Management and Organisational Behaviour

92 views 7:22 am 0 Comments March 13, 2023

Page 1 of 21
School of Hospitality and Tourism Management
BA International Hotel Management
Module Handbook 2022-23:
BMIH5004
Management and Organisational Behaviour
LEVEL 5
Module Lead:
Robyn Griffiths
[email protected]
January 2023
Page 2 of 21
Introduction to Management and Organisational Behaviour 2022-23
Welcome to this generic overview handbook. This is a level 5, 20 credit module taught in semester 1 to
second year BA International Hotel Management students.
It should be read in conjunction with supplementary information and materials available on Moodle and
Microsoft Teams together with information and instructions delivered by the module tutor.
In order to get the best out of this module it is vital that you engage with the themes explored as well as
with both the online and offline activities during tutorial sessions which are designed to enrich the learning
experience as well as to encourage self-directed study together with collaboration and interaction with
your peer group.
AIM(S)
To cultivate student knowledge and understanding of the nature of behaviour within organisations,
through the application of a multi-disciplinary approach to the study of people at work.
To enable students to gain insight into, and comprehend, concepts of organisational design, functions and
processes of management, in addition to recognising the importance of ‘management’ as an integrating
activity.
LEARNING OUTCOMES
Upon the successful completion of this module, the student should be able to:
Coherently and critically analyse the relationship between structure, culture, people and organisational
performance;
Critically understand the essential nature of managerial work (in terms of both functions and processes)
communicate the role of leadership and furthermore, explain the variables that determine effective
management and leadership;
Critically evaluate the behavioural approach to management, through understanding of the factors that
affect differences in individual behaviour.
INDICATIVE CONTENT
Theoretical perspectives on organisation and management with a particular focus on the paradigm shift
from transition, stability, predictability and order towards flexibility, contingency and flux
An assessment of the general principles of organisation design, structure and culture, illustrated through
practical examples and applications.
A focus on managerial behaviour and action, with an analysis of the elements that constitute effective
managerial behaviour. Management accountability.
Theories of leadership, within an emphasis on the pivotal importance of leadership ability within times of
organisational change and transition
An introduction and overview of the behavioural science approach to the management of people within
organisations

Page 3 of 21
Psychological theories and explanatory frameworks of individual behaviour, pertaining to:
o Personality
o Perception
o Learning
o Attitudinal dispositions, namely motivation, satisfaction and commitment
The nature of work groups and teams
Study Time Allocation
The study time for the module is divided as follows:

Activity type Hours Percentage
Scheduled learning 40 24%
Independent learning 160 76%
Placement learning 0 0%
TOTAL 200 100%

ASSESSMENT
Assessment Component 1
(Tick one)

Written exam Coursework Practical

 

Mode of assessment Volume Weighting
Essay 2000 words 50%

Assessment Component 2
(Tick one)

Written exam Coursework Practical

 

Mode of assessment Volume Weighting
Written Report 2000 words 50%

Assessment Summary

Activity type Percentage
Written exam 0%
Coursework 100%
Practical 0%
TOTAL 100%

Page 4 of 21
Scheduled Class Programme
The module will be delivered via Microsoft Teams (specific MOB Team channel) as follows:
Semester delivery
9.30am – 1pm.
The following schedule of classes is indicative only and is subject to change:

Indicative Class Schedule 2022-
23
(subject to modification)
W/c Week LECTURE TOPICS
(associated tutorials will apply and develop each topic)
09/01/2023 1 Module Introduction – Key Themes/Concepts – Approaches to management
16/01/2023 2 Introducing Organisations – The Role of the Manager
23/01/2023 3 Managerial Behaviour & Effectiveness – Introducing Leadership
30/01/2023 4 Working in Groups and Teams 1
Assignment 1 Essay Preparation Advice
06/02/2023 5 Organisation Structure and Design
Appointments available to review drafts/discuss progress
Assignment 1 ESSAY SUBMISSION DATE by Friday 17th Feb 2023
13/02/2023 6 Organisational Culture
20/02/2023 7 Industry Week
No taught sessions: A student conference filled with Industry experts that you can attend, in person at UWTSD in Swansea or virtually,
giving you a great opportunity to ask questions, meet with experts and who knows secure that all important job!
27/02/2023 8 Change Management & Strategic Management Introduced
06/03/2023 9 Content Review
Assignment 2 – Report Preparation Advice
Assignment 2 REPORT SUBMISSION DATE by Friday 10th March 2023

Page 5 of 21
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Essential
Mullins, L & Dosser, P. (2013) Hospitality Management and Organisational Behaviour (5th Ed) Harlow, Pearson.
Mullins, L (2020) Organisational Behaviour in the Workplace (12
th edition) Harlow:Pearson
Mullins, L. (2016) Management and Organisational Behaviour
(11th edition) Harlow: Pearson
Boddy, D. (2014) Management: An Introduction (6
th Ed), Harlow, Pearson
Recommended
Adair, J. (2009) The Inspirational Leader (2nd Ed), London: Kogan Page
Armstrong, M. (2012) Armstrong’s Handbook of Management and Leadership (3
rd Ed), London: Kogan Page.
Arnold, J. (2005) Work Psychology (4
th edition) Harlow: Prentice Hall.
Bloisi, W. et al (2007) Management and Organisational Behaviour
, (2nd edition) Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill.
Buchanan, D. And Huczynski, A. (2007) Organisational Behaviour: An Introductory Text (6
th edition), Harlow: Prentice
Hall.
Huczynski, A. & Buchanan, D. (2013) Organisational Behaviour (8
th Ed), Harlow: Pearson
Robbins, S. Et al (2008) Organizational Behaviour (5
th edition) Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.
Rollinson, D. et al (2008 ) Organisational Behaviour and Analysis
(4th edition) Harlow: Addison-Wesley Longman.
Journals
Human Relations
Human Resource Management Journal
Journal of Organizational Behaviour
Management Today
People Management
Learning Organisation
Organization Studies
Websites
www.bized; www.hrmguide.co.uk; www.bized.co.uk
Page 6 of 21

Student name: Student ID number:
Programme: BA International Hotel Management
Module: Management & Organisational Behaviour
Module code: BMIH5004 Contribution to
Overall Module
Assessment (%):
50%
(1 of 2)
Lecturer: Robyn Griffiths, Lisa Knight Internal Verifier: Huw Thomas
Assignment Title: Mark the Hotel Manager Word count
(or equivalent):
2,000
Submission
deadline:
17h Feb 2023 Return date of
provisional marks
& written feedback:
By no later than
17
th March 2023
Submission
method:
All written assessments, where practical and possible, must be submitted via Turnitin unless
otherwise instructed by the Lecturer. (Please DO NOT put this assessment specification into
Turnitin or it will match many similarities with other students’ submissions.)
Alternative submission method (if applicable):
Late submission of the assessment will result in a late penalty mark.
Penalties for late
submission: Up to one week late, maximum mark of 40%. Over one week late, 0%. Only the
Extenuating Circumstances Panel may approve a change to submission dates.
Academic
honesty /
referencing:
Academic honesty is required. In the main body of your submission you must give credit to
authors on whose research and ideas your work is based. Append to your submission a reference
list that indicates the books, articles, etc. that you have used, cited or quoted in order to complete
this assessment.

 

Module Learning Outcomes
(from module syllabus)
1. To coherently and critically analyse the relationship between structure, culture, people and
organisational performance;
2. To critically understand the essential nature of managerial work (in terms of both functions
and processes) communicate the role of leadership and furthermore, explain the variables
that determine effective management and leadership;
3. To critically evaluate the behavioural approach to management, through understanding of
the factors that affect differences in individual behaviour.

LEVEL 5 ASSESSMENT
SPECIFICATION

Page 7 of 21
Write an essay (2000 words)
1. With reference to the Blake and Mouton Managerial Grid, construct a critical evaluation of
Grosvenor Hotel Torquay General Manager Mark Jenkins in terms of your identification of his
preferred style of management. (1000 words)
2. Using
Adair’s model of Action Centred Leadership (ACL), consider how effective Mark is
within each of the three key functions of managerial leadership. (1000 words)
Use examples from the series to support your analysis.
Please see the following YouTube link for series 2 of Channel 4’s ‘The Hotel’. You need to watch
the series in order to gain the insight required to address the tasks set.
https://youtu.be/JobSkAorjOY – First episode
https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6wsOS97zAe4R_m6X39WCtUnddLR0a-np – FULL SERIES 2
NB – please refer to The Hotel series 2 only.
TASK DESCRIPTION:
Mark, The Hotel Manager

Page 8 of 21
NOTE: The guidance offered below is linked to the five generic assessment criteria given below.
1. Engagement with Literature Skills
Your work must be informed and supported by scholarly material that is relevant to and focused on the task(s)
set. You should provide evidence that you have accessed an appropriate
range of sources, which may be
academic, governmental and industrial; these sources may include academic journal articles, textbooks,
current news articles, organisational documents, and websites. You should consider the
credibility of your
sources; academic journals are normally highly credible sources while websites require careful
consideration/selection and should be used sparingly. Any sources you use should be current and up-todate, mostly published within the last five years or so, though seminal/important works in the field may be
older. You must provide
evidence of your research/own reading throughout your work, using a suitable
referencing system, including in-text citations in the main body of your work and a reference list at the end of
your work.
Guidance specific to this assessment:
You should show a wide level of reading, a minimum of 12 references, from a variety of sources including
textbooks, academic journals and academic based websites. You must reference Mullins (2013, 2016 or
2020) as your primary source for theory. There is no need to cite the case study itself when referring to the
material there.
2. Knowledge and Understanding Skills
At level 5, you should be able to demonstrate: sound knowledge and critical understanding of the wellestablished concepts and principles of the subject area and the way in which those principles have
developed; knowledge of the main methods of enquiry in the discipline.
Knowledge relates to the facts,
information and skills you have acquired through your learning. You demonstrate your
understanding by
interpreting the meaning of the facts and information (knowledge). This means that you need to select and
include in your work the concepts, techniques, models, theories, etc. appropriate to the task(s) set. You
should be able to explain the theories, concepts, etc. meaningfully to show your understanding. Your
mark/grade will also depend upon the
extent to which you demonstrate your knowledge and understanding.
Guidance specific to this assessment:
The models/theories required have been specified in each of the tasks. You do not need to explain these in
depth, but introduce them briefly before analysing and applying them.
3. Cognitive and Intellectual Skills
You should be able to critically analyse information, and propose solutions to problems arising from that
analysis, including the critical evaluation of the appropriateness of different approaches to solving problems.
Your work must contain evidence of logical, analytical thinking, evaluation and synthesis. For example, to
examine and break information down into parts, make inferences, compile, compare and contrast information.
This means not just describing what! But also justifying: Why? How? When? Who? Where? At what cost? At
all times, you must provide justification/evidence for your arguments and judgements. Evidence that you have
reflected upon the ideas of others within the subject area is crucial to you providing a reasoned and informed
debate within your work. Furthermore, you should provide evidence that you are able to make sound
judgements and convincing arguments using data and concepts,with an understanding of the limits of
knowledge, and how this influences analyses and interpretations. Sound, valid conclusions are necessary
and must be derived from the content of your work. Where relevant, alternative solutions and
recommendations may be proposed.
Guidance specific to this assessment:
The task specifies what is required of you. Take care to answer only the question set fully. You may find it
helpful to keep the task to hand when writing to remain focused on it. Make sure you draw conclusions
GUIDANCE FOR STUDENTS IN THE
COMPLETION OF TASKS – ASSIGNMENT 1

Page 9 of 21
from the content of your work and provide a direct answer to the question in summary at the end of the
task.
4. Practical Skills
At level 5, you should be able to use/deploy a range of established techniques within the discipline, and apply
underlying concepts and principles outside the context in which they were first studied, including, where
appropriate, the application of those principles in an employment context. You should be able to demonstrate
how the subject-related concepts and ideas relate to real world situations and/or a particular context. How do
they work in practice? You will deploy models, methods, techniques, and/or theories, in that context, to
assess current situations, perhaps to formulate plans or solutions to solve problems, or to create artefacts,
some of which may be creative. This is likely to involve, for instance, the use of real world artefacts, examples
and cases, the application of a model within an organisation and/or benchmarking one theory or organisation
against others based on stated criteria. You should show awareness of the limitations of concepts and
theories when applied in particular contexts.
Guidance specific to this assessment:
You should deploy your chosen techniques, models and/or theories, to the case study. Use material from the
case as examples and wider reading to illustrate the points you make. Where possible you should show
awareness of the limitations of the model used when applied to the case itself.
5. Transferable Skills for Life and Professional Practice
Your work must provide evidence of the qualities and transferable skills necessary for employment requiring
the exercise of personal responsibility and decision-making. This includes demonstrating: professional
development
to advance existing skills and acquire new competences that will enable you to assume
significant responsibility within organisations; that you can initiate and complete tasks and procedures,
whether individually and/or collaboratively; that you can use appropriate media to effectively communicate
information, arguments and analysis in a variety of forms to specialist and non-specialist audiences; fluency
of expression; clarity and effectiveness in presentation and organisation. Work shouldbe coherent and wellstructured in presentation and organisation.
Guidance specific to this assessment:
You should write an essay in a recognised format. All writing should be academic style, formal, focused,
concise and subject specific. It should use a font of Arial 11 point or Times New Roman 12 point and be
1.5 or double spaced. All graphs, charts, and figures in the main body must be clearly referenced beside or
beneath. Where possible they should not be on separate pages but should be incorporated within the text.

Page 10 of 21
This section details the extent to which the assessment criteria are demonstrated by you, which in turn determines your mark. The
marks available for each category of skill are shown. Lecturers will use the space provided to comment on the achievement of the
task(s), including those areas in which you have performed well and areas that would benefit from development/improvement.

Generic Assessment Criteria Marks
available
Marks
awarded
1. Engagement with Literature Skills
.
10
2. Knowledge and Understanding Skills
20
3. Cognitive and Intellectual Skills
30
4. Practical Application Skills
30
5. Transferable Skills for Life and Professional Practice
10

 

Assessment Mark (Assessment marks are subject to ratification at the
Exam Board. These comments and marks are to give feedback on module work
and are for guidance only until they are confirmed. )
Late Submission Penalties (tick if
appropriate)
%
Up to 1 week late (40% Max)
Over 1 week late (0%)

STUDENT FEEDBACK FORM – A1
Page 11 of 21

Student name: Student ID number:
Programme: BA International Hotel Management
Module: Management & Organisational Behaviour
Module code: BMIH5004 Contribution to
Overall Module
Assessment (%):
50%
(2 of 2)
Lecturer: Robyn Griffiths, Lisa Knight Internal Verifier: Huw Thomas
Assignment Title: Hotel Organisational Audit Word count
(or equivalent):
2,000
Submission
deadline:
10th March 2023, 23:55 Return date of provisional marks
& written feedback:
By 10th April 2023
Submission
method:
All written assessments, where practical and possible, must be submitted via Turnitin unless
otherwise instructed by the Lecturer. (Please DO NOT put this assessment specification into
Turnitin or it will match many similarities with other students’ submissions.)
Alternative submission method (if applicable):
Late submission of the assessment will result in a late penalty mark.
Penalties for late
submission: Up to one week late, maximum mark of 40%. Over one week late, 0%. Only the
Extenuating Circumstances Panel may approve a change to submission dates.
Academic
honesty /
referencing:
Academic honesty is required. In the main body of your submission you must give credit to
authors on whose research and ideas your work is based. Append to your submission a reference
list that indicates the books, articles, etc. that you have used, cited or quoted in order to complete
this assessment.

 

Module Learning Outcomes
(from module syllabus)
To coherently and critically analyse the relationship between structure, culture, people and
organisational performance;
To critically understand the essential nature of managerial work (in terms of both functions and
processes) communicate the role of leadership and furthermore, explain the variables that
determine effective management and leadership;
To critically evaluate the behavioural approach to management, through understanding of the
factors that affect differences in individual behaviour.

LEVEL 5 ASSESSMENT
SPECIFICATION

Page 12 of 21
Produce a report of 2000 words containing the results of your audit.
Select and research one of the following hotel groups as your audit case study:

Intercontinental Hotels
Group (IHG)
Hilton
Hotel Group
Best Western
Hotel Group

You may also choose a ‘wildcard’ and opt for an alternative hotel organisation to audit from
those listed. This must be agreed with the tutor in advance of starting work.
With reference to relevant theories, audit, analyse and critically evaluate your chosen
organisation, at both corporate and individual unit levels, using the following key
topics (approx.550 words per section)
Organisation structure, culture and goals
Recent change initiatives, their impact and how well these were managed
The organisation’s strategic direction and current business performance
Use evidence from your research to support your analysis, and try to use up to date
material from the news to provide examples for each topic. You may choose the order of
topics but be aware that the lectures/tutorials may not have taken place for all topics when
you begin so refer to the module outline for guidance and plan accordingly.
Whilst it is appreciated that you may need to make specific reference to how effectively
your chosen group has managed the business impact and challenges represented by the
Covid-19 pandemic – It is
NOT a specific requirement that you discussed pandemic
and/or its effects in very great detail.
TASK DESCRIPTION
Page 13 of 21
NOTE: The guidance offered below is linked to the five generic assessment criteria given below.
1. Engagement with Literature Skills
Your work must be informed and supported by scholarly material that is relevant to and focused on the task(s)
set. You should provide evidence that you have accessed an appropriate
range of sources, which may be
academic, governmental and industrial; these sources may include academic journal articles, textbooks,
current news articles, organisational documents, and websites. You should consider the
credibility of your
sources; academic journals are normally highly credible sources while websites require careful
consideration/selection and should be used sparingly. Any sources you use should be current and up-todate, mostly published within the last five years or so, though seminal/important works in the field may be
older. You must provide
evidence of your research/own reading throughout your work, using a suitable
referencing system, including in-text citations in the main body of your work and a reference list at the end of
your work.
Guidance specific to this assessment:
You should show a wide level of reading, a minimum of 20 references, from a variety of sources including
textbooks, academic journals and academic based websites. You may cite company information and
newspaper/magazine articles but take care with issues of reliability and validity.
2. Knowledge and Understanding Skills
At level 5, you should be able to demonstrate: sound knowledge and critical understanding of the wellestablished concepts and principles of the subject area and the way in which those principles have
developed; knowledge of the main methods of enquiry in the discipline.
Knowledge relates to the facts,
information and skills you have acquired through your learning. You demonstrate your
understanding by
interpreting the meaning of the facts and information (knowledge). This means that you need to select and
include in your work the concepts, techniques, models, theories, etc. appropriate to the task(s) set. You
should be able to explain the theories, concepts, etc. meaningfully to show your understanding. Your
mark/grade will also depend upon the
extent to which you demonstrate your knowledge and understanding.
Guidance specific to this assessment:
Use a selection of the models/theories discussed in the course relating to each topic to provide a framework
for your audit. You do not need to explain these in depth, but introduce them briefly before analysing and
applying them.
3. Cognitive and Intellectual Skills
You should be able to critically analyse information, and propose solutions to problems arising from that
analysis, including the critical evaluation of the appropriateness of different approaches to solving problems.
Your work must contain evidence of logical, analytical thinking, evaluation and synthesis. For example, to
examine and break information down into parts, make inferences, compile, compare and contrast information.
This means not just describing what! But also justifying: Why? How? When? Who? Where? At what cost? At
all times, you must provide justification/evidence for your arguments and judgements. Evidence that you have
reflected upon the ideas of others within the subject area is crucial to you providing a reasoned and informed
debate within your work. Furthermore, you should provide evidence that you are able to make sound
judgements and convincing arguments using data and concepts,with an understanding of the limits of
knowledge, and how this influences analyses and interpretations. Sound, valid conclusions are necessary
and must be derived from the content of your work. Where relevant, alternative solutions and
recommendations may be proposed.
Guidance specific to this assessment:
GUIDANCE FOR STUDENTS IN THE
COMPLETION OF TASKS – ASSIGNMENT 2

Page 14 of 21
The tasks themselves specify what is required of you. Take care to answer each question fully, and answer
only the question set. You may find it helpful to keep the tasks to hand when writing to remain focused on
them. Make sure you draw conclusions from the content of your work and highlight any key
recommendations.
4. Practical Skills
At level 5, you should be able to use/deploy a range of established techniques within the discipline, and apply
underlying concepts and principles outside the context in which they were first studied, including, where
appropriate, the application of those principles in an employment context. You should be able to demonstrate
how the subject-related concepts and ideas relate to real world situations and/or a particular context. How do
they work in practice? You will deploy models, methods, techniques, and/or theories, in that context, to
assess current situations, perhaps to formulate plans or solutions to solve problems, or to create artefacts,
some of which may be creative. This is likely to involve, for instance, the use of real world artefacts, examples
and cases, the application of a model within an organisation and/or benchmarking one theory or organisation
against others based on stated criteria. You should show awareness of the limitations of concepts and
theories when applied in particular contexts.
Guidance specific to this assessment:
You should deploy your chosen techniques, models and/or theories to your chosen organisation. Use material
from your research and wider reading to illustrate the points you make. Where possible you should show
awareness of the limitations of the models used when applied to the case itself.
5. Transferable Skills for Life and Professional Practice
Your work must provide evidence of the qualities and transferable skills necessary for employment requiring
the exercise of personal responsibility and decision-making. This includes demonstrating: professional
development
to advance existing skills and acquire new competences that will enable you to assume
significant responsibility within organisations; that you can initiate and complete tasks and procedures,
whether individually and/or collaboratively; that you can use appropriate media to effectively communicate
information, arguments and analysis in a variety of forms to specialist and non-specialist audiences; fluency
of expression; clarity and effectiveness in presentation and organisation. Work shouldbe coherent and wellstructured in presentation and organisation.
Guidance specific to this assessment:
You should write a report in a recognised format. All writing should be academic style, formal, focused,
concise and subject specific. It should use a font of Arial 12 point or Times New Roman 12 point, and be
1.5 or double spaced. All graphs, charts, and figures in the main body must be clearly referenced beside or
beneath. Where possible they should not be on separate pages but should be incorporated within the text.

Page 15 of 21
This section details the extent to which the assessment criteria are demonstrated by you, which in turn determines your mark. The
marks available for each category of skill are shown. Lecturers will use the space provided to comment on the achievement of the
task(s), including those areas in which you have performed well and areas that would benefit from development/improvement.

Generic Assessment Criteria Marks
available
Marks
awarded
1. Engagement with Literature Skills
.
10
2. Knowledge and Understanding Skills
10
3. Cognitive and Intellectual Skills
40
4. Practical Application Skills
30
5. Transferable Skills for Life and Professional Practice
10

 

Assessment Mark (Assessment marks are subject to ratification at the
Exam Board. These comments and marks are to give feedback on module work
and are for guidance only until they are confirmed. )
Late Submission Penalties (tick if
appropriate)
%
Up to 1 week late (40% Max)
Over 1 week late (0%)

STUDENT FEEDBACK FORM – A2 AUDIT REPORT

Level 5
In accordance with the Framework for Higher Education Qualifications, at the end of Level 5 students will be expected to have developed sound knowledge
and critical understanding of the well-established concepts and principles in their field of study, and of the way in which those principles have developed.
They will have learned to apply those concepts and principles more widely outside the context in which they were first studied, including, where appropriate,
the application of those principles in an employment context. They will have knowledge of the main methods of enquiry in the subject area, and ability to
evaluate critically different approaches to problem solving. They will possess an understanding of the limits of their knowledge, and how this influences their
analyses and interpretations. They will be able to use a range of established techniques to initiate and undertake critical analysis of information, and to
propose solutions to problems arising from that analysis. They will be able to effectively communicate information, arguments and analysis in a variety of
forms to specialist and non-specialist audiences, and deploy key techniques of the discipline effectively. They will be able to undertake further training,
develop existing skills and acquire new competences that will enable them to assume significant responsibility within organisations. They will have the
qualities and transferable skills necessary for employment requiring the exercise of personal responsibility and decision-making.

 

Level 5 FAIL MARGINAL FAIL SATISFACTORY
(3
rd / Pass)
GOOD
(2.2 / Pass)
VERY GOOD
(2.1 / Merit)
EXCELLENT
(1
st / Distinction)
EXCEPTIONAL
(1
st / Distinction)
Category 0-29% 30-39% 40-49% 50-59% 60-69% 70-84% 85-100%
Engagement
with literature
(including
reading,
referencing,
academic
conventions and
academic
honesty)
Little or no
evidence of
reading
and/or
reliance on
inappropriate
sources.
Views and
findings mostly
unsupported and
non
authoritative.
Referencing
conventions
used
incoherently or
largely absent.
Poor
engagement
with essential
reading. No
evidence of
wider reading.
Reliance on
inappropriate
sources, and/or
indiscriminate
use of sources.
Heavily reliant
on information
gained through
class contact.
Inconsistent and
weak use of
referencing.
Engagement
with a limited
range of mostly
relevant and
credible sources.
Some omissions
and minor
errors.
Referencing
conventions
evident though
not always
applied
accurately or
consistently.
Engagement
with an
appropriate
range of
literature,
including
sources
retrieved
independently.
Some over
reliance on texts.
Referencing may
show minor
inaccuracies or
inconsistencies.
Engagement
with a wide
range of
literature,
including
sources
retrieved
independently.
Selection of
relevant and
credible sources.
Very good use of
referencing, with
no/very few
inaccuracies or
inconsistencies.
Engagement
with an
extensive range
of relevant and
credible
literature.
Consistently
accurate
application of
referencing.
Exceptional
engagement
with an
extensive range
of relevant and
credible
literature. High
level referencing
skills
consistently
applied.

GENERIC ASSESSMENT CRITERIA – BOTH ASSESSMENTS

Level 5 FAIL MARGINAL FAIL SATISFACTORY
(3
rd / Pass)
GOOD
(2.2 / Pass)
VERY GOOD
(2.1 / Merit)
EXCELLENT
(1
st / Distinction)
EXCEPTIONAL
(1
st / Distinction)
Category 0-29% 30-39% 40-49% 50-59% 60-69% 70-84% 85-100%
Knowledge
and
understanding
(Sound
knowledge and
critical
understanding of
the well
established
concepts and
principles in their
field of study;
knowledge of the
main methods of
enquiry in the
discipline.)
Major gaps in
knowledge with
unsatisfactory,
uncritical
understanding of
the subject
matter. Much
irrelevant
material.
Substantial
inaccuracies.
Significantly
flawed
understanding of
the main
methods of
enquiry in the
discipline.
Fragmentary
knowledge, with
only superficial
critical
understanding.
Some significant
inaccuracies
and/or irrelevant
material.
Incomplete or
partially flawed
understanding of
the main
methods of
enquiry in the
discipline.
Limited but
adequate
knowledge and
critical
understanding of
the well
established
concepts and
principles within
the subject area,
with a few gaps
in the selection
of material. A
narrow critical
understanding of
the main
methods of
enquiry.
Knowledge is
reasonably
detailed and
accurate. A good
critical
understanding of
the well
established
concepts and
principles and
the main
methods of
enquiry, with
minor gaps in
the selection of
material.
Knowledge is
reasonably
extensive.
Exhibits very
competent
critical
understanding of
the well
established
concepts and
principles of the
subject and the
main methods of
enquiry.
Breadth and
depth of
knowledge.
Excellent,
detailed
knowledge and
highly critical
understanding of
the well
established
concepts and
principles of the
subject and the
main methods of
enquiry.
Exceptionally
detailed
knowledge and
outstanding
critical
understanding of
the well
established
concepts and
principles of the
subject and the
main methods of
enquiry. May go
beyond
established
theories.

 

Level 5 FAIL MARGINAL FAIL SATISFACTORY
(3
rd / Pass)
GOOD
(2.2 / Pass)
VERY GOOD
(2.1 / Merit)
EXCELLENT
(1
st / Distinction)
EXCEPTIONAL
(1
st / Distinction)
Category 0-29% 30-39% 40-49% 50-59% 60-69% 70-84% 85-100%
Cognitive and
intellectual
skills
(Critical
evaluation and
analysis of
concepts and
principles;
argument and
judgement
; the
limits of their
knowledge, and
how this
influences their
analyses and
interpretations.)
Wholly or almost
wholly
descriptive work.
Little or no
critical
evaluation and
analysis of
concepts and
principles.
Failure to
develop
arguments,
leading to
illogical or invalid
judgements.
Unsubstantiated
generalisations
or opinion, made
without use of
any credible
evidence.
Largely
descriptive work,
with superficial
use of critical
evaluation and
analysis of
concepts and
principles. Weak
development of
arguments and
judgements.
Information
accepted
uncritically, uses
generalised
statements
made with scant
evidence and
unsubstantiated
opinions. Ideas
sometimes
illogical and
contradictory.
Limited attempt
at critical
evaluation and
analysis of
concepts and
principles,
tending towards
description.
Some evidence
to support
arguments and
judgements but
these may be
underdeveloped,
with a little
inconsistency /
mis
interpretation or
failure to fully
recognise limits
of knowledge.
Some critical
evaluation and
analysis of
concepts and
principles,
though
descriptive in
parts.
An emerging
awareness the
limits of their
knowledge and
ability to use
evidence to
support the
argument though
with some
tendency to
assert/state
opinion rather
than argue on
the basis of
reason and
evidence.
Mostly valid
arguments and
logical
judgements.
Sound critical
evaluation and
analysis of
concepts. Is
selective in the
range of
evidence used
and synthesises
rather than
describes. Ability
to devise
arguments that
show awareness
of different
stances, and use
evidence
convincingly, to
support
appropriate and
valid
judgements.
Excellent critical
evaluation and
analysis of
concepts and
principles
leading to
logical,
evidence-based,
reasoned
arguments and
judgements.
Explicit
recognition of
other stances
and a strong
awareness of
the limits of their
knowledge.
A capacity for
independent
thought and
ability to ‘see
beyond the
question’,
suggesting some
grasp of the
broader field and
wider concepts.
Outstanding
critical
evaluation and
analysis of
concepts and
principles. Uses
evidence
exceptionally
well to connect
ideas, and
support highly
logical and
persuasive,
arguments and
judgements.
Evidence of
independent
thought and
ability to ‘see
beyond the
question’,
suggesting a
clear grasp of
the broader field
and wider
concepts.
Perceptive
recognition of
the limits of their
knowledge, and
how this
influences their
analyses and
interpretations.

 

Level 5 FAIL MARGINAL FAIL SATISFACTORY
(3
rd / Pass)
GOOD
(2.2 / Pass)
VERY GOOD
(2.1 / Merit)
EXCELLENT
(1
st / Distinction)
EXCEPTIONAL
(1
st / Distinction)
Category 0-29% 30-39% 40-49% 50-59% 60-69% 70-84% 85-100%
Practical skills
(Apply underlying
concepts and
principles more
widely outside the
context in which
they were first
studied; use a
range of
established
techniques;
propose solutions
to problems
arising from
analysis.)
Limited or no
use of
established
methods,
materials, tools
and/or
techniques.
Little or no
appreciation of
the context of
the application.
Limited
understanding of
the application of
theory to
practice or
making
appropriate links
between the two.
Very weak
problem-solving
skills outside the
context in which
they were first
studied.
Rudimentary
application of
established
methods,
materials, tools
and/or
techniques but
without
consideration
and
competence.
Flawed
appreciation of
the context of
the application.
Weak
understanding of
the application of
theory to
practice, with
only occasional
evidence of
making
appropriate links
between the two.
Weak problem
solving skills
outside the
context in which
they were first
studied.
An adequate
awareness and
mostly
appropriate
application of
established
methods,
materials, tools
and/or
techniques.
Basic
appreciation of
the context of
the application.
Theoretical
knowledge and
understanding
applied in
practice, but not
always making
logical links
between the two.
Can identify
problems and
propose basic
solutions outside
the context in
which they were
first studied.
A good and
appropriate
application of
established
methods,
materials, tools
and/or
techniques.
Clear
appreciation of
the context of
the application.
Mainly
consistent,
accurate and
logical
application of
theory to
practice, making
appropriate links
between the two.
Can identify
problems and
propose mostly
appropriate
solutions outside
the context in
which they were
first studied.
A very good
application of a
range of
established
methods,
materials, tools
and/or
techniques.
Very good
consideration of
the context of
the application,
with perceptive
insights.
Consistent,
accurate and
logical
application of
theory to
practice, making
appropriate links
between the two.
Can identify
problems and
propose
appropriate
solutions outside
the context in
which they were
first studied.
Evidence of
some creativity.
An advanced
application of a
range of
established
methods,
materials, tools
and/or
techniques.
The context of
the application is
well considered,
and insightful.
Consistent,
accurate and
logical
application of
theory to
practice, making
well-developed
links between
the two. Can
identify problems
and propose
excellent,
creative
solutions outside
the context in
which they were
first studied.
Exceptional
levels of
application and
deployment
skills using
established
methods,
materials, tools
and/or
techniques.
Consistent,
accurate and
logical
application of
theory to
practice, making
highly developed
links between
the two. Can
identify routine
and non-routine
problems and
propose quite
sophisticated,
creative
solutions outside
the context in
which they were
first studied.

 

Level 5 FAIL MARGINAL FAIL SATISFACTORY
(3
rd / Pass)
GOOD
(2.2 / Pass)
VERY GOOD
(2.1 / Merit)
EXCELLENT
(1
st / Distinction)
EXCEPTIONAL
(1
st / Distinction)
Category 0-29% 30-39% 40-49% 50-59% 60-69% 70-84% 85-100%
Transferable
skills for life
and
professional
practice
(Effectively
communicate in a
variety of forms
to specialist and
non-specialist
audiences; the
qualities and
transferable skills
necessary for
employment
requiring the
exercise of
personal
responsibility and
decision-making.)
Communication
medium is
inappropriate or
misapplied.
Work is poorly
structured,
disorganised
and/or
confusingly
expressed. Very
weak use of
language and/or
very
inappropriate
style. Failure to
work effectively
as part of a
group. Little or
no evidence of
the skills for
employment
requiring the
exercise of
personal
responsibility
and decision
making.
Communication
medium is poorly
designed and/or
not suitable for
the audience.
Work is poorly
presented in a
disjointed
manner. It is
loosely, and at
times
incoherently,
structured, with
information and
ideas often
poorly
expressed.
Weak use of
language and/or
inappropriate
style. Flawed
approach to
group work,
meeting only
partial
obligations to
others. Limited
evidence of the
skills for
employment
requiring the
exercise of
personal
responsibility
and decision
making.
Can
communicate in
a suitable
medium for the
audience but
with some room
for improvement.
Mostly ordered
presentation and
structure in
which relevant
ideas / concepts
are reasonably
expressed. Work
may lack
coherence in
places. Can
work as part of a
group, meeting
most obligations
to others but
perhaps with
limited
involvement in
group activities.
Demonstrates
the basic skills
for employment
requiring the
exercise of
personal
responsibility
and decision
making, with
some areas of
minor weakness.
Can
communicate
effectively in a
suitable medium
for the audience,
but may have
minor errors.
Mostly coherent,
organised work,
in a suitable
structure and is
for the most part
clearly
expressed. Can
work effectively
independently
and/or as part of
a team, with
clear
contribution to
group activities.
Demonstrates
the skills for
employment
requiring the
exercise of
personal
responsibility
and decision
making, with
some areas of
strength and
some of minor
weakness.
Can
communicate
well, confidently
and consistently
in a suitable
medium for the
audience.
Work is
coherent, fluent,
well-structured
and organised.
Can work very
well
autonomously
and/or as part of
a team, with very
good
contribution to
group activities.
Demonstrates
very good skills
for employment
requiring the
exercise of
personal
responsibility
and decision
making, with just
occasional minor
weakness.
Can
communicate
professionally
confidently and
consistently in a
suitable medium
for the audience.
Work is
coherent, very
fluent and is
presented
proficiently. Can
work
autonomously
with initiative.
Where relevant
can work
professionally
within a team,
showing
leadership skills
as appropriate,
and meeting
obligations.
Demonstrates
excellent skills
for employment
requiring the
exercise of
personal
responsibility
and decision
making and an
appetite for
further
development.
Can
communicate
with an
exceptionally
high level of
professionalism,
highly suitable
for the audience.
Work is
exceptionally
coherent, very
fluent and is
presented
professionally.
Can work
exceptionally
well within a
team, showing
leadership skills.
Demonstrates
exceptional skills
for employment
requiring the
exercise of
personal
responsibility
and decision
making and an
appetite for
further
development.