| Assessment 2 Marking Rubric: Group Assignment | |||||
| CRITERIA | Excellent (80-100%) | Very good (70-79%) | Good (60-69%) | Acceptable (50-59%) | Unacceptable (<50%) |
| Critical analysis of group processes (35% of total mark) |
Excellent, relevant issues identified and explained. Highly relevant OB theory or concepts are identified and explained. No errors in reasoning, accuracy or relevance. Issues strongly supported by relevant and specific examples. |
Relevant issues identified and explained. Relevant OB theory or concepts are identified and explained. Very few errors in reasoning, accuracy or relevance. Issues strongly supported by relevant and specific examples. |
Adequate issues identified and explained. OB theory or concepts are adequately described. May include some minor errors in reasoning, accuracy or relevance. |
Issues are identified. OB theory or concepts are described. May have some minor or a few major errors in reasoning, accuracy or relevance. |
Issues incomplete or not identified. Does not describe OB theory or concepts, or is mostly inaccurate or irrelevant. |
| Recommendations (35% of total mark) |
Excellent, logical and relevant recommendations provided for each identified issue. Highly relevant OB theory or concepts are identified and explained. Recommendations strongly supported by relevant and specific examples. |
Very good, logical and relevant recommendations provided for each identified issue. Relevant OB theory or concepts are identified and explained. Recommendations well supported by relevant and specific examples. |
Good relevant recommendations provided for each identified issue. OB theory or concepts are adequately described. Recommendations supported by relevant and specific examples. |
Solid recommendations. OB theory or concepts are described. Examples included but require improvement. |
Basic or underdeveloped recommendations. Does not describe OB theory or concepts, or is mostly inaccurate or irrelevant. Examples are disjointed or incorrectly stated. |
| Introduction and Conclusion (10% of total mark) |
Excellent introduction provided. Topic, background, position, and structure of the essay explained. Excellent conclusion summarising key points made. |
Very good introduction covering the topic, background, position, and structure of the essay explained. Very good conclusion summarising key points made. |
Good introduction and conclusion. Introduction covers topic, background, position, and structure of the essay. Conclusion summaries key points. |
Solid introduction and conclusion. May have some minor or a few major errors. |
Basic or underdeveloped introduction and conclusion. Do not cover points of the essay or is mostly inaccurate or missing. |
| Structure, organisation, writing (10% of total mark) |
Sequence and structure are logical and easy to follow; excellent overall organisation. Excellent grammar and spelling. |
Sequence and structure are logical and easy to follow; very good overall organisation. Very good grammar and spelling. |
Structured well enough to make sense; could be better organised and more tightly focused upon the topic, may lack focus, engagement or summary. Good grammar and spelling. |
Mostly coherent organisation; may have some sections where difficult to follow reasoning. Could be more clearly and logically organised. Some grammar and spelling errors. |
Lacks coherent organisation and structure. Describes disconnected bits of information or many direct quotes. Poor spelling and grammar. |
| Referencing (10% of total mark) |
Excellent use of relevant and appropriate sources of literature. Correct referencing throughout. |
Very good use of relevant and appropriate sources of literature. Correct referencing. |
Good use of relevant and appropriate sources of literature. Good referencing. |
Acceptable use of relevant sources of literature. Mostly correct referencing. |
Few if any literature sources included and poor referencing. |