Assignment Brief Academic Year 2022-23
Internal approval: John M, 09/01/23
1
Assignment task |
Students are required to choose an appropriate technological topic relating to digital and new technologies identified and discussed in the lecture series and write a 2,000-word report review on the themes, trends and arguments emerging about that topic. The topic must be agreed with lecturer before detailed research on it has begun. The review should use theories and models set out in the course content and other referenced source material, and course material, and include critical discussion of these from those sources. The report should include: Section 1: Your chosen technological topic (Appx 1000 words) a. Why you deem this topic to be of importance? b. How has this topic developed? c. A detailed description of the technology used in this topic and what it is used for. d. What technological platforms and software are used in the topic? e. What type of business and organisation uses the technology? f. How is it used as a business tool and is this effective? (you may link this to particular industry/sector/profession) Section 2: (Appx 1000 words) How does this relate to course content and discussion on the nature of the relationship between digital technologies and both old and newly emerging theories on business and management structures and practices? The above question can be broken down into addressing these two questions with evidence from your chosen industry: Q1: how the organisations in the chosen industry have understood the implications of this technology and altered what they do and how they do it. Q2: The emergence of brand new organisations, built around digital technology, entering a sector and challenging old style organisations who have failed to grasp the significance of that technology. |
Module code and title: |
BM565 Digital Business & New Technologies |
Module leader: | Dr Muhammad Haque |
Assignment No. and type: |
CW1 Individual 2000-Words Written Report |
Assessment weighting: |
60% |
Submission time and date: |
05/05/2023 by 2 pm | Target feedback time and date: |
3 weeks after submission deadlines |
2
This assignment has been designed to provide you with an opportunity to demonstrate your achievement of the following module learning outcomes: |
LO1: Critically evaluate the role of present and future technologies in the business environment. |
LO 3: Demonstrate an understanding of the significance of digital and new technologies in an ever changing global business environment and the challenges these present to managers. |
Referencing and presentational requirements |
Please reference your work according to the Harvard style as defined in Cite Them Right Online (http://www.citethemrightonline.com). This information is also available in book form: Pears, R. and Shields, G. (2019) Cite them right: the essential reference guide. 11th edn. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Copies are available via the University library. It is an individual assessment, however, since PR1 is group presentation which will be formed based on similar technological topics in CW1 either by the module leader or by group members yourselves. Therefore, you should consider choosing the topic for CW1 similar with the potential group members you want to work with in PR1. The report should consist of 2000 words, (+or – 10%) excluding executive summary, charts, graphics or other research materials, reference list. This material should be referenced and placed into the appendix at the end of the report. The front cover should contain: The module name, course work reference (CW1) and your name and student ID The date the work was completed (note this does not have to be the submission date) The total word count |
Submission details |
This assignment should be submitted electronically using the relevant submission point in the Upload My Assignment section on LSST Connect. Please also note that work that is submitted up to 10 working days beyond the submission date will be considered a late submission. Late submissions will be marked, and the actual mark recorded but will be capped at the pass mark (typically 40%), provided that the work is of a passing standard. Work submitted after this period will not be marked and will be treated as a non-submission. Please ensure that your work has been saved in an appropriate file format. Turnitin will only accept the following file types: Microsoft Word, PowerPoint, PDF. Your file must also contain at least 20 words of text, consist of fewer than 400 pages and be less than 40MB in size. You can submit your work as many times as you like before the submission date. If you do submit your work more than once, your earlier submission will be replaced by the most recent version. Once you have submitted your work, you will receive a digital receipt as proof of submission, which will be sent to your LSST e-mail address. Please keep this receipt for future reference, along with the original electronic copy of your assignment. |
3
Academic integrity |
Academic integrity means taking responsibility for your own work. When you submit an assignment, you are effectively making a declaration that it is your own work and that you have acknowledged the contribution of others and their ideas in its development (for example, by referencing them appropriately). For further information and guidance, please see the University website: https://www.bucks.ac.uk/current students/registry-helpdesk-and-academic-advice/academic-integrity-and-misconduct You are also expected to take responsibility for maintaining and managing confidentiality issues in your work. You should maintain and respect confidentiality in relation to the protection of personal, technical and/or commercial information of a sensitive nature in their assessed work, whatever the format. Confidentiality issues will vary from subject to subject and you are encouraged to seek advice from your course team if you are unclear about requirements in your context. For further information and guidance, please see the University website: https://www.bucks.ac.uk/academic-confidentiality |
Assessment Criteria Academic Year 2022-23
4
Fail | Fail | Pass | Pass | Pass | Pass | Pass | |
0-34 (F) – Fail |
35-39 E – Marginal fail |
40-49 (D) | 50-59 (C) | 60-69 (B) | 70-79 (A) | 80-100 (A+) | |
Not successful | Below required standard |
Satisfactory | Good | Very Good | Excellent | Outstanding | |
Knowledge and Understanding (30%) This should include evidence of: Critical understanding the significance and the detail technology of the chosen technological topic Understanding the types of businesses use this technological topic and the effectiveness of its use |
The work demonstrates a limited and/or substantially inaccurate or no knowledge and critical understanding the significance and the detail technology of the chosen technological topic, the types of businesses use this technological topic and the effectiveness of its use, resulting in poor or no link to techniques with lack of clarity in the writing up. |
The work demonstrates insufficient knowledge and critical understanding the significance and the detail technology of the chosen technological topic, the types of businesses use this technological topic and the effectiveness of its use, resulting in poor or limited link to techniques with lack of clarity in the writing up. |
The work demonstrates a basic knowledge and critical understanding the significance and the detail technology of the chosen technological topic, the types of businesses use this technological topic and the effectiveness of its use |
The work demonstrates a sound breadth and depth knowledge and critical understanding the significance and the detail technology of the chosen technological topic, the types of businesses use this technological topic and the effectiveness of its use |
The work demonstrates refined knowledge and critical understanding the significance and the detail technology of the chosen technological topic, the types of businesses use this technological topic and the effectiveness of its use |
The work demonstrates highly accomplished knowledge and critical understanding the significance and the detail technology of the chosen technological topic, the types of businesses use this technological topic and the effectiveness of its use |
The work demonstrates exceptional knowledge and critical understanding the significance and the detail technology of the chosen technological topic, the types of businesses use this technological topic and the effectiveness of its use |
Analysis and criticality (20%) This should include the evidence of: Coherent linkage and logic argument for |
The work demonstrates a limited or no ability to use of course materials and range of independently selected sources to support investigation into the chosen topic, poor coherent linkage and logic argument |
The work demonstrates an insufficient ability to use of course materials and range of independently selected sources to support investigation into the chosen topic, limited coherent linkage and logic argument |
The work demonstrates a sufficient ability to use of course materials and range of independently selected sources to support investigation into the chosen topic, satisfactory coherent linkage and logic argument |
The work demonstrates a well-developed ability to use of course materials and range of independently selected sources to support investigation into the chosen topic, good coherent linkage and logic argument |
The work demonstrates a sophisticated accomplished ability to use of course materials and range of independently selected sources to support investigation into the chosen topic, very good |
The work demonstrates highly accomplished ability to use of course materials and range of independently selected sources to support investigation into the chosen topic, excellent coherent linkage and logic argument |
The work demonstrates exceptionally accomplished ability to use of course materials and range of independently selected sources to support investigation into the chosen topic, exceptional coherent |
Assessment Criteria Academic Year 2022-23
5
the analysis of a chosen topic Use of course materials and range of independently selected sources |
coherent linkage and logic argument |
linkage and logic argument |
|||||
Application, comparation and evaluation (40%) Critical application of the course content to discuss on the nature of the relationship between digital technologies and both old and newly emerging theories on business and management structure and practices |
Work demonstrates a limited or no ability to compare, evaluate and application of the course content to discuss on the nature of the relationship between digital technologies and both old and newly emerging theories on business and management structure and practices |
Work demonstrates an insufficient ability to compare, evaluate and application of the course content to discuss on the nature of the relationship between digital technologies and both old and newly emerging theories on business and management structure and practices |
Work demonstrates a sufficient ability to compare, evaluate and application of the course content to discuss on the nature of the relationship between digital technologies and both old and newly emerging theories on business and management structure and practices |
Work demonstrates an ability to compare, evaluate and application of the course content to discuss on the nature of the relationship between digital technologies and both old and newly emerging theories on business and management structure and practices in a consistent and informed manner. |
Work demonstrates an ability to compare, evaluate and application of the course content to discuss on the nature of the relationship between digital technologies and both old and newly emerging theories on business and management structure and practices in a capable and effective manner. |
Work demonstrates an ability to compare, evaluate and application of the course content to discuss on the nature of the relationship between digital technologies and both old and newly emerging theories on business and management structure and practices in a highly accomplished manner. |
Work demonstrates an ability to compare, evaluate and application of the course content to discuss on the nature of the relationship between digital technologies and both old and newly emerging theories on business and management structure and practices in an exceptionally accomplished manner. |
Transferable skills (10%) This should include evidence of: Use of Harvard referencing in text and on the reference list. |
Little or no attempt at referencing. No evidence of any attempt to edit into a cohesive document. Poor literacy skills. Too short/too long assignment. |
Major errors noted in the application of the rules of Harvard referencing missing or inaccurate reference list. Weak editing into the final report. Major problems with literacy |
Parts of work adheres to rules of Harvard referencing missing or inaccurate reference list. Fair editing into the final report. Consistency problems with literacy skills. Within 15%-word count. |
Mostly adheres to rules of Harvard referencing in text and in reference list. Good editing into the final report. A few issues with literacy skills at times in a few sections. Within 15%- word count. |
Very good adherence to rules of Harvard referencing in text and in reference list. Very good editing into the final report. Limited problems with literacy skills in any section. Within 15%-word count. |
Excellent adherence to rules of Harvard referencing in text and in reference list. Excellent editing into the final report. No problems with literacy skills in any section. Within 10%-word count. |
Perfect or almost perfect adherence to rules of Harvard Referencing in text and in reference list. Outstanding editing into the final report. No problems with literacy skills in any section. Within 10%-word count. |
Assessment Criteria Academic Year 2022-23
6
Literacy, editing and word count. |
skills. Within 20%-word count. |