Marking Rubric - Australia Assignments

1
MGMT20130 T2 2019: Assessment 2 Marking Rubric

Report marking criteria (40%)	0 (Not Shown)	1 (Poor)	2 (Unsatisfactory)	3 (Satisfactory)	4 (Good)	5 (Very Good)	6 (Excellent)
1. Demonstrated understanding	Non-existent or entirely	Poor discussion of	Unsatisfactory discussion of	Satisfactory discussion of	Good discussion of	Very good discussion of	Excellent discussion of
of OM frameworks that are	irrelevant or	OM frameworks and	OM frameworks and	OM frameworks and	OM frameworks and	OM frameworks and	OM frameworks and
Related to the question posed	incomprehensible.	problems.	problems.	problems.	problems.	problems	Problems.
(15%)
2. Accurately explain the latest trends in OM and make the	Non-existent or entirely	Poor discussion of	Unsatisfactory discussion of	Satisfactory discussion of	Good discussion of	Very good discussion of	Excellent discussion of
Linkage between practical	irrelevant or	the latest trends in OM and	the latest trends in OM and	the latest trends in OM and	the latest trends in OM and	the latest trends in OM and	the latest trends in OM and
and theoretical aspects (15%)	incomprehensible.	practical and/or theoretical	practical and/or theoretical	practical and/or theoretical	practical and/or theoretical	practical and/or theoretical	practical and/or theoretical
aspects	aspects.	aspects	aspects.	aspects.	aspects.
3. Accurately suggest and develop the model for detailed	Non-existent or entirely irrelevant or	Poor suggestion of the developed model for detailed	Unsatisfactory suggestion of the developed model for	Satisfactory suggestion of the developed model for	Good suggestion of the developed model for	Very good suggestion of the developed model for	Excellent suggestion of the developed model for
Analysis in relation to the Case application	Incomprehensible.	analysis in relation to the case application	detailed analysis in relation to the case application	detailed analysis in relation to the case application	detailed analysis in relation to the case application	detailed analysis in relation to the case application	detailed analysis in relation to the case application
(10%)
4. Able to articulate and evaluation scenario modeling to provide insights and limitations based on quantitative outcome (10%)	Non-existent or entirely irrelevant or incomprehensible	Poor level – modelling scenario evaluation to provide insights and limitations based on quantitative outcome	Unsatisfactory level – modelling scenario evaluation to provide insights and limitations based on quantitative outcome	Satisfactory level – modelling scenario evaluation to provide insights and limitations based on quantitative outcome	Good level – modelling scenario evaluation to provide insights and limitations based on quantitative outcome	High level – modelling scenario evaluation to provide insights and limitations based on quantitative outcome	Excellent level – modelling scenario evaluation to provide insights and limitations based on quantitative outcome
5. Provide appropriate and	Non-existent or entirely	Poor level –	Unsatisfactory level –	Satisfactory level –	Good level –	High level –	Excellent level –
Well-structured, concise and	irrelevant or	OM arguments in terms of	OM arguments in terms of	OM arguments in terms of	OM arguments in terms of	OM arguments in terms of	OM arguments in terms of
Clear expression of OM	incomprehensible.	theoretical and practical	theoretical and practical	theoretical and practical	theoretical and practical	theoretical and practical	theoretical and practical
arguments in terms of	elements	elements	elements	elements	elements	elements
Theoretical and practical elements (15%)
6. Provide a clear flow of	Non-existent or entirely	Poor level –	Unsatisfactory level –	Satisfactory level –	Good level –	High level –	Excellent level –
thought throughout the	irrelevant or	provide a clear flow thought	provide a clear flow thought	provide a clear flow thought	provide a clear flow thought	provide a clear flow thought	provide a clear flow thought
Business report, evidenced by succinct summary, intro, conclusion (15%)	incomprehensible.	throughout the report	throughout the report	throughout the report	throughout the report	throughout the report	throughout the report

7. Critical evaluation and Integration of relevant academic and literature to provide theoretical and practical aspects. Insights from a minimum of 15 academic journal articles must be incorporated in your critical analysis (10%)	Non-existent or entirely irrelevant or incomprehensible.	Poor level – evaluation and Integration of relevant academic and literature to provide theoretical and practical aspects.	Unsatisfactory level – evaluation and Integration of relevant academic and literature to provide theoretical and practical aspects.	Satisfactory level – evaluation and integration of relevant academic and literature to provide theoretical and practical aspects.	Good level – evaluation and Integration of relevant academic and literature to provide theoretical and practical aspects.	High level – evaluation and integration of relevant academic and literature to provide theoretical and practical aspects.	Excellent level – evaluation and integration of relevant academic and literature to provide theoretical and practical aspects.
8. Adherence to APA reference format (5%)	Non-existent or entirely incomprehensible.	Limited adherence	Adherence (unsatisfactory)	Adherence (Satisfactory)	Adherence (Good)	Adherence (Very Good)	Adherence (Excellent)
9. Clarity of written expression, grammar, spelling (5%)	Non-existent or entirely incomprehensible.	Limited clarity of written expression, grammar, spelling	clarity of written expression, grammar, spelling (Unsatisfactory)	clarity of written expression, grammar, spelling (Satisfactory)	clarity of written expression, grammar, spelling (Good)	clarity of written expression, grammar, spelling (Very Good)	clarity of written expression, grammar, spelling (Excellent)