Clinical reasoning in nursing

141 views 11:30 am 0 Comments July 6, 2023

Assessment Information
Value: 50%Marketing Research and Data Analysis
Length: 1500 words
Submission method options: TurnItIn Assignment Portal
Task (this is also in the Subject Outline)
This assessment has two parts, relating directly to the Clinical Reasoning
Cycle.
Clinical reasoning in nursing guides clinical decision making and is essential
to this subject and foundational to your studies.
Part One – State the name of and describe the purpose of each stage of the
Clinical Reasoning Cycle (CRC). Describe how each of these individual stages
helps a Registered Nurse to plan and undertake patient centred care.
Your work must be supported by at least four (4) credible sources* from
relevant literature.
Part Two – Using the Case Study and the Case Study SAGO chart*, gain the
information needed to answer the below questions:
“Consider the Patient Situation” – Identify obvious cues from the case study
and describe the patient’s situation. Describe how the specific information
from this stage guides a Registered Nurse to plan and undertake patient
centred care.
“Collect cues/information” – Identify cues from the case study using the
descriptive words from the CRC of review, gather and recall. Describe how
the specific information from this stage guides a Registered Nurse in making
the correct clinical decisions for a patient.
“Process information” – Identify cues and abnormal assessment
findings from the case study using the descriptive words from the

CRC. Describe how the specific information from this stage guides a
Registered Nurse in making the correct clinical decisions for a patient.
How to write this assessment?
An introduction and conclusion are not required. The presentation
requirements for this assessment can be found below the marking rubric. The
paper must otherwise adhere to all other academic writing standards. See
the
Academic Skills help page.
All sources must be correctly referenced in-text and in the reference list that
must be in accordance with the APA 7th edition referencing style using credible,
reliable, and appropriate sources. Sources should not be older than seven (7)
years and should be published after January 2016.
*Credible, reliable, and appropriate sources include peer reviewed journal
articles, professional manuals, government or professional body documents
and textbooks. Apply the CRAP test to any publications from the internet before
using them, most are best avoided. Also, avoid references to any publication
with no date (N. D.) or information sources directly from the I2 modules.
This assessment is to be word processed using a Word document (eg .doc,
.docx) not PDF or rtf files:
• Leave 2 cm margins and double line space your work;
• Use 12pt font, throughout the entire assessment;
• Include a title page that includes the subject name and code, title of the
assessment task, due date, lecturer’s name, student’s name and student’s
number;
• Insert student name and number in header or footer of every page of every
assessment; and
• Number all pages
Submission is via the TurnItIn Assignment Portal:
Students are able to resubmit (overwrite) the document for this task, up
until the due date – once this date has passed, any submission is final.
Turnitin will generate the originality score instantly for the first THREE
ATTEMPTS, thereafter there is a 24 hour delay to get the score.

On submitting your document, a (green) confirmation text will appear
in your dashboard, allowing you also to download a digital submission
receipt – you can also obtain this receipt at a later time via the options
button, to the right of your submitted file.
Do not use _underscores_ in your file names, as they may prevent the
successful uploading of your document to the Turnitin platform.
Student Declaration
By proceeding with your submission, you are certifying that this assignment is
your own work, based on your personal study and/or research and that you
have acknowledged all material and sources used in its preparation, adhering to
the requirements of academic integrity in accordance with Charles Sturt’s
Academic Integrity Policy.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,