sal
by Sanjil Amgain
Submission date: 05-Jan-2022 03:37PM (UTC+0100)
Submission ID: 1737758920
File name: 6
Word count: 5438
Character count: 31320

1

2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11

13 12
14
15
16 17
18
19
20
21
22
24 23
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48

FINAL GRADE
74/100
GRADEMARK REPORT
GENERAL COMMENTS
Instructor
Much ongoing feedback was provided on draft
versions, hence fewer in-text comments
KNOWLEDGE AND UNDERSTANDING (20%) –
14.6% (73%)
Well demonstrated, informative general
introduction; 1.1 serves its purpose, current
citations provided, knowledge gap identified; aim
and objectives well formulated and addressed;
RQs well formulated, could be briefly explained,
tentative Hs well formulated and partly explained
APPLICATION OF KNOWLEDGE (30%) – 22.5%
(75%)
Knowledge about literature review and research
design well applied, backed up with references
and the suitable terminology; theoretical
framework identified; literature review is
thematically structured, numerous citations well
embedded in the text, evidence of synthesis;
literature gap is identified and documented; the
stance in section 2 could be a bit more critical to
merit even a higher evaluation
EVALUATION of applicable research design,
assessment of ethical issues
(40%) – 28% (70%)
3.1 well addressed with minor inaccuracies; 3.2
mostly sufficiently discussed; 3.3 well addressed,
only secondary data sources could be better
explained; 3.4 mostly addressed although not
always well explained, some repetition, could be
better structured; 3.5 rather well
and comprehensively addressed; scope could be a
bit better explained; limitations are identified to a
certain extent; ethical issues comprehensively
discussed, section 5 is very comprehensive, good
quality Gantt chart provided, well referred to in the
text, resources well identified
COMMUNICATION AND
PRESENTATION & REFERENCING STYLE (10%) –
8.5% (85%)
Structure observed, purpose well-understood,
comprehensive, well presented and formatted,
proofread, only some minor linguistic inaccuracies,
correct citations and references, appendix
provides tentative questionnaire questions,
feasibility and plausibility of the study established
Total score: 74% (73.6%)
PAGE 1
PAGE 2
Comment 1
no number
PAGE 3
PAGE 4
Comment 2
brickand mortar
Comment 3
any citation here?
Comment 4
what is the difference?
Comment 5
any example?
Comment 6
bridge
Comment 7
rally?
This is new to me
Comment 8
page break
PAGE 5
Comment 9
hopefully you are more specific with regard to secondary data below
Comment 10
from
PAGE 6
Comment 11
hypotheses
PAGE 7
PAGE 8
Comment 12
is it generally so?
Comment 13
Online
Comment 14
according to whom?
PAGE 9
Comment 15
comma here
PAGE 10
Comment 16
data?
Comment 17
rephrase
Comment 18
rephrase
Comment 19
This is not purpose – descriptive, explanatory or exploratory
Comment 20
be more specific
PAGE 11
Comment 21
such as indicated an example
Comment 22
what about secondary data and qualitative primary data?
Comment 23
so at leat two methods
Comment 24
What about time horizon?
Comment 25
explain
PAGE 12
Comment 26
This comes later – first identify sampling techniques
Comment 27
not clear
Comment 28
not quite.,rephrase
Comment 29
disseminate
PAGE 13
Comment 30
and nominal = categorical
Comment 31
? r
ephrase
variables?
Comment 32
too vague
Comment 33
be more specific!
Comment 34
explain!
Comment 35
??
Not clear – first explain hoe qualitative data will be analysed
Comment 36
Any other suitable test?
Comment 37
avoid repetition, structure better
PAGE 14
Comment 38
repetition
Comment 39
You mentioned interviews as well, did you?
What about narrative analysis?
Comment 40
of what?
Comment 41
mitigate such threats
PAGE 15
Comment 42
in what language?
How will you reach out to your respondents? – mention that in 3.3
Comment 43
rephrase
Comment 44
explain
PAGE 16
Comment 45
rephrase
refer to representativeness in relation to total population – can you determine its size in 3.2?
Comment 46
meaning?
Comment 47
? e
xplain
PAGE 17
Comment 48
delete ‘a view of’
PAGE 18
PAGE 19
PAGE 20
PAGE 21
PAGE 22
PAGE 23
PAGE 24