NUR131 Concepts of Nursing 1: Assessment Task 3, NSP 1, 2023
| Criteria | High Distinction (HD) | Distinction (DN) | Credit (CR) | Pass (PP) | Fail (NN) |
| Explore the role of the nurse in contemporary society. Weighting 40% |
A deep and insightful evaluation of the role of the nurse in contemporary society is shown throughout the paper. Demonstrated by all the following: Seamless integration of Codes and/or Standards, and scholarly literature. Clear explanation of the concepts of profession and discipline, and an analysis of the interrelationship between the two. Well integrated reference to the chosen image. |
A clear evaluation of the role of the nurse in contemporary society is shown throughout the paper. Demonstrated by all the following: Integration of Codes and/or Standards, and scholarly literature. Clear explanation of the concepts of profession and discipline, and an analysis of the interrelationship between the two. Integrated reference to the chosen image. |
A good understanding of the role of the nurse in contemporary society is presented in the paper. Demonstrated by all the following: Reference to Codes and/or Standards, and scholarly literature. Explanation of the concepts of profession and discipline, and an identification of the interrelationship between the two. Reference to the chosen image. |
An understanding of the role of the nurse in contemporary society is presented in the paper. Demonstrated by some of the following: Reference to Codes and/or Standards, and scholarly literature. Explanation of the concepts of profession and discipline, and an identification of the interrelationship between the two. Reference to the chosen image. |
The discussion fails to show evidence of understanding of the role of the nurse in contemporary society. OR Ideas are not supported with evidence from codes and/or standards or scholarly literature. OR No explanation of the concepts of profession and discipline is given AND no link to image evident. |
| Demonstrate developing skills in critical thinking and reflection. Weighting 40% |
New understanding of the topic and of self is demonstrated through insightful analysis of personal ideas, assumptions, and exploration of the origins of these. |
Some new understanding of the topic and self is demonstrated through analysis of personal ideas, assumptions, and exploration of the origins of these. |
Some new understanding of the topic and/or self is demonstrated through identification of personal ideas and assumptions. |
Some new understanding of the topic is demonstrated through identification of personal ideas. |
No new understanding is described OR no attempt is made to identify assumptions OR no reflective element is present in the paper. |
| Adhere to academic presentation requirements. Weighting 20% |
Paper is well-structured and virtually free from punctuation, spelling or grammatical errors. Accurate referencing throughout the paper, both in-text and in the reference list. |
Paper is well-structured with mainly correct spelling and grammar; may have a few small errors. Referencing is correct apart from minor errors either in-text or in reference list. |
Several structural, spelling and/or grammar errors, and/or occasional colloquialisms. Referencing is mainly correct apart from minor errors both in-text and in reference list. |
Several structural, spelling and/or grammar errors, and/or occasional colloquialisms. Referencing is inconsistent, with errors both in-text and in reference list. |
Multiple punctuation, grammar and formatting errors that affect readability; OR written entirely in colloquial style that is inappropriate for academic work; OR uses incorrect / own style of referencing. |