NUR134 Assessment 3 Rubric – Health Promotion Plan Overall weighting: 35%
Task: Identify a health issue/concern and provide justification using epidemiological data to explain why this issue/concern is a national health priority.
Analyse the contributing factors for this health issue/concern and map out a health promotion plan to potentially address or mitigate these.
Select one potential health promotion intervention/activity you have identified to describe in detail, including how evaluation of this intervention could be undertaken.
Minimum of 5 academic references to be cited.
Task Length: 1000 words
| Criterion Description | HD | DN | CR | PP | NN |
| Epidemiological data is used to explain why the health issue/concern identified is a national health priority (Weighting 20%) |
• Comprehensive discussion of why this issue is considered a national health priority • Extensive use of epidemiological data to support discussion |
• Thorough discussion of why this issue is considered a national health priority • Expansive use of epidemiological data to support discussion |
• Detailed discussion of why this issue is considered a national health priority • Broad use of epidemiological data to support discussion |
•Basic discussion of why this issue is considered a national health priority • Incorporates epidemiological data to support discussion |
• Unclear why this issue is considered a national health priority • Epidemiological data is not used support discussion or used ineffectively |
| Factors that contribute to the health issue/concern identified are analysed, with consideration of relevant social determinants, to develop a health promotion plan in response that will improve health equity. (Weighting 40%) |
• Identification and discussion of numerous factors including relevant social determinants that contribute to the health issue •The goal for a health promotion response to the health issue is clearly articulated. • A minimum of 3 objectives are developed to achieve the health promotion goal clearly |
• Identification and discussion of a range factors including relevant social determinants that contribute to the health issue • The goal for a health promotion response to the health issue is clearly articulated. • A minimum of 3 objectives are developed to achieve the health promotion goal clearly |
• Identification and discussion of several factors including relevant social determinants that contribute to the health issue • The goal for a health promotion response to the health issue is clearly articulated. • A minimum of 3 objectives are developed to achieve the health promotion goal clearly |
• Identification and discussion of a few factors including relevant social determinants that contribute to the health issue • The goal for a health promotion response to the health issue is articulated. • A minimum of 2 objectives are developed to achieve the health promotion goal clearly |
• Limited identification and discussion of factors including relevant social determinants that contribute to the health issue • The goal for a health promotion response to the health issue is not articulated. • Less than 2 objectives are developed to achieve the health promotion goal |
| relate to key contributing factors •A minimum of 2 strategies for a health promotion activity are proposed to achieve each objective and appropriately linked to an action area of the Ottawa Charter |
relate to key contributing factors •A minimum of 2 strategies for a health promotion activity are proposed to achieve each objective and appropriately linked to an action area of the Ottawa Charter |
relate to key contributing factors •A minimum of 2 strategies for health a promotion activity are identified to achieve each objective and appropriately linked to an action area of the Ottawa Charter |
relate to key contributing factors •A minimum of 2 strategies for a health promotion activity are identified to achieve each objective and appropriately linked to an action area of the Ottawa Charter |
clearly relate to key contributing factors •Less than 2 strategies for a health promotion activity are identified to achieve each objective and/or are not appropriately linked to an action area of the Ottawa Charter |
A detailed summary of a proposed health promotion intervention activity is described, including details of how this activity will be evaluated. (Weighting 30%) |
• Comprehensive discussion explaining how one of the strategies proposed would be implemented. • The type of evaluation and plan for assessing the success of the implementation of the proposed strategy and how this will be achieved is thoroughly explained. |
• Detailed discussion explaining how one of the strategies proposed would be implemented. • The type of evaluation and plan for assessing the success of the implementation of the proposed strategy and how this will be achieved is explained in detail. |
• Detailed discussion outlining how one of the strategies proposed would be implemented. • The type of evaluation and plan for assessing the success of the implementation of the proposed strategy and how this will be achieved, is broadly explained. |
• The discussion outlines how one of the strategies proposed would be implemented. • The type of evaluation and plan for assessing the success of the implementation of the proposed strategy and how this will be achieved, is explained. |
• The discussion outlining how one of the strategies proposed would be implemented is unclear or absent. • The type of evaluation and plan for assessing the success of the implementation of the proposed strategy and how this will be achieved is not clearly explained or inappropriate. |
| Adhere to academic presentation requirements (Weighting 10%) |
• Demonstrated good planning; with correct spelling and grammar, and appropriate terminology used throughout • Provided a comprehensive reference list and accurately referenced all sources |
• Demonstrated good planning, with correct spelling and grammar, and appropriate terminology used throughout • Accurately referenced quality sources using the Harvard referencing style |
• Minimal spelling or grammatical errors, and mostly suitable use of terminology • Accurately referenced sources using the Harvard referencing style |
• Some incorrect spelling, grammar and/or terminology • Some errors in the application of Harvard referencing style |
• Did not present information in an academic style, with numerous spelling, grammatical and/or terminology errors • Used an incorrect referencing style or made a large number of referencing errors. |
| using the Harvard referencing style |