Health Promotion Strategies & Methods

Health Promotion Strategies & Methods
FEEDBACK GUIDE (i.e. Rubric): Assessment 3 – PABCAR Investigation Report

Fail: skills not demonstrated	Fail: some skills evident	Pass	Credit	Distinction	High Distinction
Introduction	 Health issue not stated or outlined  Population group & community/setting not stated or defined  No mention of purpose & organisation of report 0	 Inappropriate health issue or health issue not clearly stated outlined  Inappropriate/unclear population group & community/setting  Inadequate mention of purpose & organisation of report 1.5	 Appropriate health issue chosen & outlined  Appropriate population group & community/setting chosen/defined  Adequate outline of purpose & organisation of report 2.5	 Well-chosen & clearly outlined health issue  Well-chosen & clearly defined population group & community/setting  Good outline of purpose & organisation of report 3	 Well-chosen & clearly outlined health issue clearly linked to a well-defined population group & community/setting  Very good outline of purpose & organisation of report 4	 Extremely well-chosen & clearly outlined health issue clearly linked to a well-defined population group & community/setting  Excellent orientation to purpose & organisation of report 5
1. What is the Problem & is it significant?	 No identification of problem & discussion of significance to community 0	 Inappropriate/insufficient identification of problem & discussion of significance to community 5	 Appropriate identification of problem & discussion of significance to community 10	 Well-discussed identification of problem & discussion of significance to community 12	 Well-chosen and clearly discussed identification of problem & discussion of significance to community 14	 Very well-chosen and insightfully discussed risk factors &/or behaviours 16 18 20
2. Is it Amenable to change?	 No discussion of measures & changeability 0	 Inappropriate/insufficient discussion of measures & changeability 5	 Adequate discussion of measures & changeability 10	 Good discussion of measures & changeability 12	 Well-chosen & well-discussed measures & changeability 14	 Very well-chosen & insightfully discussed measures & changeability 16 18 20
3. Are the intervention’s Benefits greater than Costs?	 No discussion of benefits & costs 0	 Inappropriate/insufficient discussion of benefits & costs 2.5	 Adequate discussion of major benefits & costs 5	 Good discussion of major benefits & costs 6	 Well-chosen & well-discussed benefits & costs 7	 Very well-chosen & insightfully discussed benefits & costs 8 9 10
4. Is there an Acceptance for the Intervention?	 No discussion of community & stakeholder acceptance 0	 Inappropriate/insufficient discussion of community & stakeholder acceptance 2.5	 Adequate discussion of community & stakeholder acceptance 5	 Good discussion of community & stakeholder acceptance 6	 Well-chosen & well-discussed community & stakeholder acceptance 7	 Very well-chosen & insightfully discussed community & stakeholder acceptance 8 9 10
5. What actions are Recommended?	 No/highly inappropriate recommendations identified 0	 Inadequate/inappropriate recommendations identified 5	 Adequate recommendations identified 10	 Well-chosen recommendations identified & discussed 12	 Very well-chosen recommendations identified & good discussion 14	 Outstanding recommendations identified & insightfully discussed 16 18 20
Criteria by which above five sections assessed	 No examples, reasons or evidence presented  Unable to demonstrate understanding of content  Only a few general points made  Factual errors presented  Unable to demonstrate understanding of health promotion principles & action	 Inappropriate/inconsistent/inadequate use of examples, reasons or evidence  Demonstrated limited understanding of content  General points made  Little/no specific details given  Irrelevant information given  Demonstrated inadequate understanding of health promotion principles & action	 Adequate examples, reasons & evidence presented  Demonstrated understanding of most important content  Some points elaborated with details  Mostly relevant information given  Demonstrated adequate understanding of health promotion principles & action	 Good examples, reasons & evidence presented  Demonstrated understanding of all content  All points elaborated  Only relevant information given  Demonstrated good understanding of health promotion principles & action	 Well supported by convincing examples, reasons & evidence  Demonstrated good understanding of all content  Clear & detailed information  Demonstrated excellent understanding of health promotion principles & actions  Evidence of critical thinking	 Outstanding examples, reasons & evidence presented  Demonstrated excellent understanding of all content  Insightful discussion of fully elaborated points  Demonstrated outstanding understanding of health promotion principles & actions  Outstanding critical thinking demonstrated
Appropriate references	 No/inappropriate references  References do not support thesis 0	 1 -19 appropriate references support thesis/argument & comments 1 2 3 4	 20 appropriate references support thesis/argument & comments 5	 21-25 appropriate references support thesis & comments 6 7	 26-30 appropriate references support thesis/argument & comments well 8 9	 31 or more appropriate references support thesis & comments very well 10
Writing style: organisation, grammar, spelling & use of language *	 Disorganised with little or no structure  Difficult to understand what is being argued  Major difficulties with English – urgently seek assistance 0	 Poorly organised: information seems out of order & argument does not flow  Poor paragraph construction  Significant errors in spelling & grammar: work to develop your English skills 1	 Adequate organisation: most information in effective order & argument flows  Most paragraphs well-constructed  Minor errors in spelling & grammar: proof read before submission 2	 Good organisation: almost all information in effective order & argument flows well  Almost all paragraphs well constructed  No errors in spelling & grammar 3	 Strong organisation: all information in effective order & argument flows very well  All paragraphs well-constructed  Clear writing enables easy comprehension 4	 Excellent organisation: argument flows powerfully & seamlessly  Extremely well-constructed paragraphs  Understanding enhanced by excellent use of language 5

* NOTE: If problems with academic integrity (i.e. inadequate paraphrasing, citation or referencing) are detected, this assessment will not be marked and the plagiarism management policy will be followed by the Unit Coordinator.
Word Count: 4,000 +/- 200 words (2 marks out of 100 removed for every 200 words over 4,000) SCORE: /100 = /35%
© 2021 School of Public Health, Curtin University