ASSIGNMENT INSTRUCTIONS
| Assessment | Briefing document |
| Assessment code: |
010 |
| Academic Year: |
2022/2023 |
| Trimester: | 2 |
| Module Title: | Business Information Systems |
| Module Code: |
MOD003328 |
| Level: | 5 |
| Module Leader: |
Tex Dunstan |
| Weighting: | 60% |
| Word Limit: | 3000 words This excludes bibliography and other items listed in rule 6.75 of the Academic Regulations: http://web.anglia.ac.uk/anet/academic/public/academic_re gs.pdf |
| Assessed Learning Outcomes |
• Analyse the role of the information systems strategy in an organisation, and its integration with overall corporate strategy. • Evaluate appropriate hard and soft factors that impact upon success and failure in the development, roll out and operation of various types of business information systems. |
| Submission Deadline: |
Please refer to the deadline on the VLE |
WRITING YOUR ASSIGNMENT:
• This assignment must be completed individually.
• You must use the Harvard referencing system.
• Your work must indicate the number of words you have used. Written
assignments must not exceed the specified maximum number of words.
When a written assignment is marked, the excessive use of words beyond the
word limit is reflected in the academic judgement of the piece of work which
results in a lower mark being awarded for the piece of work (regulation 6.74).
• Assignment submissions are to be made anonymously. Do not write your
name anywhere on your work.
• Write your student ID number at the top of every page.
• Where the assignment comprises more than one task, all tasks must be
submitted in a single document.
• You must number all pages.
SUBMITTING YOUR ASSIGNMENT:
In order to achieve full marks, you must submit your work before the deadline.
Work that is submitted late – if your work is submitted on the same day as the
deadline by midnight, your mark will receive a 10% penalty. If you submit your
work up to two working days after the published submission deadline – it will be
accepted and marked. However, the element of the module’s assessment to
which the work contributes will be capped with a maximum mark of 40%.
Work cannot be submitted if the period of 2 working days after the deadline has
passed (unless there is an approved extension). Failure to submit within the
relevant period will mean that you have failed the assessment.
Requests for short-term extensions will only be considered in the case of illness
or other cause considered valid by the iCentre Adviser. Please contact
[email protected]. A request must normally be received and agreed by
the iCentre Adviser in writing at least 24 hours prior to the deadline. See rules
6.56-6.65: http://web.anglia.ac.uk/anet/academic/public/academic_regs.pdf
Mitigation: The deadline for submission of mitigation in relation to this assignment
is no later than five working days after the submission date of this work. Please
contact [email protected]
See rules 6.103 – 6.132:
http://web.anglia.ac.uk/anet/academic/public/academic_regs.pdf
ASSIGNMENT BACKGROUND
You have already established a successful business using BIS well.
Your business is based in one of the transportation, food service/catering or
healthcare sectors.
In your group presentation, you have already discussed investment in and
development of cloud services for your products/services to continue the
business performance.
You now need to write a briefing document to show the key issues regarding
blockchain.
ASSIGNMENT QUESTION
Task 1
Identify and evaluate the characteristics and significance globally of blockchain.
(25
marks)
Task 2
Analyse the organisational opportunities and challenges posed to your chosen
| sector by blockchain. marks) |
(40 |
Task 3
Apply Porter’s value chain and/or Rayport & Sviolka’s virtual value chain to
| analyse how value is created and delivered in your business by blockchain. marks) |
(25 |
Task 4
Use correct academic writing style and structure. Use correct grammar, syntax,
punctuation and spelling. Use in-text citations and references according to the
Harvard Reference System. (10 marks)
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA
Evidence of knowledge, understanding and analysis of the role of blockchain in
an organisation and its relationship to corporate strategy.
Evidence of academic and intellectual skills that evaluate appropriate hard and
soft factors that impact upon success and failure in the development, roll out and
operation of business information systems.
Evidence of academic and intellectual skills that successfully apply principles of
blockchain to a specific organisational context.
POINTS TO CONSIDER
• Structure of the briefing document:
1. Introduction – introduce the topic area and explain the scope of work to
be addressed in the briefing document (150 words)
2. Task 1 (750 words)
3. Task 2 (1200 words)
4. Task 3 (750 words)
5. Conclusion to summarise what you have set out in your main section
(150 words)
6. Full list of references in Harvard format.
Your briefing report does not need an executive summary, recommendations
or appendices. Use the sector and business/organisation chosen for the
interim assessment. If you do not, marks will be forfeited.
• Respond to each task by using relevant theories, frameworks and their
application to the BIS development with explanation and analysis. A
critical approach will earn merit.
• Explore relevant blockchain issues in your analysis and application of your
proposals. These may include security, immutability, transparency, IOT,
etc. Be aware of the distinction between blockchain and cryptocurrencies.
• Take a critical approach to your use of Porter’s value chain and/or Rayport
& Sviokla’s virtual value chain. Focus on the technology activity and
explore its relationships selectively with other value creation activities.
• Lectures, tutorials and the VLE materials curate and present a range of
relevant theory to support your BIS development (e.g. value chain, virtual
value chain, IPOS model, generic strategy, five forces analysis, system
theory, three levels of strategy and data-information-knowledge model).
ANGLIA RUSKIN UNIVERSITY GENERIC ASSESSMENT CRITERIA AND MARKING
STANDARDS: LEVEL 5
| Level 5 reflects continuing development from Level 4. At this level students are not fully autonomous but are able to take responsibility for their own learning with some direction. Students are expected to locate an increasingly detailed theoretical knowledge of the discipline within a more general intellectual context, and to demonstrate this through forms of expression which go beyond the merely descriptive or imitative. Students are expected to demonstrate analytical competence in terms both of problem identification and resolution, and to develop their skill sets as required. |
|||
| Mark Bands |
Outcome | Characteristics of Student Achievement by Marking Band for ARU’s Generic Learning Outcomes (Academic Regulations, Section 2) |
|
| Knowledge & Understanding | Intellectual (thinking), Practical, Affective and Transferable Skills |
||
| 90- 100% |
Achieves module outcome(s) |
Exceptional information base exploring and analysing the discipline, its theory and ethical issues with extraordinary originality and autonomy. With some additional effort, work may be considered for internal publication |
Exceptional management of learning resources, with a higher degree of autonomy/ exploration that clearly exceeds the brief. Exceptional structure/accurate expression. Demonstrates intellectual originality and imagination. Exceptional team/practical/professional skills. With some additional effort, work may be considered for internal publication |
| 80- 89% |
Outstanding information base exploring and analysing the discipline, its theory and ethical issues with clear originality and autonomy |
Outstanding management of learning resources, with a degree of autonomy/exploration that clearly exceeds the brief. An exemplar of structured/accurate expression. Demonstrates intellectual originality and imagination. Outstanding team/practical/professional skills |
|
| 70- 79% |
Excellent knowledge base, exploring and analysing the discipline, its theory and ethical issues with considerable originality and autonomy |
Excellent management of learning resources, with a degree of autonomy/exploration that may exceed the brief. Structured/accurate expression. Excellent academic/ intellectual skills and team/practical/professional skills |
|
| 60- 69% |
Good knowledge base; explores and analyses the discipline, its theory and ethical issues with some originality, detail and autonomy |
Good management of learning with consistent self-direction. Structured and mainly accurate expression. Good academic/intellectual skills and team/practical/ professional skills |
|
| 50- 59% |
Sound knowledge base that begins to explore and analyse the theory and ethical issues of the discipline |
Sound use of learning resources. Acceptable structure/accuracy in expression. Sound level of academic/intellectual skills, going beyond description at times. Sound team/practical/professional skills. Inconsistent self-direction |
| 40- 49% |
A marginal pass in module outcome(s) |
Adequate knowledge base with some omissions and/or lack of theory of discipline and its ethical dimension |
Adequate use of learning resources with little self-direction. Some input to teamwork. Some difficulties with academic/intellectual skills. Largely imitative and descriptive. Some difficulty with structure and accuracy in expression, but developing practical/professional skills |
| 30- 39% |
A marginal fail in module outcome(s). Satisfies default qualifying mark |
Limited knowledge base; limited understanding of discipline and its ethical dimension |
Limited use of learning resources, working towards self direction. General difficulty with structure and accuracy in expression. Limited academic/ intellectual skills. Still mainly imitative and descriptive. Team/practical/ professional skills that are not yet secure |
| 20- 29% |
Fails to achieve module outcome(s) Qualifying mark not satisfied. |
Little evidence of an information base. Little evidence of understanding of discipline and its ethical dimension |
Little evidence of use of learning resources. No self direction, with little evidence of contribution to teamwork. Little evidence of academic/intellectual skills and significant difficulties with structure/expression. Very imitative and descriptive. Little evidence of practical/professional skills |
| 10- 19% |
Deficient information base. Deficient understanding of discipline and its ethical dimension |
Deficient use of learning resources. No attempt at self direction with inadequate contribution to teamwork. Deficient academic/intellectual skills and major difficulty with structure/expression. Wholly imitative and descriptive. Deficient practical/professional skills |
|
| 1- 9% |
No evidence of any information base. No understanding of discipline and its ethical dimension |
No evidence of use of learning resources of understanding of self-direction with no evidence of contribution to teamwork. No evidence academic/ intellectual skills and incoherent structure/ expression. No evidence of practical/professional skills |
|
| 0% | Awarded for: (i) non-submission; (ii) dangerous practice and; (iii) in situations where the student fails to address the assignment brief (eg: answers the wrong question) and/or related learning outcomes |