Health Promotion Strategies & Methods

Health Promotion Strategies & Methods
FEEDBACK GUIDE (i.e. Rubric): Health Promotion Program Analysis

Fail: skills not demonstrated	Fail: some skills evident	Pass	Credit	Distinction	High Distinction
Introduction	 No introduction 0	 Inappropriate health issue or health issue not clearly stated or outlined  Specific program not chosen or not clearly named  No or inadequate mention of purpose & organisation of assignment 1 2	 Appropriate health issue chosen & outlined  Appropriate program named & aim of program stated  Adequate outline of purpose & organisation of assignment 3	 Well-chosen & clearly outlined health issue  Well-chosen program named & aim of program stated  Good outline of purpose & organisation of assignment 4	 Well-chosen & clearly outlined health issue linked to rationale for program  Well-chosen program named & aim of program stated  Very good outline of purpose & organisation of assignment 5	 Extremely well-chosen & clearly outlined health issue clearly linked to rationale for program  Extremely well-chosen program with program aim outlined  Excellent orientation to purpose & organisation of assignment 6
Summary of intervention	 No summary of intervention 0	 Inadequate summary of intervention 4 5 6 7	 Adequate summary of intervention 8 9	 Good summary of intervention 10 11	 Very good summary of intervention 12	 Excellent summary of intervention 13 14 15 16
Why is it a health promotion intervention?	 No rationale presented 0	 Inadequately presented rationale 4 5 6 7	 Adequate presentation of rationale 8 9	 Well-presented rationale 10 11	 Very well presented rationale 12	 Excellent & insightful rationale 13 14 15 16
Theoretical underpinnings of intervention	 No discussion of theoretical underpinnings 0	 Inadequate discussion of theoretical underpinnings 4 5 6 7	 Adequate discussion of theoretical underpinnings 8 9	 Good discussion of theoretical underpinnings 10 11	 Very good discussion of theoretical underpinnings 12	 Excellent discussion of theoretical underpinnings 13 14 15 16
Values, attitudes & beliefs of target group	 No discussion of VAB of target group 0	 Inadequate discussion of VAB of target group 4 5 6 7	 Adequate discussion of VAB of target group 8 9	 Good discussion of VAB of target group 10 11	 Very good discussion of VAB of target group 12	 Excellent discussion of VAB of target group 13 14 15 16
Reasons for success	 No discussion of reasons for success 0	 Inadequate discussion of reasons for success 4 5 6 7	 Adequate discussion of reasons for success 8 9	 Good discussion of reasons for success 10 11	 Very good discussion of reasons for success 12	 Excellent discussion of reasons for success 13 14 15 16
Criteria by which above five sections assessed:	 No examples, reasons or evidence presented  Unable to demonstrate understanding of content  Only a few general points made  Factual errors presented  Unable to demonstrate understanding of health promotion principles & practice	 Inappropriate/inconsistent/inadequate use of examples, reasons or evidence  Demonstrated limited understanding of content  General points made  Little/no specific details given  Irrelevant information given  Demonstrated inadequate understanding of health promotion principles & practice	 Adequate examples, reasons & evidence presented  Demonstrated understanding of most important content  Some points elaborated with details  Mostly relevant information given  Demonstrated adequate understanding of health promotion principles & practice	 Good examples, reasons & evidence presented  Demonstrated understanding of all content  All points elaborated  Only relevant information given  Demonstrated good understanding of health promotion principles & practice	 Well supported by convincing examples, reasons & evidence  Demonstrated good understanding of all content  Clear & detailed information  Demonstrated excellent understanding of health promotion principles & practice  Evidence of critical thinking	 Outstanding examples, reasons & evidence presented  Demonstrated excellent understanding of all content  Insightful discussion of fully elaborated points  Demonstrated outstanding understanding of health promotion principles & practice  Outstanding critical thinking demonstrated
Appropriate references & APA referencing style	 No/inappropriate references  References do not support thesis  Citation & referencing errors 0	 1 -14 appropriate references support thesis/argument & comments  Citation & referencing errors 1 2 3 4	 15 appropriate references support thesis/argument & comments  No errors in citation & referencing 5	 16-18 appropriate references support thesis & comments  No citation & referencing errors 6 7	 19-20 appropriate references support thesis/argument & comments well  No citation & referencing errors 8 9	 21 or more appropriate references support thesis & comments very well  No citation & referencing errors 10
Writing style: organisation, grammar, spelling & use of language *	 Disorganised with little or no structure  Difficult to understand what is being argued  Major difficulties with English – urgently seek assistance 0	 Poorly organised: information seems out of order & argument does not flow  Poor paragraph construction  Significant errors in spelling & grammar: work to develop your English skills 1	 Adequate organisation: most information in effective order & argument flows  Most paragraphs well-constructed  Minor errors in spelling & grammar: proof read before submission 2	 Good organisation: almost all information in effective order & argument flows well  Almost all paragraphs well constructed  No errors in spelling & grammar 3	 Strong organisation: all information in effective order & argument flows very well  All paragraphs well-constructed  Clear writing enables easy comprehension 3.5	 Excellent organisation: argument flows powerfully & seamlessly  Extremely well-constructed paragraphs  Understanding enhanced by excellent use of language 4

* NOTE: If problems with academic integrity (i.e. inadequate paraphrasing, citation or referencing) are detected, this assessment will not be marked and the plagiarism management policy will be followed by the Unit Coordinator.
Word Count: 2,800-3,000 words (2 marks out of 100 removed for every 200 words over 3,000)
© 2021 School of Public Health, Curtin University SCORE: /100 = /35%