MN3041QA:
Development for Success in Business
Assignment 3: Literature Review
Due: 31 March 2023 Weight: 50%
• Word limit: 1000-1200 words. You will incur penalties if you exceed the word limit.
• Essay template is available on WebLearn > Assessment Details > Assignment 3
Essay question: Write a literature review by doing research on a chosen topic of
interest and make a future research recommendation.
Your text font should be Times New Roman in font size 12 and double spaced (2.0)
Your report structure/subheadings are outlined below:
1. Introduction (around 150-200 words)
You should include a hook, background and an outline.
2. Literature Review (around 600 words)
Choose ONE of the topics below
• Motivation in the workplace
• Handling Poor Performance in the workplace
• Creativity & Innovation in the workplace
Read the appropriate sources in order to synthesise and write about the
previous and existing research, theory and debate on this topic. No bullet
points!
Use the websites below to help you find credible sources:
https://www.vlebooks.com/
https://books.qahighereducation.com
https://emu.londonmet.ac.uk
https://www.linkedin.com/learning/
3. Conclusion (around 250-300 words)
Based on what you have found, propose what future research can be conducted
on this topic to make impact and contribute to knowledge in this area.
4. Reference List (not included in the word count)
• Minimum of 5 academic sources
• Sources must be properly cited and written in the Harvard Referencing Style
| General | Level 3/4 o Acquisition of broad knowledge o Evaluate information o Use information to plan, develop and problem solve |
| 70-100 (A) |
Excellent demonstration of comprehension of the task with evidence of analysis, synthesis, evaluation and critical appraisal. Use of a wide variety of appropriate sources. Transformation of knowledge, independent thinking and development of ideas. Ability to communicate very clearly and effectively. Excellent evidence of preparation and organisation, structure and presentation of work – minimal errors. Good references, appropriate sources (quality and quantity. No errors in bibliography or citations. |
| 60-69 (B) | Very good demonstration of work and good comprehension of the task with evidence of analysis, synthesis, evaluation Use of a wide variety of appropriate sources Transformation of knowledge Independent thinking and development of ideas Ability to communication clearly and effectively Very good evidence of preparation Very good organisation, structure and presentation of work – minimal errors Good references, appropriate sources (quality and quantity). Minimal or no errors in reference list or citations. |
| 50-59 (C) |
Adequate – Satisfactory Some analysis but limited Some insight and exploration of ideas Sound conclusions No significant inaccuracies or omissions Some analysis, evaluation or synthesis of information Lacking clarity at times Some evidence of preparation Referencing is sound. Mostly appropriate sources. Numerous errors or inconsistencies |
| 40-49 (D) | All learning outcomes met Competent (practical) May be incomplete in knowledge (some errors or omissions) Insufficient analysis, evaluation or synthesis Limited application of theories/knowledge An awareness of appropriate principles/theories/techniques Irrelevance to the task at times Disorganised work with weak standard of presentation Numerous aberrations from the requirements of the task Referencing is attempted although may be inconsistent, many errors, weak sources |
| Condoned Pass 30-39 (F1) Fail 0-29 |
Learning outcomes not met Little relevant knowledge Lacking structure Numerous errors in structure and form Limited understanding of concepts/theories No appropriate analysis, evaluation or synthesis Significant inaccuracies/omissions Not competent Little or no attempt to use references and if so very weak with errors Learning Outcomes not met |