Kaplan Business School Assessment Outline
Assessment 2 Information
Subject Code: | MBA 502 |
Subject Name: | Emotional Intelligence, Cultural Intelligence and Diversity |
Assessment Title: | Developing Intercultural Competence |
Assessment Type: | Infographic |
Word Count: | 1 page |
Weighting: | 30 % |
Total Marks: | 30 |
Submission: | My KBS |
Due Date: | Tuesday 11.55 pm Week 9 |
Your Task
In response to the following scenario, students will produce a one-page infographic
detailing what would be included in a staff professional development workshop entitled
‘Developing Intercultural Competence’.
Assessment – Scenario
You work for a medium-sized Australian business. You manage a cohesive, supportive,
and friendly work team of 25 people who have worked together for the past 10 years.
Your company has invited 15 new staff from your subsidiary in Thailand to assist with a
project in Australia.15 of the new staff will soon join your team.
Your current work team are all native English-speaking, 2nd generation Australians.
They have minimal experience working overseas or with new migrant workers to
Australia. You are planning a professional development workshop that will be
delivered to the current Australian staff and the new Thai employees in your team.
The workshop will be required to deliver three outcomes:
1. An understanding of cultural differences based on Hofstede’s (1980)
model of Intercultural Dimensions and Hall’s (1963) high-context versus
low-context culture.
2. Three practical examples of how to adapt messages to make them
relevant and understandable for all members of staff. These examples
may be drawn upon either Hofstede’s theory or Hall’s theory of highcontext versus low-context cultures, or both.
3. Three strategies (specific actions) that will make the new staff feel
welcome and supported and be part of the team.
Kaplan Business School Assessment Outline
The following Subject Learning Outcomes addressed in this assessment are:
LO3: | Evaluate the importance and influence of diversity and culture and their associated implications for organisations and leadership. |
LO4: | Analyse and evaluate successful models of intercultural management, highlighting the issues and key strategies for overcoming challenges. |
Assessment Instructions
You are required to prepare a one-page infographic. You will give a clear and
succinct, one-page snapshot of what the participants will learn and do in the
workshop. Most importantly, you will include why they will be learning and doing
those things by linking them to relevant theories.
What is an infographic?
An infographic is a succinct visual representation of information. It includes a
variety of elements such as images, icons, text, charts, and diagrams to convey
messages briefly.
It helps to communicate complex and detailed information in an easily
understandable format.
The design of this infographic is entirely your choice. Exploring sites such as
Canva and PowerPoints will provide templates to prepare your Infographic.
Remember to adhere to the principles of an infographic – less text and more
imagery to convey meaning.
Your Infographic must contain the following information:
• A minimum of two theories and models of Cultural Intelligence.
• Minimum of five refereed journals are included in the infographic.
• Non-academic resources.
• Minimum of one such as websites, government publications, census data and
newspaper articles
• 3 examples of communications and 3 specific strategies on how to welcome new
staff
Kaplan Business School Assessment Outline
How to submit
.•
The Infographic should be submitted as an image.
• The Infographic should be uploaded into My KBS (Turnitin).
Important Study Information
Academic Integrity Policy
KBS values academic integrity. All students must understand the meaning and
consequences of cheating, plagiarism and other academic offences under the
Academic Integrity and Conduct Policy.
What is academic integrity and misconduct?
What are the penalties for academic misconduct?
What are the late penalties? How can I appeal my grade?
Click here for answers to these questions:
http://www.kbs.edu.au/current-students/student-policies/.
Word Limits for Written Assessments
Submissions that exceed the word limit by more than 10% will cease to be
marked from the point at which that limit is exceeded.
Study Assistance
Students may seek study assistance from their local Academic Learning Advisor
or refer to the resources on the MyKBS Academic Success Centre page. Click
here for this information.
Page 4 Kaplan Business School Assessment
Document classification: Internal Document classification: Internal
Criteria | HD (High Distinction) 85%-100% |
D (Distinction) 75%-84% |
CR (Credit) 65%-74% |
P (Pass) 50%-64% |
F (Fail) 0% -49% |
Accuracy of Infographic Content (15 marks) |
Demonstrates a high level of understanding of CI theories that are excellently summarised in the Infographic. The CI Models are explained demonstrating excellent subject knowledge. Three examples and strategies are provided that are understandable to the new staff. Accurate information is cited using research from varied sources to support the arguments. |
Demonstrates a very good level of understanding of CI theories, which are well summarised in the Infographic. The CI Models are very well explained demonstrating very good subject knowledge. Three strategies are very well explained that are understandable to the new staff. At least three resources are cited to support the arguments. |
Demonstrates an adequate level of understanding of CI theories, which are well summarised in the Infographic. The CI Models are adequately explained demonstrating adequate subject knowledge. Three strategies are very well explained that are understandable to the new staff. At least three resources are cited to support the arguments. |
Demonstrates a basic level of understanding of CI theories, which summarises with a basic explanation. Demonstrates a minimal understanding of the subject knowledge. Provided a basic explanation of three strategies that lack clarity for new staff. Resources are not clearly cited to support the arguments. |
Lacks a basic level of understanding of CI theories and does not provide a relevant explanation. Does not demonstrate a minimal understanding of the subject knowledge. Three basic strategies are not addressed and lacks clarity. No resources are cited to support arguments |
Infographics Visuals and Design (10 marks) |
All Infographic visuals are related to the topic and make it easier to understand. It conveys the clear meaning of the proposed workshop. The visuals add to the content of the infographic. Makes excellent use of font, and colour is consistent and enhances the presentation. |
All infographic visuals relate to the topic and make it clear to understand. The meaning of the workshop provides a very good understanding along with the visuals. Very good use of font, and colour to increase the effects of the presentation. |
The infographic visuals adequately relate to the topic and make it clear to understand. The meaning of the workshop provides adequate understanding along with the visuals. Font style and size along with colour improve the presentation. Minor mistakes in font style and size. |
The infographic visuals provide a basic understanding of the topic. The visuals provide a minimal understanding of the workshop. The font size, style, and colour need major improvement. |
The infographic does not provide any understanding of the topic. The visuals do not clearly represent the objective of the workshop. Lacks consistency in font, size, and colour. Need overall improvement. |
Referencing/ Language and Grammar (5 marks) |
Excellent use of Harvard referencing style with no mistakes. Academic language and writing are well expressed with no grammatical errors. |
Very good use of Harvard referencing style with minimal mistakes. Academic language is very well written with minimal grammatical errors. |
Adequate use of Harvard referencing with noticeable mistakes in style. Written language has noticeable grammatical mistakes. |
Basic use of Harvard referencing style with major mistakes. |
Harvard referencing style not followed. A major improvement is needed in written language and grammar. |