See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/340115931
Artificial Intelligence (AI) Ethics: Ethics of AI and Ethical AI
Article in Journal of Database Management · March 2020
DOI: 10.4018/JDM.2020040105
CITATIONS
26
READS
13,875
2 authors, including:
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
Supply Chain Management View project
Keng Siau
Missouri University of Science and Technology
516 PUBLICATIONS 9,623 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
All content following this page was uploaded by Keng Siau on 10 April 2020.
The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.
DOI: 10.4018/JDM.2020040105
Journal of Database Management
Volume 31 • Issue 2 • April-June 2020
Copyright©2020,IGIGlobal.CopyingordistributinginprintorelectronicformswithoutwrittenpermissionofIGIGlobalisprohibited.
74
Artifcial Intelligence (AI) Ethics:
Ethics of AI and Ethical AI
Keng Siau, Missouri University of Science and Technology, Rolla, USA
Weiyu Wang, Missouri University of Science and Technology, Rolla, USA
ABSTRACT
Artificialintelligence(AI)-basedtechnologyhasachievedmanygreatthings,suchasfacialrecognition,
medical diagnosis, and self-driving cars. AI promises enormous benefits for economic growth,
socialdevelopment,aswellashumanwell-beingandsafetyimprovement.However,thelow-levelof
explainability,databiases,datasecurity,dataprivacy,andethicalproblemsofAI-basedtechnology
posesignificantrisksforusers,developers,humanity,andsocieties.AsAIadvances,onecritical
issueishowtoaddresstheethicalandmoralchallengesassociatedwithAI.Eventhoughtheconcept
of“machineethics”wasproposedaround2006,AIethicsisstillintheinfancystage.AIethicsis
thefieldrelatedtothestudyofethicalissuesinAI.ToaddressAIethics,oneneedstoconsiderthe
ethicsofAIandhowtobuildethicalAI.EthicsofAIstudiestheethicalprinciples,rules,guidelines,
policies,andregulationsthatarerelatedtoAI.EthicalAIisanAIthatperformsandbehavesethically.
OnemustrecognizeandunderstandthepotentialethicalandmoralissuesthatmaybecausedbyAI
toformulatethenecessaryethicalprinciples,rules,guidelines,policies,andregulationsforAI(i.e.,
EthicsofAI).WiththeappropriateethicsofAI,onecanthenbuildAIthatexhibitsethicalbehavior
(i.e.,EthicalAI).ThispaperwilldiscussAIethicsbylookingattheethicsofAIandethicalAI.
WhataretheperceivedethicalandmoralissueswithAI?Whatarethegeneralandcommonethical
principles,rules,guidelines,policies,andregulationsthatcanresolveoratleastattenuatetheseethical
andmoralissueswithAI?Whataresomeofthenecessaryfeaturesandcharacteristicsofanethical
AI?HowtoadheretotheethicsofAItobuildethicalAI?
KEywoRDS
AI Ethics, Artificial Intelligence, Ethical AI, Ethics, Ethics of AI, Machine Ethics, Roboethics
1. INTRoDUCTIoN
Someresearchersandpractitionersbelievethatartificialintelligence(AI)isstillalongwayfrom
havingconsciousnessandbeingcomparabletohumans,andconsequently,thereisnorushtoconsider
ethicalissues.ButAI,combinedwithothersmarttechnologiessuchasrobotics,hasalreadyshown
itspotentialinbusiness,healthcare,transportation,andmanyotherdomains.Further,AIapplications
arealreadyimpactinghumanityandsociety.Autonomousvehiclescanreplacealargenumberof
jobs,andtransformthetransportationandassociatedindustries.Forexample,short-haulflightsand
Journal of Database Management
Volume 31 • Issue 2 • April-June 2020
75
hospitalityservicesalonghighwayswillbeimpactedifdriverlesscarsenablepassengerstosleep
andworkduringthejourney.AI-recruitersareknowntoexhibithumanbiasesbecausethetraining
datainheritsthesamebiaseswehaveashumans.Thewealthgapcreatedbythewideningdifferences
betweenreturnoncapitalandreturnonlaborisposedtocreatesocialunrestandupheavals.The
futureofworkandfutureofhumanitywillbeaffectedbyAIandplansneedtobeformulatedandput
inplace.BuildingAIethicallyandhavingethicalAIareurgentandcritical.Unfortunately,building
ethicalAIisanenormouslycomplexandchallengingtask.
1.1. what is Ethics?
Ethicsisacomplex,complicated,andconvolutedconcept.Ethicscanbedefinedasthemoralprinciples
governingthebehaviorsoractionsofanindividualoragroupofindividuals(Nalini,2019).Inother
words,ethicsareasystemofprinciplesorrulesorguidelinesthathelpdeterminewhatisgoodor
right.Broadlyspeaking,ethicscanbedefinedasthedisciplinedealingwithrightversuswrong,and
themoralobligationsanddutiesofentities(e.g.,humans,intelligentrobots,etc.).
Ethicshasbeenstudiedbymanyresearchersfromdifferentdisciplines.Mosthumansarefamiliar
withvirtueethicssinceveryyoungbecauseitisabehaviorguideinstilledbyparentsandteachersto
helpchildrenpracticegoodconduct.Aristotle(Yu,1998)believeswhenapersonactsinaccordance
withvirtue,thispersonwilldowellandbecontent.Virtueethicsispartofnormativeethics,which
studieswhatmakesactionsrightorwrong.Itcanbeviewedasoverarchingmoralprinciplesthathelp
peopleresolvedifficultmoraldecisions.Astheinteractionbetweenhumans,betweenhumansand
animals,betweenhumansandmachines,andevenbetweenmachinesisincreasing,ethicaltheories
have been applied to real-life situations, such as business ethics, animal ethics, military ethics,
bioethics,andmachineethics.Thestudyofethicsandethicalprinciplesisconstantlyevolvingand
developing.Table1listsseveralethicsdefinitionsgivenbyresearchers.
InthecontextofAI,theethicsofAIspecifiesthemoralobligationsanddutiesofanAIandits
creators.Researchershavedonemuchworkstudyinghumanethicalissues.Manyethicalframeworks
canbeusedtodirecthumanbehaviors,suchasactionsandactivitiesrelatedtorespectforindividuals,
Table 1. Definition of ethics
Normative Ethics | Reference |
Ethicsisthecapacitytothinkcriticallyaboutmoralvaluesanddirectouractionsin termsofsuchvalues. |
Churchill,1999 |
Ethicsisasetofconceptsandprinciplesthatguideusindeterminingwhatbehavior helpsorharmssentientcreatures. |
Paul&Elder,2006 |
Ethicsisthenormforconductthatdistinguishesbetweenacceptableand unacceptablebehavior. Ethicsisthedisciplinethatstudiesstandardsofconduct,suchasphilosophy, theology,law,psychology,orsociology. Ethicsisamethod,procedure,orperspectivefordecidinghowtoactandfor analyzingcomplexproblemsandissues. |
Resnik,2011 |
Applied Ethics | |
Computerethicsistheanalysisofthenatureandsocialimpactofcomputer technologyandthecorrespondingformulationandjustificationofpoliciesforthe ethicaluseofsuchtechnology. |
Moor,1985,p.266 |
Machineethicsisconcernedwithgivingmachinesethicalprinciplesoraprocedure fordiscoveringawaytoresolvetheethicaldilemmastheymightencounter,enabling themtofunctioninanethicallyresponsiblemannerthroughtheirownethical decisionmaking. |
AndersonandAnderson,2011, p.1 |
Journal of Database Management
Volume 31 • Issue 2 • April-June 2020
76
beneficence,justice,privacy,accuracy,ownership/property,accessibility,fairness,accountability,
andtransparency(Wang&Siau,2018).
Oneofthebest-knownethicalframeworksisdevelopedbyKenBlanchardandNormanVincent
Peale(Blanchard&Peale,2011).Theframeworkconsistsofthreemainquestions:Isitlegal?Is
itfair?Howdoesitmakemefeel?AnotherframeworkistheMarkkulaCenterFramework,which
identifiesfiveapproachestodealingwithethicalissues,includingtheutilitarianismapproach,rights
approach, fairness or justice approach, common good approach, and virtue approach (Markkula
CenterforAppliedEthics,2015).
AIethics,however,isarelativelynewfieldandthesubsequentpartsofthepaperwilldiscuss
theAIethics–ethicsofAIandethicalAI.
1.2. what is “Ethics of AI” and “Ethical AI”?
TheethicsofAIispartoftheethicsofadvancedtechnologythatfocusesonrobotsandotherartificially
intelligentagents.Itcanbedividedintoroboethics(robotethics)andmachineethics.
Roboethicsisconcernedwiththemoralbehaviorsofhumansastheydesign,construct,use,and
interactwithAIagents,andtheassociatedimpactsofrobotsonhumanityandsociety.Inthispaper,
weconsideritasethicsofAI,whichdealwithethicalissuesrelatedtoAI,includingethicalissues
thatmayarisewhendesigninganddevelopingAI(e.g.,humanbiasesthatexistindata,dataprivacy,
andtransparency),andethicalissuescausedbyAI(e.g.,unemploymentandwealthdistribution).
Further,asmachinesbecomemoreintelligentandmayonedaygainconsciousness,weshouldconsider
robotrights–theconceptthatpeopleshouldhavemoralobligationstowardsintelligentmachines.It
issimilartohumanrightsandanimalrights.Forinstance,whetheritisethicaltodeployintelligent
militaryrobotstodangerousbattlefieldsorassignrobotstodirtyenvironments.Therightsofliberty,
freedomofexpression,equality,andhavingthoughtandemotionbelongtothiscategory.
MachineethicsdealswiththemoralbehaviorsofArtificialMoralAgents(AMAs),whichis
thefieldofresearchaddressingthedesignofartificialmoralagents.Astechnologyadvancesand
robotsbecomemoreintelligent,robotsorartificiallyintelligentagentsshouldbehavemorallyand
exhibitmoralvalues.WeconsidertheethicalbehaviorsofAIagentsasethicalAI.Currently,the
bestknownproposedrulesforgoverningAIagentsaretheThreeLawsofRoboticsputforthbyIssac
Asimovinthe1950s(Asimov,1950).FirstLaw,arobotmaynotinjureahumanbeingor,through
inaction,allowahumanbeingtocometoharm.SecondLaw,arobotmustobeytheordersgivento
itbyhumanbeingsexceptwhensuchorderswouldconflictwiththeFirstLaw.ThirdLaw,arobot
mustprotectitsexistenceaslongassuchprotectiondoesnotconflictwiththeFirstorSecondLaw.
Table2depictsthetwodimensionsofAIethics(i.e.,ethicsofAIandethicalAI)andhowthe
twodimensionsinteractwithAI,Human,andSociety.TheethicalinteractionbetweenAIsisnew
inthispaper.ThisisespeciallyimportantforAIswithconsciousness.NotonlyshouldtheAIsdo
noharmtohumansandself-preserve,butitalsoshoulddonoharmtootherintelligentagents.
Thus,theThreeLawsofRoboticsmayneedtobeextendedtotakeintoaccounttheinteraction
betweenintelligentAIs.
UnderstandingtheethicsofAIwillhelptoestablishaframeworkforbuildingethicalAI.Figure
1showstheinitialframeworkforbuildingethicalAI.
Table 2. AI ethics
AI | Human | Society |
EthicsofAI EthicalAI |
PrinciplesofdevelopingAIto interactwithotherAIsethically HowAIshouldinteractwith otherAIsethically? |
PrinciplesofdevelopingAIto interactwithhumanethically PrinciplesofdevelopingAIto functionethicallyinsociety |
HowAIshouldinteractwith humansethically? |
HowAIshouldoperate ethicallyinsociety? |
Journal of Database Management
Volume 31 • Issue 2 • April-June 2020
77
1.3. why Should we Build Ethical AI?
Recently,CriminalsusedAI-basedvoicetechnologytoimpersonateachiefexecutive’svoiceand
demandafraudulenttransferof$243,000(Stupp,2019).Thisisnotanisolatedincident.PINDROP
reporteda350%riseinvoicefraudbetween2013and2017(Livni,2019).AIvoiceimpersonation
beingusedforfraudisnottheonlyconcern.Deepfake,whichisanapproachtosuperimposeand
synthesizeexistingimagesandvideosontosourceimagesorvideosusingMachineLearning(ML),is
alsobecomingcommon.Withdeepfake,humanfacescouldbesuperimposedonpornographicvideo
contentandpoliticalleaderscanbeportrayedinvideostoinciteviolenceandpanic.Deepfakemay
alsobeusedintheelectioncycletoinfluenceandbiastheAmericanelectorate(Libby,2019).In2017,
researchersfromtheUniversityofWashingtoncreatedasyntheticObama,usinganeuralnetwork
AItomodeltheshapeofObama’smouth(BBCNews,2017).Althoughtherewasnosecuritythreat
fromtheUniversityofWashingtonexperiment,thedemonstrationillustrateswhatispossiblewith
AI-alteredvideos.Fakenewsisanotherconcern.Forexample,anAIfaketextgeneratorwasdeemed
toodangeroustobereleasedbyitscreators,OpenAI,forfearofmisuse.Undoubtedly,advancedAI
agentscouldputindividuals,companies,andsocietiesatincreasedrisk.
Humanrights,suchasprivacy,freedomofassociation,freedomofspeech,righttowork,nondiscrimination,andaccesstopublicservices,shouldalwaysbeputinthefirstplace.However,the
growinguseofAIinthecriminaljusticesystemmayhaveadiscriminationconcern.Therecidivism
risk-scoringsoftwareusedacrossthecriminaljusticesystemshowsincidentsofdiscrimination
basedonrace,gender,andethnicity.Forinstance,somedefendantsarefalselylabeledashighrisk
becauseoftheirethnicity.
Therighttoprivacy,whichisessentialtohumandignity,canalsobeaffectedbyAI.Asbigdata
technologydeveloped,thecollectionofdatainterfereswiththerightstoprivacyanddatasecurity.
Forinstance,MLmodelscanaccuratelysynthesizedataandestimatepersonalcharacteristics,such
asgender,age,maritalstatus,andoccupation,fromcellphonelocationdata.Anotherexampleis
governmentsurveillance.IntheU.S.,halfofalladultsarealreadyinlawenforcementfacialrecognition
databases(Telcher,2018),whichthreatenstoendanonymity.Rightstofreedomofexpression,
assembly,andassociationmayaccordinglybeaffected.Lastbutnotleast,therighttoworkandan
adequatestandardofliving(AccessNow,2018)wouldbeaffected.Automationhasresultedinjobloss
andjobdisplacementincertainindustriesandtherapidadvancementinAIwouldacceleratethistrend.
2. REVIEw oF ETHICAL GUIDELINES, FRAMEwoRKS, AND PRINCIPLES
AdvancedAIwillsparkunprecedentedbusinessgains,butalongtheway,governmentandindustry
leaderswillhavetograpplewithasmorgasbordofethicaldilemmassuchasdataprivacyissues,
machine learning bias, public safety concerns, as well as job replacement and unemployment
rateproblems.Toguidetheirstrategiesindeveloping,adopting,andembracingAItechnologies,
organizationsshouldconsiderestablishingAIethicsframeworks/guidelines.Someinstitutionshave
startedworkonthisissueandpublishedsomeguidelines.Table3showseightinstitutionsthatwork
onAIethicalframeworksorprinciplesandtheirobjectives.Table4showsthecontentofthoseethical
frameworksandprinciples.
Figure 1. Initial framework for building ethical AI
Journal of Database Management
Volume 31 • Issue 2 • April-June 2020
78
InTable5,wesummarizedthefrequencyofeachfactorinthoseframeworksshowninTable
4.Wecanseethatdifferentframeworksmayincludethesameorsimilarfactors,butalsoinclude
differentconsiderations.ThestudyofethicalissuesofAIisstillanewareaandmorediscussionis
neededtofinallyestablishtheframeworkofbuildingethicalAI.Inthenextsection,wewilldiscuss
eachethicalissueindetail.
3. REVIEw oF ETHICAL ISSUES IN AI
AI,atthepresentstage,isreferredtoasNarrowAIorWeakAI.WeakAIcandowellinanarrow
andspecializeddomain.TheperformanceofnarrowAIdependsmuchonthetrainingdataand
programming,whichiscloselyrelatedtobigdataandhumans.TheethicalissuesofNarrowAI,
thus,involvehumanfactors.
“Adifferentsetofethicalissuesariseswhenwecontemplatethepossibilitythatsomefuture
AIsystemsmightbecandidatesforhavingthemoralstatus”(BostromandYudkowsky,2014,p.5).
Table 3. Institutions’ works on AI ethics and their objectives
Resource | Objective |
FutureofLifeInstitute (2017) |
Thisreportemphasizes“donoharm”.ItrequiresthedevelopmentofAItobenefitsociety, fostertrustandcooperation,andavoidcompetitiveracing. |
International AssociationofPrivacy Professionals(IAPP, 2018) |
Theproposedframeworkexploresriskstoprivacy,fairness,transparency,equality,and manyotherissuesthatcanbeamplifiedbybigdataandartificialintelligence.They provideanoverviewofhoworganizationscanoperatedataethicsandhowtoreflectethical considerationsindecisionmaking. |
InstituteofElectrical andElectronics Engineers(IEEE, 2019) |
TheproposeddesignlaysoutpracticesforsettingupAIgovernancestructure,including pragmatictreatmentofdatamanagement,affectivecomputing,economics,legalaffairs,and otherareas.Onekeypriorityistoincreasehumanwell-beingasametricforAIprogress. Besides,theIEEEprinciplerequireseveryoneinvolvedinthedesignanddevelopmentofAIis educatedtoprioritizeethicalconsiderations. |
ThePublicVoice (2018) |
TheproposedguidelinesaimtoimprovethedesignanduseofAI,maximizethebenefits ofAI,protecthumanrights,andminimizerisksandthreatsassociatedwithAI.Theyclaim thattheguidelinesshouldbeincorporatedintoethicalstandards,adoptedinnationallawand internationalagreements,andbuiltintothedesignofsystems. |
European Commission’sHigh LevelExpertGroup onAI(European Commission,2019) |
TheguidelinesaredesignedtoguidetheAIcommunityinthedevelopmentanduseof “trustworthyAI”(i.e.,AIthatislawful,ethical,androbust).Theguidelinesemphasizefour principles:respectforhumanautonomy,preventionofharm,fairness,andexplicability. |
AI4People(Floridiet al.,2018) |
ThisframeworkintroducesthecoreopportunitiesandrisksofAIforsociety;presenta synthesisoffiveethicalprinciplesthatshouldundergirditsdevelopmentandadoption;and offer20concreterecommendations—toassess,todevelop,toincentivize,andtosupport goodAI—whichinsomecasesmaybeundertakendirectlybynationalorsupranational policymakers. |
UnitedNations Educational, Scientific,and CulturalOrganization (UNESCO,2017) |
Theproposedethicalprincipleaimstoprovidedecision-makerswithcriteriathatextend beyondpurelyeconomicconsiderations. |
Australia’sEthics Framework(Dawsonet al.,2019) |
Thisethicsframeworkhighlightstheethicalissuesthatareemergingorlikelytoemergein AustraliafromAItechnologiesandoutlinestheinitialstepstowardmitigatingthem.Thegoal ofthisdocumentistoprovideapragmaticassessmentofkeyissuestohelpfosterethicalAI developmentinAustralia. |
Journal of Database Management
Volume 31 • Issue 2 • April-June 2020
79
Theyadoptthedefinitionofmoralstatusthat“Xhasmoralstatus=becauseXcountsmorallyinits
ownright,itispermissible/impermissibletodothingstoitforitsownsake.”Fromthisperspective,
onceAIhasmoralstatus,weshouldtreatitnotasamachine/system,butanobjectthathasequal
rightsashumans.Thetechnologicalsingularity,whentechnologicalgrowthbecomesuncontrollable
andirreversible,ishypothesizedtocomeasAIadvances.Ifithappens,humancivilizationwould
beaffected,androbotrightsandconsciousnessshouldbeconsidered.Buttheseissuesarebeyond
theconsiderationofthispaper.Thefollowingdiscussionmainlyfocusesonethicalissuesrelated
tonarrowAI.
ResearchonethicalissuesofAIfallsintothreecategories:featuresofAIthatmaygiveriseto
ethicalproblems(Timmermansetal.,2010),humanfactorsthatcauseethicalrisks(Larson,2017),
andsocialimpactofethicalAIissues.
3.1. Features of AI Give Rise to Ethical Issues
3.1.1. Transparency
Machinelearningisabrillianttool,butitishardtoexplaintheinnerprocessingofmachine
learning, which is usually called the “black box”. The “black box” makes the algorithms
mysteriouseventoitscreators.Thislimitspeople’sabilitytounderstandthetechnology,leads
tosignificantinformationasymmetriesamongAIexpertsandusers,andhindershumantrust
inthetechnologyandAIagents.Trustiscrucialinallkindsofrelationshipsandaprerequisite
reasonforacceptance(Siau&Wang,2018).
Table 4. Ethical frameworks and principles from eight institutions
Resource | Ethical Framework/Principle |
FutureofLifeInstitute(2017) | Safety,FailureTransparency,JudicialTransparency,Responsibility,Value Alignment,HumanValues,PersonalPrivacy,LibertyandPrivacy,Shared Benefit,SharedProsperity,HumanControl,Non-subversion,AIArmsRace |
InternationalAssociationofPrivacy Professionals(IAPP,2018) |
Dataethics,Privacy,Bias,Accountability,Transparency,HumanRights |
InstituteofElectricalandElectronics Engineers(IEEE,2019) |
HumanRights,Well-being,DataAgency,Effectiveness,Transparency, Accountability,AwarenessofMisuse,Competence |
ThePublicVoice(2018) | RighttoTransparency;RighttoHumanDetermination;Identification Obligation;FairnessObligation;AssessmentandAccountabilityObligation; Accuracy,Reliability,andValidityobligation;DataQualityObligation;Public SafetyObligation;CybersecurityObligation;ProhibitiononSecretProfiling; ProhibitiononUnitaryScoring;TerminationObligation. |
EuropeanCommission’sHigh-Level ExpertGrouponAI(European Commission,2019) |
HumanAgencyandOversight,TechnicalRobustnessandSafety,Privacyand DataGovernance,Transparency,Diversity,SocietalandEnvironmentalWell being,Accountability |
AI4People(Floridietal.,2018) | Beneficence:promotingwell-being,preservingdignity,sustainingtheplanet; Non-maleficence:privacy,security,monitoringAIadvancement/capability; Autonomy:thepowertodecide;Justice:promotingprosperity,preserving solidarity;Explicability:enablingtheotherprinciplesthroughintelligibility andaccountability |
UnitedNationsEducational, Scientific,andCulturalOrganization (UNESCO,2017) |
HumanDignity,ValueofAutonomy,ValueofPrivacy,“Donoharm” Principle,PrincipleofResponsibility,ValueofBeneficence,ValueofJustice |
Australia’sEthicsFramework (Dawsonetal.,2019) |
GeneratesNet-benefits,RegulatoryandLegalCompliance,Fairness, Contestability,DoNoHarm,PrivacyProtection,Transparencyand Explainability,Accountability |
Journal of Database Management
Volume 31 • Issue 2 • April-June 2020
80
Further,becauseoftheblackboxthathumansarenotabletointerpret,AImayevolvewithout
humanmonitoringandguidance.Forexample,in2017,FacebookshutdownanAIenginebecause
theyfoundthattheAIhadcreateditsownuniquelanguageandhumanscouldnotunderstandthe
language(Bradley2017).WhetherhumanscancontrolAIagentsisabigconcern.Humansprefer
AIagentstoalwaysdoexactlywhatwewantthemtodo.Forinstance,ifaguestasksaself-driving
taxitodrivetotheairportasfastaspossible,thetaximaynotfollowthetrafficrules,butreachthe
airportatthefastestspeed.Thisisnotwhatthecustomerwantsbutwhatthecustomeraskedfor
literally.However,consideringthisproblemfromanotherperspective,ifwetreatAIagentsethically,
isitethicalthatwecontrolwhatactionstheytakeandhowtheymakedecisions?
3.1.2. Data Security and Privacy
ThedevelopmentofAIagentsreliesheavilyonthehugeamountofdata,includingpersonaldataand
privatedata.Almostalloftheapplicationdomainsinwhichdeeplearningissuccessful,suchasApple
SiriandGoogleHome,haveaccesstomountainsofdata.Withmoredatageneratedinsocietiesand
businesses,thereisahigherchancetomisusethesedata.Forinstance,ahealthrecordalwayscontains
sensitiveinformation,whichifnotadequatelyprotected,arogueinstitutioncouldgainaccesstothat
informationandharmthepatientspersonallyandfinancially.Thus,datamustbemanagedproperly
topreventmisuseandmalicioususe(Timmermansetal.,2010).Tokeepdatasafe,eachactionto
thedatashouldbedetailedandrecorded.Boththedataperseandthetransactionrecordmaycause
privacy-relatedrisks.Itis,therefore,importanttoconsiderwhatshouldberecordedandwhoshould
takechargeoftherecordingaction,andwhocanhaveaccesstothedataandrecords.
Table 5. Summary of factors of ethical frameworks
FactorsInstitutions | FLI | IAPP | IEEE | TPV | EUCE | AI4P | UNESCO | AEF | Total |
Responsibility/Accountability | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8 |
Privacy | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7 | |
Transparency | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 | ||
HumanValues/DoNoHarm | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 | ||
HumanWell-Being/Beneficence | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | ||||
Safety | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | |||||
Liberty/Autonomy | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | |||||
HumanControl | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | |||||
Bias/Fairness | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | |||||
SharedBenefit | 1 | 1 | 2 | ||||||
AIArmsRace | 1 | 1 | 2 | ||||||
Justice | 1 | 1 | 2 | ||||||
Prosperity | 1 | 1 | |||||||
Effectiveness | 1 | 1 | |||||||
Accuracy | 1 | 1 | |||||||
Reliability | 1 | 1 | |||||||
Diversity | 1 | 1 | |||||||
HumanDignity | 1 | 1 | |||||||
RegulatoryAndLegalCompliance | 1 | 1 |
Journal of Database Management
Volume 31 • Issue 2 • April-June 2020
81
3.1.3. Autonomy, Intentionality, and Responsibility
Whethertherobotsareregardedasmoralagentsaffecttheinteractions(Sullins,2011).Tobeseen
asrealmoralagents,robotshavetomeetthreecriteria:autonomy,intentionality,andresponsibility
(Sullins,2011).Autonomymeansthatthemachinesarenotunderthedirectcontrolofanyother
agents.Intentionalitymeansthatmachines“actinawaythatismorallyharmfulorbeneficialand
theactionsareseeminglydeliberateandcalculated.”Responsibilitymeansthemachinesfulfillsome
socialrolethatcarrieswithitsomeassumedresponsibilities.Intheveryclassictrolleycase,theone
whocontrolsthetrolleyistheethicalproducer(Allenetal.,2006).Tocontinuetorunonthecurrent
trackandkillfiveworkersortoturntoanothertrackandkillaloneworkerisahard-ethicalchoice
forhumans.WhatchoiceshouldorwouldAImake?WhoshouldberesponsiblefortheAI’schoice?
Themilitaryrobotsthattakechargeofbombdisposalareethicalrecipients.Isitethicalthathumans
decidethedestinyoftheserobots?Humanethicsandmoralitytodaymaynotbeseenasperfectby
futurecivilizations(BostromandYudkowsky,2014).Onereasonisthathumanscannotsolveallthe
recognizedethicalproblems.Theotherreasonisthathumanscannotrecognizealltheethicalproblems.
3.2. Human Factors Give Rise to Ethical Issues
HumanBias,suchasgenderbias(Larson,2017)andracebias(KoolenandCranenburgh,2017),may
beinheritedbyAI.AIagentsareonlyasgoodasthedatahumanputintothem.
AIagentsarebeingtrainedbyhumansandusingdatasetsmadebyhumans,existingbiasesmaybe
learnedbyAIagentsandexhibitedinrealapplications.OncebiaseddataareusedbytheAIagent,the
biaswillbecomeanongoingproblem.Forinstance,softwareusedtopredictfuturecriminalsshowed
biasagainstacertainrace(Bossmann,2016).Thebiascomesfromthetrainingdatathatcontains
humanbiases.Thus,figuringouthowtoprogramandtrainAIagentswithouthumanbiasesiscritical.
3.2.1. Accountability
WhenanAIagentfailsatacertainassignedtask,whoshouldberesponsible.Thismayleadtowhat
isreferredtoas“theproblemofmanyhands”(Timmermansetal.,2010).WhenusinganAIagent,
anundesirableconsequencemaybecausedbytheprogrammingcodes,entereddata,improper
operation,orotherfactors.Whoshouldbetheresponsibleentityfortheundesirableconsequence
–theprogrammer,thedataowner,ortheend-users?
3.2.2. Ethical Standards
“Theultimategoalofmachineethicsistocreateamachinethatitselffollowsanidealethicalprinciple
orsetofprinciples”(AndersonandAnderson,2007p.15).Itistheoreticallyeasybutpracticallyhard
toformulateethicalprinciplesforAIagents.Withoutcomprehensiveandunbiasedethicalstandards,
howcanhumanstrainamachinetobeethical?Further,howcanwemakecertainthatintelligent
machinesunderstandethicalstandardsinthesamewaythatwedo?(WangandSiau,2019a).For
instance,ifweprogramrobotstoalwaysperformnoharm,weshouldfirstmakesurethattherobots
understandwhatharmis.Thisresultsinanotherproblem–whatshouldbetheethicalstandardsfor
harm?Aglobaloruniversallevelofethicsisneeded.Toputsuchethicsintomachines,itisnecessary
toreducetheinformationasymmetriesbetweenAIprogrammersandcreatorsofethicalstandards.
WhileattemptingtoformulateethicalstandardsforAIandintelligentmachines,researchersand
practitionersshouldtrytobetterunderstandexistingethicalprinciplessothattheywillbeableto
applytheethicalprinciplestoresearchactivitiesandhelptraindeveloperstobuildethicalAIs(Wang
andSiau,2018).
3.2.3. Human Rights Laws
Withouttraininginhumanrightslaws,softwareengineersmaywritecodesthatviolateandbreach
keyhumanrightswithoutevenknowingit.Itiscrucialtoteachhumanrightslawstosoftware
Journal of Database Management
Volume 31 • Issue 2 • April-June 2020
82
engineers.Ensuringprivacy-by-designisimportantandmorecost-efficientthanthealternatives.
AbetterknowledgeofhumanrightslawscanhelpAIdesignersandengineerseliminateoratleast
alleviatethediscriminationandinvasionofprivacyissuesinAI.
3.3. Social Impact of Ethical Issues
3.3.1. Automation and Job Replacement
ThedebateonwhetherAIageandIndustry4.0(Siau,Xi,andZou,2019;WangandSiau,2019b)
willcreatemorejobsoreliminatesomejobsisstillheated.Storiesoffactoryworkersbeing
replacedbyautomatedsystemsandrobotsabound.SomearguethatAIwillalsocreatemillions
ofnewjobswithmanyofthesejobsthatarenon-existencetoday.Nevertheless,theconcern
isstillthereaboutthefutureworkforcedisruptionsintheageofAI,suchasthecooperation
betweenhumansandAIagents.ThelabormarketwillbedisruptedandtransformedwithAI.
Whatisnotentirelyclearisthespeedandscopeofthechange.Theterm“uselessclass”hasbeen
suggestedbyHarari(2016).UniversalBasicIncome(UBI)hasbeenpilotedinsomecountries
andFreedomDividend,whichisauniversalbasicincomeforallAmericanadultswithnostrings
attached,isthecampaignplatformfora2020U.S.PresidentialcandidateAndrewYang.The
originalintentionoftechnologydevelopmentistoassisthumansandimprovehumanlives.If
automationandAIcausehugejobreplacementandunemployment,shouldwekeeptherapid
paceoftechnologydevelopment?Also,howcanweprotecthumanrightsandhumanwell-being
whilekeepingupwiththerapidevolutionsandrevolutionsoftechnology?
3.3.2. Accessibility
Accessibility,asanethicalprinciple,referstowhethersystems,products,andservicesareavailable,
accessible, and suitable for all people, including the elderly, the handicapped, and the disabled.
Considering the complexity of new technology and high-tech products, as well as the aging
populationsinsomecountries,theaccessibilityofnewtechnologywilldirectlyaffecthumanwellbeing.Technologydevelopmentshouldbenefithumans.Butifonlyaportionofpeoplebenefit,isit
ethicalandfair?Considerationmustbegiventodevelopingsystems,products,andservicesthatare
accessibletoall,andthebenefitsofadvancedtechnologyshouldbefairlydistributedtoall(Wang
andSiau,2019b).
3.3.3. Democracy and Civil Rights
UnethicalAIresultsinthefragmentationoftruthandeventuallossoftrust,andlossofsocietal
supportforAItechnology.Thelossofinformedandtrustingcommunitiesdentsthestrengthsof
democracies.Asdemocraciessufferandstructuralbiasesamplified,thefreeexerciseofcivilrights
nolongerremainsuniformlyavailabletoall.AIethicsneedstotakeintoconsiderationdemocracy
andcivilrights.
Figure2summarizestheaboveethicalissuesinAI.Solvingtheseissuesproperlywillhelpto
establishaframeworkforbuildingethicalAI.
4. DISCUSSIoNS
4.1. From Framework to Practice
Figure2establishestheframeworkforAIethicslistingthefactorsthatneedtobeconsideredindefining
theethicsofAIinordertobuildethicalAI.EventhoughdefiningtheethicsofAIismultifaceted
andconvoluted,puttingtheethicsofAIintopracticetobuildethicalAIisnoeasyfeattoo.What
shouldethicalAIlooklike?Inthesimplestform,wemaydefinethatethicalAIshoulddonoharm
tohumans.But,whatisharm?Whatconstituteshumanrights?Manyquestionsneedtobeanswered
beforewecandesignandbuildethicalAI.ethicalsensitivitytrainingisrequiredtomakegoodethical
Journal of Database Management
Volume 31 • Issue 2 • April-June 2020
83
decisions.Intheory,AIshouldbeabletorecognizeethicalissues.IfAIiscapableofmakingdecisions,
howcanwedesignanddevelopanAIthatissensitivetoethicalissues?Unfortunately,itisnoteasy
toimplementinpracticeandtorealize.Long-termandsustainedeffortsareneeded.Nonetheless,
understandingandrealizingtheimportanceofdevelopingethicalAIandstartingtoworkonitstep
bysteparepositivestepsforward.
Manyinstitutions,suchasGoogle,IBM,Accenture,Microsoft,andAtomium-EISMD,have
startedworkingonbuildingethicalprinciplestoguidethedevelopmentofAI.InNovember2018,
theMonetaryAuthorityofSingapore(MAS),togetherwithMicrosoftandAmazonWebServices,
launchedtheFEATprinciples(i.e.,fairness,ethics,accountability,andtransparency)fortheuseof
AI.Academics,practitioners,andpolicymakersshouldworktogethertowidentheengagementto
establishethicalprinciplesforAIdesign,development,anduse.
Withtheframeworksandprinciples,protectiveguardrailstoensureethicalbehaviorsareneeded.
Goodgovernanceisnecessarytoenforcetheimplementationandadherencetothoseethicalprinciples,
andalegalvoidiswaitingtobefilledbyregulatoryauthorities(Hanna,2019).Eitherbasedoncase
laworaccomplishedvialegislativeandregulatoryobligations,theselegalandregulatoryinstruments
willbecriticaltothegoodgovernanceofAI,whichhelpstoimplementandenforceethicsofAIto
enablethedevelopmentofethicalAI.
Toprotectthepublic,theU.S.haslongenactedregulatoryinstruments,suchasrulesagainst
discrimination, equal employment opportunity, HIPAA Title II, Commercial Facial Recognition
PrivacyAct,andAlgorithmicAccountabilityAct.Alltheseinstrumentswouldbeusefulinguiding
thedevelopmentoflegalandregulatorypoliciesandframeworksforAIethics.
Inadditiontothelegalandgovernmentrules,self-regulationplaysanimportantroleaswell.
Communicationandinformationdisclosurecanhelpsocietyasawholetoensurethedevelopment
anddeploymentofethicalAI.Fosteringdiscussionforumsandpublishingethicalguidelinesby
companies,industries,andpolicymakerscanhelptoeducateandtrainthepublicinunderstandingthe
benefitsofAIanddispellingmythsandmisconceptionsaboutAI.Besides,havingabetterknowledge
oflegalframeworksonhumanrights,strengtheningthesenseofsecurity,andunderstandingthe
ethicalissuesrelatedtoAI,canfostertrustinAIandenablethedevelopmentofethicalAImore
efficientlyandeffectively.
4.2. ways to Educate AI to Be Ethical
Moor(2006)indicatesthreepotentialwaystotransferAItoethicalagents:totrainAIinto“implicit
ethical agents”, “explicit ethical agents”, and “full ethical agents”. Implicit ethical agents mean
Figure 2. AI Ethics: Framework of building ethical AI
Journal of Database Management
Volume 31 • Issue 2 • April-June 2020
84
constrainingthemachine’sactionstoavoidunethicaloutcomes.Explicitethicalagentsmeanstating
explicitlywhatactionisallowedandwhatisforbidden.Fullethicalagentsmeanmachines,ashumans,
haveconsciousness,intentionality,andfreewill.Animplicitethicalagentcanrestrictthedevelopment
ofAI.Anexplicitethicalagentiscurrentlygettingthemostattentionandisconsideredtobemore
practical(AndersonandAnderson,2007).AfullethicalagentisstillanR&Dinitiativeandoneis
notsurewhenafullethicalagentwillbeareality.
Whenafullethicalagentisrealized,howtotreatanAIagentthathasconsciousness,moral
sense,emotion,andfeelingswillbeanothercriticalconsideration.Forinstance,isitethicalto“kill”
(shutdown)anAIagentifitreplaceshumanjobsorevenendangershumanlives?Isitethicalto
deployrobotsintoadangerousenvironment?Thesequestionsareintertwinedwithhumanethics
andmoralvalues.
4.3. Tradeoff Between AI Ethics and AI Advancement
President-electoftheEuropeanCommissionmadeclearinherrecentlyunveiledpolicyagendathat
thecornerstoneoftheEuropeanAIplanwillbetoensurethat“AImadeinEurope”ismoreethical
thanAImadeanywhereelseintheworld.TheEuropeanCommissionisnottheonlyonethatis
concernedaboutAIethics.ManycountriesarealsoworkingonAIethics.U.S.agenciessuchas
theDepartmentofDefenseandtheDepartmentofTransportationhavelaunchedtheirinitiatives
toensuretheethicaluseofAIwithintheirrespectivedomains.InChina,thegovernment-backed
BeijingAcademyofArtificialIntelligencehasdevelopedtheBeijingAIPrinciplesthatrivalthose
ofothercountries,andtheChineseAssociationforArtificialIntelligencehasalsodevelopeditsown
ethicsguidelines.Manynon-Europeancountries,includingtheUnitedStates,havesignedontothe
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development’s (OECD) AI Principles focusing on
“responsiblestewardshipoftrustworthyAI.”
However,themakersandresearchersofAIatthistimearelikelytopaymoreattentiontohard
performancemetrics,suchassafetyandreliability,orsofterperformancemetrics,suchasusability
andcustomersatisfaction.Morenebulousconceptslikeethicsarenotyetthemosturgentconsideration
–especiallywiththeintensecompetitionbetweencompaniesandbetweennations.
Further,whilesomeconsumersmaypaylipservicetoethicaldesign,theirwordsdonotmatch
theiractions.Forexample,amongconsumerswhosaidtheydistrusttheInternet,only12%reportusing
technologicaltools,suchasvirtualprivatenetwork,toprotecttheirdata,accordingtoaworldwideIpsos
survey(CIGI-Ipsos,2019).Instead,themostimportantfactorsinfluencingconsumers’purchasing
decisionsarestillthepriceandquality.Rightnow,consumerscaremoreaboutwhatAIcandorather
thanwhetherallAI’sactionsareethical.
ThissituationmayputcompaniesandinstitutionswhicharedevelopingAIinatradeoffsituation
–whethertofocusonAIadvancementtorealizeprofitmaximization,ortofocusonAIethicsto
ensuresocietalbenefitsfromAIinnovations.
5. CoNCLUSIoN
UnderstandingandaddressingethicalandmoralissuesrelatedtoAIisstillintheinfancystage.AI
ethicsisnotsimplyabout“rightorwrong”,“goodorbad”,and“virtueandvice”.Itisnotevena
problemthatcanbesolvedbyasmallgroupofpeople.However,ethicalandmoralissuesrelatedto
AIarecriticalandneedtobediscussednow.Thisresearchaimstocallattentiontotheurgentneed
forvariousstakeholderstopayattentiontotheethicsandmoralityofAIagents.Whileattemptingto
formulatetheethicsofAItoenablethedevelopmentofethicalAI,wewillalsounderstandhuman
ethicsbetter,improvetheexistingethicalprinciples,andenhanceourinteractionswithAIagentsinthis
AIage.AIethicsshouldbethecentralconsiderationindevelopingAIagentsandnotanafterthought.
ThefutureofhumanitymaydependonthecorrectdevelopmentofAIethics!
Journal of Database Management
Volume 31 • Issue 2 • April-June 2020
85
REFERENCES
Allen,C.,Wallach,W.,&Smit,I.(2006).Whymachineethics?IEEE Intelligent Systems,21(4),12–17.
doi:10.1109/MIS.2006.83
Anderson,M.,&Anderson,S.L.(2007).Machineethics:Creatinganethicalintelligentagent.AI Magazine,
28(4),15–26.
Anderson, M., & Anderson, S. L. (2011). Machine ethics. Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/
CBO9780511978036
Asimov,I.(1950).Runaround.InI,Robot(TheIsaacAsimovCollectionEd.).NewYorkCity:Doubleday.
Blanchard,K.,&Peale,N.V.(2011).The power of ethical management.Randomhouse.
Bossmann,J.(2016).Top9ethicalissuesinartificialintelligence.WorldEconomicForum.Retrievedfrom
https://www.weforum.org/ethical-issues-in-AI
Bostrom,N.,&Yudkowsky,E.(2014).Theethicsofartificialintelligence.InTheCambridgehandbookof
artificialintelligence(pp.316-334).CambridgePress.doi:10.1017/CBO9781139046855.020
Bradley,T.(2017).FacebookAICreatesItsOwnLanguageInCreepyPreviewofOurPotentialFuture.Forbes.
Retrievedfromhttps://www.forbes.com/sites/tonybradley/2017/07/31/facebook-ai-creates-its-own-languagein-creepy-preview-of-our-potential-future/#45c65554292c
Churchill,L.R.(1999).AreWeProfessionals?ACriticalLookattheSocialRoleofBioethicists.Daedalus,
253–274.PMID:11645877
CIGI-Ipsos.(2019).2019CIGI-IpsosGlobalSurveyonInternetSecurityandTrust.Retrievedfromhttp://www.
cigionline.org/internet-survey-2019
Dawson,D.,Schleiger,E.,Horton,J.,McLaughlin,J.,Robinson,C.,Quezada,G.,…Hajkowicz,S.(2019).
ArtificialIntelligence:Australia’sEthicsFramework.Data61CSIRO,Australia.
EuropeanCommission.(2019).EthicsguidelinesfortrustworthyAI.Retrievedfromhttps://ec.europa.eu/digitalsingle-market/en/news/ethics-guidelines-trustworthy-ai
Floridi,L.,Cowls,J.,Beltrametti,M.,Chatila,R.,Chazerand,P.,Dignum,V.,&Vayena,E.et al.(2018).
AI4People—anethicalframeworkforagoodAIsociety:Opportunities,risks,principles,andrecommendations.
Minds and Machines,28(4),689–707.doi:10.1007/s11023-018-9482-5PMID:30930541
FutureofLifeInstitute.(2017).AsilomarAIPrinciples.Retrievedfromhttps://futureoflife.org/ai-principles/?cnreloaded=1
Hanna,M.(2019).Wedon’tneedmoreguidelinesorframeworksonethicalAIuse.It’stimeforregulatory
action.BrinktheEdgeofRisk.Retrievedfromhttps://www.brinknews.com/we-dont-need-more-guidelines-orframeworks-on-ethical-ai-use-its-time-for-regulatory-action/
Harari,Y.N.(2016).Homo Deus: a brief history of tomorrow.RandomHouse.
IAPP.(2018).WhitePaper–BuildingEthicsintoPrivacyFrameworksforBigDataandAI.Retrievedfrom
https://iapp.org/resources/article/building-ethics-into-privacy-frameworks-for-big-data-and-ai/
IEEE.(2019).EthicallyalignedDesign.Retrievedfromhttps://ethicsinaction.ieee.org/
Koolen,C.,&vanCranenburgh,A.(2017).ThesearenottheStereotypesyouarelookingFor:BiasandFairnessin
AuthorialGenderAttribution.ProceedingsoftheFirstACLWorkshoponEthicsinNaturalLanguageProcessing
(pp.12-22).AcademicPress.doi:10.18653/v1/W17-1602
Larson,B.N.(2017).Genderasavariableinnatural-languageprocessing:Ethicalconsiderations.
Libby,K.(2019).ThisBillHaderDeepfakevideoisAmazing.It’salsoTerrifyingforourFuture.Popular
Mechanics.Retrievedfromhttps://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/security/a28691128/deepfaketechnology/
Journal of Database Management
Volume 31 • Issue 2 • April-June 2020
86
Livni,E.(2019).AnewkindofcybercrimeusesAIandyourvoiceagainstyou.Quartz.Retrievedfromhttps://
qz.com/1699819/a-new-kind-of-cybercrime-uses-ai-and-your-voice-against-you/
MarkkulaCenterforAppliedEthics.(2015).Aframeworkforethicaldecisionmaking.SantaClaraUniversity.
Retrievedfromhttps://www.scu.edu/ethics/ethics-resources/ethical-decision-making/a-framework-for-ethicaldecision-making/
Moor,J.H.(1985).Whatiscomputerethics?Metaphilosophy,16(4),266–275.doi:10.1111/j.1467-9973.1985.
tb00173.x
Moor,J.H.(2006).Thenature,importance,anddifficultyofmachineethics.IEEE Intelligent Systems,21(4),
18–21.doi:10.1109/MIS.2006.80
Nalini,B.(2019).TheHitchhiker’sGuidetoAIEthics.Medium.Retrievedfromhttps://towardsdatascience.
com/ethics-of-ai-a-comprehensive-primer-1bfd039124b0
BBCNews.(2017).FakeObamacreatedusingAIvideotool[YouTubevideo].BBCNews.Retrievedfrom
Now,A.(2018).Humanrightsintheageofartificialintelligence.Accessnow.org.Retrievedfromhttps://www.
accessnow.org/cms/assets/uploads/2018/11/AI-and-Human-Rights.pdf
Paul,R.,&Elder,L.(2006).The Miniature Guide to Understanding the Foundations of Ethical Reasoning.
UnitedStates:FoundationforCriticalThinkingFreePress.P.NP.
Resnik,D.B.(2011).Whatisethicsinresearchandwhyisitimportant.National Institute of Environmental
Health Sciences,1(10),49–70.
Siau,K.,&Wang,W.(2018).BuildingTrustinArtificialIntelligence,MachineLearning,andRobotics.Cutter
Business Technology Journal.,31(2),47–53.
Siau,K.,Xi,Y.,&Zou,C.(2019).Industry4.0:ChallengesandOpportunitiesinDifferentCountries.Cutter
Business Technology Journal.,32(6),6–14.
Stupp,C.(2019).FraudstersUsedAItoMimicCEO’sVoiceinUnusualCybercrimeCase.TheWallStreet
Journal. Retrieved from https://www.wsj.com/articles/fraudsters-use-ai-to-mimic-ceos-voice-in-unusualcybercrime-case-11567157402
Sullins,J.P.(2011).Whenisarobotamoralagent.Machine ethics,151-160.
Telcher,J.G.(2018).Whatdofacialrecognitiontechnologiesmeanforourprivacy?The New York Times.
Retrievedfromhttps://www.nytimes.com/2018/07/18/lens/what-do-facial-recognition-technologies-mean-forour-privacy.html?nytapp=true&smid=nytcore-ios-share
ThePublicVoice.(2018).UniversalGuidelinesforArtificialIntelligence.Retrievedfromhttps://thepublicvoice.
org/ai-universal-guidelines/
Timmermans,J.,Stahl,B.C.,Ikonen,V.,&Bozdag,E.(2010).Theethicsofcloudcomputing:Aconceptual
review.Proceedings of theIEEE Second International Conference Cloud Computing Technology and Science
(pp.614-620).IEEEPress.doi:10.1109/CloudCom.2010.59
UNESCO.(2017).ReportofWorldCommissionontheEthicsofScientificKnowledgeandTechnologyon
RoboticsEthics.Retrievedfromhttps://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000253952
Wang,W.,&Siau,K.(2018).Ethical and moral issue with AI – a case study on healthcare robots. AMCIS 2019
proceedings.AcademicPress.
Wang,W.,&Siau,K.(2019a).ArtificialIntelligence,MachineLearning,Automation,Robotics,FutureofWork
andFutureofHumanity:AReviewandResearchAgenda.Journal of Database Management,30(1),61–79.
Wang,W.,&Siau,K.(2019b).Industry4.0:EthicalandmoralPredicaments.Cutter Business Technology
Journal.,32(6),36–45.
Yu,J.(1998).Virtue:ConfuciusandAristotle.Philosophy East & West,48(2),323–347.doi:10.2307/1399830
Journal of Database Management
Volume 31 • Issue 2 • April-June 2020
87
Keng Siau is Chair of the Department of Business and Information Technology at the Missouri University of Science
and Technology. Previously, he was the Edwin J. Faulkner Chair Professor and Full Professor of Management at
the University of Nebraska-Lincoln (UNL), where he was Director of the UNL-IBM Global Innovation Hub. Dr. Siau
also served as VP of Education for the Association for Information Systems. He has written more than 300 academic
publications, and is consistently ranked as one of the top information systems researchers in the world based on
the h-index and productivity rate. Dr. Siau’s research has been funded by the U.S. National Science Foundation,
IBM, and other IT organizations. He has received numerous teaching, research, service, and leadership awards,
including from the International Federation for Information Processing Outstanding Service Award, the IBM Faculty
Award, and the IBM Faculty Innovation Award. Dr. Siau received his Ph.D. in Business Administration from the
University of British Columbia. He can be reached at [email protected].
Weiyu Wang holds a Master of Science degree in Information Science and Technology and an MBA from the
Missouri University of Science and Technology. Her research focuses on the impact of artificial intelligence (AI)
on economy, society, and mental well-being. She is also interested in the governance, ethical, and trust issues
related to AI. She can be reached at [email protected].
View publication stats