MGT5MPT: Individual Reflection Presentation. Marking criteria
latrobe.edu.au
| CRITERIA | A: Excellent (> 80 %) | B: Very good (70 – 79%) | C: Good (60 – 69%) | D: Acceptable (50 – 59%) | N: Unacceptable (<50%) |
| Analyse and apply management approaches and theories (8 marks) |
Excellent and clearly- explained criteria of effectiveness. (6.4-8 marks) |
Very good explanation of the criteria of effectiveness. (5.6-5.9 marks) |
Good explanation of the criteria of effectiveness. (4.8-5.5 marks) |
Fair explanation of the criteria of effectiveness. (4.0-4.7 marks) |
Little or no attempt at explaining of the criteria of effectiveness. (<4 marks) |
| Research and Reflection (8 marks) |
Insightful reflection and discussion of personal position, including well- explained justification for taking this stance, drawing on relevant posts from discussion forums where appropriate. (6.4-8 marks) |
Very good reflection and discussion of personal position, including justification for taking this stance, drawing on discussion forum posts. (5.6-5.9 marks) |
Good discussion of personal position, including some justification for taking this stance, drawing on discussion forum posts. (4.8-5.5 marks)) |
Fair discussion of personal position, but little or no justification for taking this stance, Fails to draw on discussion forum posts. (4.0-4.7 marks) |
Little or no attempt at reflecting on personal position (<4 marks) |
| Structure and organisation (2 marks) |
Sequence and structure are logical and easy to follow; excellent overall organisation. (1.6-2 marks) |
Sequence and structure are logical and easy to follow; good overall organisation. (1.4-1.5 marks) |
Structured well enough to make sense; could be better organised and more tightly focused upon the topic, may lack focus, engagement or summary. (1.2-1.3 marks) |
Mostly coherent organisation; may have some sections where difficult to follow reasoning. Could be more clearly and logically organised. (1-1.1 marks) |
Lacks coherent organisation and structure. Describes disconnected bits of information or many direct quotes. (< 1mark) |
| Presentation and referencing (2 marks) |
Excellent use of relevant and appropriate sources of literature. Correct referencing used throughout. Excellent grammar and spelling. (1.6-2 marks) |
Very good use of relevant and appropriate sources of literature. Correct referencing, and good grammar and spelling. (1.4-1.5 marks) |
Good use of relevant and appropriate sources of literature (1.2-1.3 marks) |
Good use of relevant sources of literature. Mostly correct referencing. Some grammar and spelling errors. (1-1.1 marks) |
Few if any literature sources included and poor referencing. Poor spelling and grammar. (< 1mark) |