Marking criteria - Australia Assignments

HRMT20025 ASSESSMENT ITEM 3 – INDIVIDUAL REPORT – MARKING RUBRIC
Note: This is an illustration of the marking criteria that will be used in Turnitin Feedback Studio. To see your marks on the criteria, open your assignment through Feedback Studio and click on the marking criteria
button. You can access this by clicking on the small blue pencil icon next to your assignment submission, and then clicking on the small rubric icon in the Feedback Studio window.
There is no “safe” percentage of similarity when receiving a Turnitin similarity score. It is possible a higher score is the result of a very long reference list, and similarly, it is possible that even a low score still
indicates plagiarism. The main thing to look out for is WHERE the similarity is being shown. If there is a high level of similarity found in the body of the assignment, you will probably lose marks for not
presenting your own ideas. A high level of similarity in the body of your assignment may significantly affect your marks for each of the criteria, as marks are given based on original text and appropriately
referenced text only. It is suggested that you reduce the use of direct quotes from other sources wherever possible. Markers will analyse the similarity score reported by Turnitin on a case-by-case basis.

Criteria	0 (Not Shown)	1 (Poor)	2 (Unsatisfactory)	3 (Satisfactory)	4 (Above Average)	5 (Good)	6 (Excellent)
1. Knowledge Demonstrates awareness and understanding of concepts and theories relevant to the unit throughout the report 20%	Does not demonstrate awareness and understanding of concepts and theories relevant to the unit throughout the report	Demonstrates an inadequate level of awareness and understanding of concepts and theories relevant to the unit throughout the report	Demonstrates an emerging awareness and understanding of concepts and theories relevant to the unit throughout the report	Demonstrates a reasonable level of awareness and understanding of concepts and theories relevant to the unit throughout the report	Demonstrates above average awareness and understanding of concepts and theories relevant to the unit throughout the report	Demonstrates very good awareness and understanding of concepts and theories relevant to the unit throughout the report	Demonstrates exceptional awareness and understanding of concepts and theories relevant to the unit throughout the report
2. Analysis Demonstrates the capacity to critically analyse, synthesise, and apply concepts and theories throughout the report 20%	Does not demonstrate the capacity to critically analyse, synthesise, and apply concepts and theories throughout the report	Limited ability to critically analyse, synthesise, and apply concepts and theories throughout the report	Emerging ability to critically analyse, synthesise, and apply concepts and theories throughout the report	Satisfactorily demonstrates the capacity to critically analyse, synthesise, and apply concepts and theories throughout the report	Demonstrates an above average ability to critically analyse, synthesise, and apply concepts and theories throughout the report	Demonstrates an excellent ability to critically analyse, synthesise, and apply concepts and theories throughout the report	Demonstrates an exceptional ability to critically analyse, synthesise, and apply concepts and theories throughout the report
3. Research Demonstrates the ability to thoroughly investigate an organisation and the IHRM activities it is undertaking. 20%	Does not demonstrate the ability to thoroughly investigate an organisation and the IHRM activities it is undertaking.	Demonstrates inadequate ability to thoroughly investigate an organisation and the IHRM activities it is undertaking.	Demonstrates emerging ability to thoroughly investigate an organisation and the IHRM activities it is undertaking.	Demonstrates sound ability to thoroughly investigate an organisation and the IHRM activities it is undertaking.	Demonstrates above average ability to thoroughly investigate an organisation and the IHRM activities it is undertaking.	Demonstrates well developed ability to thoroughly investigate an organisation and the IHRM activities it is undertaking.	Demonstrates superior ability to thoroughly investigate an organisation and the IHRM activities it is undertaking.
4. Recommendations Provides effective strategies and demonstrates justification for the recommended strategies 20%	Does not provide strategies or does not justify the recommended strategies	Provides ineffective strategies, or demonstrates inadequate justification for the recommended strategies	Provides some strategies, and demonstrates emerging ability to justify the recommended strategies	Provides some effective strategies, and demonstrates reasonable justification for the recommended strategies	Provides effective strategies, and demonstrates above average justification for the recommended strategies	Provides effective strategies, and demonstrates well developed justification for the recommended strategies	Provides effective strategies, and demonstrates superior justification for the recommended strategies
5. Referencing Demonstrates knowledge and application of correct APA style referencing, both in-text and in the reference list 10%	Does not demonstrate knowledge and application of correct APA style referencing, both in-text and in the reference list	Demonstrates ineffective knowledge and application of correct APA style referencing, both in text and in the reference list	Demonstrates emerging knowledge and application of correct APA style referencing, both in-text and in the reference list	Demonstrates reasonable knowledge and application of correct APA style referencing, both in-text and in the reference list	Demonstrates above average knowledge and application of correct APA style referencing, both in-text and in the reference list	Demonstrates well developed knowledge and application of correct APA style referencing, both in text and in the reference list	Demonstrates superior knowledge and application of correct APA style referencing, both in-text and in the reference list
6. Presentation Demonstrates the ability to use appropriate conventions of academic writing 10%	Unacceptable ability to use appropriate conventions of academic writing.	Limited ability to use appropriate conventions of academic writing.	Emerging ability to use appropriate conventions of academic writing.	Satisfactory ability to use appropriate conventions of academic writing.	Proficient ability to use appropriate conventions of academic writing.	Excellent ability to use appropriate conventions of academic writing.	Exceptional ability to use appropriate conventions of academic writing.