Assessment Task 1 - Australia Assignments

1
8905EDN
Assessment Task 1 Rubric

Criteria	Outstanding 100-85	Very High 84-75	High 74-65	Satisfactory 64-50	Unsatisfactory 49-45	Limited 44-25 Very limited 24-1
Demonstrates understanding of, and critical insight into, the selected research methodology and implications of research principles	Methodology is insightfully explained in light of the research principles and philosophy and processes of the selected approach. An extensive range of implications is considered.	Methodology is well explained in light of the research principles and philosophy and processes of the selected approach. A range of implications is considered.	Methodology is logically explained in light of the research principles and philosophy and processes of the selected approach. Some implications are considered.	Methodology is explained generally in light of the research principles and philosophy and processes of the selected approach. A few implications are considered.	Methodology is unevenly explained in light of the research principles and philosophy and processes of the selected approach. Very few implications are considered.	Methodology is poorly explained in light of the research principles and philosophy and processes of the selected approach. Very few or no implications are considered.
Shows engagement with the scholarly literature relating to the selected research methodology	Response demonstrates evidence of critical reading of relevant and complex research literature to support the discussion.	Response demonstrates evidence of wide and deep reading of relevant and current research literature to support the discussion.	Response demonstrates evidence of wide reading of relevant research literature to support the discussion.	Response demonstrates evidence of reading of relevant research literature to support the discussion.	Some research literature mentioned but connections are unclear.	Little consideration of research literature. Response is often unclear or unconnected to theory/context.
Demonstrates understanding of key methods for data collection/analysis aligned with the methodology	Logically connects methodology, methods and paradigms with highly relevant discussion and examples.	Logically connects methodology, methods and paradigms with relevant discussion and examples.	Logically connects methodology, methods and paradigms with discussion and examples.	Is able to connect methodology, methods and paradigms as part of the discussion.	Is sometimes able to connect methodology, methods in the discussion.	Is rarely to connect methodology, methods and paradigms. Significant misunderstandings of methodology and theoretical connections.
Presents critical analysis of research methodology and	Three papers have been identified and critically analysed with insightful connections	Three papers have been appropriately selected and critically analysed with useful	Three papers have been appropriately selected and analysed with some connections	Three papers have been appropriately selected and explained with a few connections	While there is evidence of understanding of one or both chosen methodologies in the	Misunderstanding of the selected methodology is

Criteria	Outstanding 100-85	Very High 84-75	High 74-65	Satisfactory 64-50	Unsatisfactory 49-45	Limited 44-25 Very limited 24-1
methods reported in three scholarly papers	to literature associated with the methodology and associated methods.	connections to literature associated with the methodology and associated methods.	to literature associated with the methodology and associated methods.	to literature associated with the methodology and associated methods.	papers, links are not made to supporting literature or theory.	evident in the evaluations. Papers have been poorly selected or not sufficiently analysed. Little/no evidence of connection to the methodological field.
Demonstrates academic and English literacy	Writing is scholarly, clear, engaging, and error free. References accurately reflect APA 7 in all instances.	Writing is scholarly and clear, with no or few errors. References accurately reflect APA 7 in almost all instances.	Writing is scholarly and clear few errors. References accurately reflect APA 6 7 in most instances.	Writing is generally clear, logical and well structured. References mostly conform to APA 7.	Writing is not always scholarly or clear, and there are errors. References do not accurately reflect APA 7.	Writing is difficult to follow because of structural or grammatical problems. References rarely reflect APA 7.