HOTL6013 Assessment 1 (worth 25 marks) marking criteria/rubric
|
High Distinction |
Distinction |
Credit |
Pass |
Fail |
|
|
Project criteria |
The project MUST be hospitality-related: if not, this task will not be assessed. Refer to Module 1 – ‘Unit requirements’ section. |
||||
|
Problem details (5 marks) |
Perfectly explained and supported by evidence; focus and scope is sufficiently narrow | Well explained and supported by evidence; focus and scope is narrow | Satisfactorily/Can be better explained and supported by evidence; focus and scope is not satisfactorily or adequately narrowed | Can be better explained and supported by evidence; focus and scope is not satisfactorily narrowed | Not clear and/or supported by evidence; focus and scope is too broad |
| Significance of the study
(5 marks) |
The importance of the problem is expertly articulated; the need for investigation is well established | The importance of the problem is adequately articulated; the need for investigation is established | The importance of the problem can be better articulated; the need for investigation is somewhat convincing | The importance of the problem can be better or is not clearly articulated; the need for investigation is somewhat/not convincing | The importance of the problem is not articulated; the need for investigation is not clear |
|
Project beneficiary (2 marks) |
Project beneficiary is clearly identified; research problem is specifically linked to this project beneficiary | Project beneficiary is identified; research problem is linked to this project beneficiary | Project beneficiary is somewhat identified; research problem is somewhat linked to this project beneficiary | Project beneficiary is not clearly identified; research problem is vaguely linked to this project beneficiary | Project beneficiary is not identified; research problem is not linked to this project beneficiary |
|
Research aim |
Perfectly framed; succinct; linked to the research problem identified earlier; includes the name of the project beneficiary | Correctly framed; somewhat succinct; linked to the research problem identified earlier; includes the name of the project beneficiary | Satisfactorily framed; needs to be more succinct; linked to the research problem identified earlier; does not include the name of the project beneficiary | Satisfactorily framed; needs to be more succinct; vaguely linked to the research problem identified earlier; does not include the name of the project beneficiary | Needs to be rephrased; not succinct; not linked to the research problem identified earlier; does not include the name of the project beneficiary |
|
Research question(s) (4 marks) |
Correct number of questions; expertly framed to achieve the research aim; refers to the same research problem identified earlier; includes the name of the project beneficiary | Correct number of questions; satisfactorily framed to achieve the research aim; refers to the same research problem identified earlier; includes the name of the project beneficiary | Correct number of questions; needs some revision to achieve the research aim; refers to the same research problem identified earlier; does not include the name of the project beneficiary | Too many questions; needs some revision to achieve the research aim; does not refer to the same research problem identified earlier; does not include the name of the project beneficiary | Too many questions; will not help achieve the research aim; does not refer to the same research problem identified earlier; does not include the name of the project beneficiary |
|
Data source(s) (5 marks) |
Mentions the sources (e.g., Tripadvisor) of secondary data; attached screenshots and/or provided weblinks of secondary data; clearly explained how the secondary data relates to the research problem | Mentions the sources (e.g., Tripadvisor) of secondary data; attached screenshots and/or provided weblinks of secondary data; needs a better explanation of how the secondary data relates to the research problem | Mentions the sources (e.g., Tripadvisor) of secondary data; attached screenshots and/or provided weblinks of secondary data; no explanation of how the secondary data relates to the research problem | Mentions the sources (e.g., Tripadvisor) of secondary data; did not attach screenshots and/or weblinks of secondary data; no explanation of how the secondary data relates to the research problem | No details of secondary data provided |
|
OneDrive |
Unit requirement: Project-related all resources and assessments (including those in-progress) MUST be saved in OneDrive folder, and this folder should be shared with your local lecturer. Until this is done, assessment tasks will not be marked. | ||||