Introduction to Epidemiology and Biostatistics Assessment

127 views 9:01 am 0 Comments May 17, 2023

Introduction to Epidemiology and Biostatistics Assessment
Task 2: Written Assessment
Critical appraisal of an epidemiological paper.
A paper for critical appraisal will be provided to you. The title, abstract, most of the discussion and some parts of the paper will be redacted.
Use the guidance given in Chapter 9 of the text book (Essential Epidemiology Webb, Bain, Page version 3) and the checklists in the Critical Appraisal
lecture to frame your critical appraisal. Your critical appraisal should cover design, study population, errors, confounding, study findings and
interpretation and your conclusions about the study.
Word count: 1500-2000 words
No referencing is required for this task
Assessment Task 2 Marking Rubric

Outstanding
HD
(100%-85%)		 Advanced
D
(84%-75%)		 Proficient
C
(74%-65%)		 Functional
P
(64%-50%)		 Developing
F
(49%-0%)
Correctly identifies the type of
study, study question, study
factors and outcome factors.
Discusses whether the
appropriate design was used.
Clearly discusses all sources
of selection bias,
measurement error and
confounding and their impact
on for the validity of the study
and the measures of
association.
Identifies and demonstrates
understanding of the
strengths and weaknesses of
the study. Makes an
appropriate assessment on
the ability of the paper to
support causality. Shows a
skilled use of epidemiological
terminology in their
discussion of the paper.
Clearly structures their report
using the textbook and lecture
notes for guidance.		 Correctly identifies the type of
study, study question, study
factors, outcome factors and
study findings.
Discusses whether the
appropriate design was used.
Clearly discusses most
sources of selection bias,
measurement error and
confounding and their impact
on for the validity of the study.
Identifies and demonstrates
understanding of the
strengths and weaknesses of
the study. Makes an
appropriate assessment on
the ability of the paper to
support causality. Shows
appropriate use of
epidemiological terminology
in their discussion of the
paper. Clearly structures their
report using the textbook and
lecture notes for guidance.		 Correctly identifies the type of
study, study question, study
factors, outcome factors and
primary study findings.
Discusses the main sources
of selection bias,
measurement error and
confounding and their impact
on for the validity of the study.
Identifies the strengths and
weaknesses of the study.
Makes an appropriate
assessment on the ability of
the paper to support
causality. Uses
epidemiological terminology
in their discussion of the
paper.
Clearly structures their report.		 Correctly identifies the type of
study, study question, study
factors and outcome factors.
Discusses some sources of
selection bias, measurement
error and confounding and
their impact on for the validity
of the study. Makes an
assessment on the ability of
the paper to support
causality. Uses some
epidemiological terminology
in their discussion of the
paper.
Structures their report		 Does not correctly identify the
study type.
Makes major errors in
assessing the potential
strengths and/or faults of the
study.
No or very few
epidemiological terms are
correctly used.
Report is poorly structured.

1