ASSESSMENT 2 RUBRIC - Australia Assignments

©Australian Institute of Business Term 1 2023
8003SHRM RUBRIC

ASSESSMENT 2 RUBRIC: WRITTEN REPORT
Key Components	HD (100–85%)	D (84–75%) C (74–65%) P (64–50%)	F (49–0%)
Criterion 1 Description of the organisation – the student provides background information of the organisation. 10%	The student provides excellent background information of the organisation.	The student provides very good background information of the organisation.	The student provides good background information of the organisation.	The student provides some background information of the organisation.	The student provides wrong or no background information of the organisation.
Criterion 2 Understanding of the relevant HRM theories and concepts – the student demonstrates relevant understanding and knowledge of HRM theories and concepts 30%	The student demonstrates excellent understanding and knowledge of the relevant HRM theories and concepts.	The student demonstrates very good understanding and knowledge of the relevant HRM theories and concepts.	The student demonstrates good understanding and knowledge of the relevant HRM theories and concepts.	The student demonstrates little understanding and knowledge of the relevant HRM theories and concepts.	The student demonstrates wrong or no understanding and knowledge of the relevant HRM theories and concepts.
Criterion 3 Analysis and evaluation – the student provides relevant examples. The student analyses and evaluates the HRM issue and provides a logical conclusion. 35%	The student provides highly relevant examples. The student provides excellent analysis, evaluation and application of the HRM issue. The student provides good evidence to support their discussion including a proper logical conclusion.	The student provides appropriate and relevant examples. The student provides very good analysis, evaluation and application of the HRM issue. The student provides sufficient evidence to support their discussion including a proper logical conclusion.	The student provides appropriate examples. The student provides good analysis, evaluation and application of the HRM issue. The student provides adequate evidence to support their discussion including an appropriate logical conclusion.	The student provides a few examples. The student provides little analysis, evaluation and application of the HRM issue. The student provides little evidence to support their discussion. The conclusion has some but very limited logical discussion.	The student provides wrong or no examples. The student provides mostly descriptive information with a few traces of evaluation and application of the HRM issue. The evidence provided is unconnected to the discussion. The conclusion is also unconnected to discussion

Key Components	HD (100–85%)	D (84–75%)	C (74–65%)	P (64–50%)	F (49–0%)
Criterion 4 Recommendations and justification – the student provides sound recommendations and justification. 15%	The student provides excellent recommendations and justification which has a strong connection to the discussion.	The student provides very good recommendations and justification which has a good connection to the discussion.	The student provides good recommendations and justification which is appropriately connected to the discussion.	The student provides minimum recommendations and justification.	The student provides very little or no recommendations and justifications. However, it is not related to the discussion.
Criterion 5 Citation and referencing – the student provides quality citations and references and adheres to the author date referencing convention. 5%	The student provides quality references from credible sources and fully adheres to the author-date referencing style.	The student provides a very good number of references with reasonable quality and fully adheres to the author date referencing style.	The student provides a good number of references and fully adheres to the author-date referencing style.	The student provides some sources of facts and/or theory, assignment demonstrates limited understanding of an author-date referencing style	The student provides a few or no citations and references but does not adhere to the author-date referencing style.
Criterion 6 Structure, presentation and communication – the student uses relevant structure, presents the content appropriately and writes academically. The writing is clear, free of grammatical or spelling mistakes and within the word count 5%	The student provides excellent structure and presents the content very clearly. Writes very clearly and academically. The writing is completely free of any grammatical and spelling mistakes. Within required word count.	The student provides very good structure and presents the content with clarity. Writes clearly and academically. The writing is free of grammatical and spelling mistakes. Within required word count.	The student provides good structure and presents the content appropriately. Writes clearly. The writing has occasional grammatical and spelling mistakes. Within required word count.	The student provides appropriate structure with some level of consistency. Writes with some clarity. The writing has a few grammatical and spelling mistakes. Word count under or over the limit.	The student provides inconsistent/ wrong structure which lacks a logical flow. Writes with very little or no clarity. The writing has major grammatical and spelling mistakes. Word count under or over the limit.