APIC
Marking Criteria and Rubric: The assessment will be marked out of 100 and will be weighted 40% of the total unit mark
Marking Criteria Not satisfactory (0-49%) of the criterion snack) Satisfactory (50-64%) of the criterion mark Good (65-74%) of the criterion mark Very Good (75-84%) of the criterion mark Excellent (85-100%) of the criterion mark Create an organization chart for Golden Training Company ( 5 marks) Poorly illustration of the organization chart. Brief illustration of the organization chart. Good illustration of the organization chart. Well illustration of the organization chart. Excellent illustration of the organization chart. Systems Development Life Cycle (SDLC) (5 marks) Poorly discussion of the six core processes of the SDLC required developing the project. Brief discussion of the six core processes of the SDLC required developing the project. Good discussion of the six core processes of the SDLC required developing the project. Well discussion of the six core processes of the SDLC required developing the project. Excellent discussion of the six core processes of the SDLC required developing the project. Project manager responsibilities (5 marks) Poorly discussion of the Project manager responsibilities Brief discussion of the Project manager responsibilities Good discussion of the Project manager responsibilities Well discussion of the Project manager responsibilities Excellent discussion of Project manager responsibilities System Vision Document (5 marks) Poorly discussion of the System Vision Document Brief discussion of the System Vision Document Good discussion of the System Vision Document Well discussion of the System Vision Document Excellent discussion of the System Vision Document Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) (5 mark) Poor description with no poor table for the project to include the ID, description, and duration for each task. Brief description with brief table for the project to include the ID, description, and duration for each task. Generally good description with good supported table for the project to explain the ID, description, and duration for each task. Very clear description with good supported table for the project to explain the ID, description, and duration for each task. Very good description with very good supported table for the project to explain the ID, description, and duration for each task. PERT/CPM chart (5 mark) Lack of evidence of understanding of PERT/CPM chart with no identification of critical path and the total time to finish the project, Evidence of basic understanding of PERT/CPM chart with no clear identification of critical path and the total time to finish the project, Evidence of good understanding and identification of PERT/CPM chart with clear identification of critical path and the total time to finish the project. Very clear understanding and identification of PERT/CPM chart with clear identification of critical path and the total time to finish the project. Has excellent understanding and identification of PERT/CPM chart with clear identification of critical path and the total time to finish the project. Activity diagram (5 mark) Poor identification and description of activity diagram Brief identification and description of activity diagram Generally good identification and description of activity diagram Very clear description identification and description of activity diagram Excellent identification and description of activity diagram Use Case diagram (5 mark) Lack of evidence of understanding of use case diagram Evidence of basic understanding of use case diagram Evidence of good understanding of use case diagram Very clear understanding of use case diagram Has excellent understanding of use case diagram Class Diagram (10 mark) Lack of evidence of understanding of Class Diagram Evidence of basic understanding of Class Diagram Evidence of good understanding and identification of Class Diagram Very clear understanding and identification of Class Diagram Has excellent understanding and identification of Class Diagram Entities, Attributes and ER diagram (5 mark) Poor identification and description of Entities, Attributes and ER diagram Brief identification and description of Entities, Attributes and ER diagram Generally good identification and description of Entities, Attributes and ER diagram Very clear description identification and description of Entities, Attributes and ER diagram Excellent identification and description of Entities, Attributes and ER diagram Use Case description (10 marks) Poorly discussion of the use case description Brief discussion of the use case description Good discussion of the use case description Well discussion of the use case description Excellent discussion of the use case description Sequence diagram (10 mark) Poor identification and description of Sequence Brief identification and description of Generally good identification and Very clear description identification and Excellent identification and description of
Asia Pacific International College Pty Ltd. Trading as Asia Pacific International College PRV12007; CRICOS 03048D Approved: 2/10/2020