Database Case Study Report

113 views 11:06 am 0 Comments May 18, 2023

Assessment 3, MIS602 1 of 5

ASSESSMENT 3 BRIEF
Subject Code and Title MIS602 Data Modelling and Database Design
Assessment Database Case Study Report
Individual/Group Group
Length N/A
Learning Outcomes The Subject Learning Outcomes demonstrated by successful completion of
the task below include:
a) Examine the role of data in an organisation, and develop solutions
related to the creation, storage and management of
organisational data.
b) Design solutions applying relational database techniques to
complex problems and communicate these solutions to all
stakeholders.
c) Apply contemporary database modelling to identify and address
anomalies in data and recommend solutions.
Submission 12 Week Cycle: Due by 11:55pm AEST/AEDT Sunday end of Module 6.1
(Week 11)
6 Week Cycle: Due by 11:55pm AEST/AEDT Sunday end of Module 6.1
Weighting 35%
Total Marks 100 Marks

Task Summary
This final assessment requires you to produce a robust and a flexible database that is able to accurately store
information about the business mentioned in the case study. You also need to develop the queries and reports to
provide data insights which in turn drive business decisions. Your submission should include:
a) Appropriate modelling plus any business rules or assumptions
b) SQL commands to
physically implement your logical model
populate the database
retrieve meaningful information
c) Visualizations that can be presented at a board meeting
Context
This assignment brings together all the learning gained over the duration of this subject. The skills and knowledge
you’ve gained in this subject forms a vital part of your ability to traverse the major disciplines in the data and database
fields. You will be able to interact with analysts, developers, database administrators and managers using a common
language which is vital if an organization is to function effectively. These skills are the groundwork for further career
progression in data analysis and information management.

Assessment 3, MIS602 2 of 5
Task Instructions
1. Group Formation and Registration
Form groups of 3 members.
The deadline for team registration is 11:45pm AEST Friday end of Module 2.2
To register your team, you are required to send your Learning Facilitator an email with “[MIS602] Group
Registration” in the subject line. In the body of that email, please list the names and student ID numbers of all
the members of your team.
You are required to send the registration email to your facilitator before the registration deadline.
After the registration deadline, those students who are not in a team will be allocated to a group by the
Learning Facilitator.
2. Case Study
Please read the attached MIS602_Assessment 3_Case Study.
3. Database Case Study Report
Based on the information provided in the case study, create a functioning database using MySQL that can be
queried to meet the requirements of the business.
4. The database case study report should include the following elements:
a) ER diagram, relational model and associated business rules and assumptions
b) SQL commands to:
Create tables and Insert sample data rows into each table

SQL queries to provide business insights
At least one of each of the following is required:

SELECT query with a condition
GROUP BY query
JOIN query o NESTED query
For each query explain its business value i.e. what business question does the result answer? Does it
save money/more efficient process?
c) At least two visualizations with an explanation of its business value.
For each visualization explain its business value. E.g. does the visualization highlight savings in time or
money?
Referencing
It is essential that you use appropriate APA style for citing and referencing research. Please see more information on
referencing here
http://library.laureate.net.au/research_skills/referencing
Submission Instructions
1. Graded submission: Group submission
Submit Assessment 3 via the Assessment link in the main navigation menu in MIS602 Data Modelling and
Database Design. On behalf of the team, only one member will submit. The Learning Facilitator will provide
feedback via the Grade Centre in the LMS portal. Feedback can be viewed in My Grades.

2. Peer Evaluation: Individual Submission
Each individual student is to submit a completed team participation score matrix document in the Assessment

3 – Peer Evaluation submission link. Please submit your peer review correctly as no submission may result in a
zero grading for this assessment criteria.

Assessment 3, MIS602 3 of 5
Academic Integrity Declaration
We declare that except where we have referenced, the work we are submitting for this assessment task is our own
work. We have read and are aware of Torrens University Australia Academic Integrity Policy and
Procedure viewable online at
http://www.torrens.edu.au/policies-and-forms
We are aware that we need to keep a copy of all submitted material and their drafts, and we will do so accordingly.
Assessment 3, MIS602 Page 4 of 5
Assessment Rubric

Assessment Criteria Fail
(Unacceptable) 0-
49%
Pass
(Functional)
50-64%
Credit
(Proficient) 65-74%
Distinction
(Advanced)
75 -84%
High Distinction
(Exceptional)
85-100%
ER diagram
Relational model
Associated business
rules and
assumptions
30%
Limited entities and
relationships identified.
Limited entities
converted to tables. No
list of assumptions/
business rules.
Most entities identified and
labelled. Most relationships
identified.
Identified Entities converted
to tables.
Most fields listed. Design
is in third normal
form. List of
assumptions/business rules.
All entities identified and
labelled. All relationships
identified. Most cardinality
is correct. Most
participation is correct.
All entities converted to
tables. All fields listed.
Most many-to-many
relationships
deconstructed into new
tables. Primary keys
correctly underlined.
All relationships
meaningfully labelled.
Primary key labelled for
entities.
All cardinality is correct. All
participation is correct. All
many-to many
relationships
deconstructed into new
tables. Foreign keys
correctly underlined.
Primary keys labelled for
many-to-many
relationships Some non
key fields labelled. Any
multivalued attributes
deconstructed into new
tables. Any self-joins
identified.
Well-presented ER
diagram, relational model,
associated business rules
and assumptions.
SQL commands
45%
Limited number of
queries provided and
queries do not meet
the criteria. Business
statements value not
provided.
Create table DDL SQL
provided. Data insert DML SQL
provided. Minimum number
of queries provided and
queries meets the criteria.
Business statements value
provided.
Queries exhibit extra detail
e.g. column headers
concatenation sorting.
Additional queries
provided. Queries exhibit
extra detail e.g. advanced
filtering calculations join
with more than two
tables.
Additional queries
provided.
All SQL is well formatted.
Overall, well presented.
Visualisation with an
explanation
15%
Minimum visualisations
provided with no
business value
statements.
Minimum visualizations
provided. Business value
statements provided
Axes well labelled.
Legends well labelled. One
visualization is an
aggregation.
Additional visualization
provided. Additional
features utilized e.g.
calculations
Additional visualization
provided. Overall, well
presented visualisation
with an explanation.

Assessment 3, MIS602 Page 5 of 5

Peer Evaluation 10% Showed limited efforts
and contribution to the
team. Other team
completed tasks agreed
for this team member
to ensure project was
finalised.
Has fulfilled part of the agreed
tasks and overlooked others.
Has not initiated tasks or
contributed substantially to
group effort. A passive
member of the group.
Contributed to the group
effort as per agreed tasks
with minimal effort, but
did not go beyond that.
Very valuable member
of the group actively
contributing to the
group effort and
assessment tasks
Peer member of the group
takes initiative and
extensively contributing to
the group assessment
effort.