References list with few
inconsistencies; some
evidence of wider
researching.		 Very good presentation;
consistent academic tone
and language; adherence to
APA 7th edition formatting
for in-text citations and
References list with very
few, minor inconsistencies;
evidence of wider
researching throughout..		 Professional standard of
presentation; academic tone
and language used to high
level; strict adherence to APA
7th edition formatting for in
text citations and References
list; strong evidence of wider
researching throughout.		 /20

Marked by Date TOTAL /100